Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sheehan threatens to sue 'American Mourning' authors
WorldNetDaily ^ | 10/24/2006 | WND Staff

Posted on 10/24/2006 11:18:02 AM PDT by Impeach98

'American Mourning' authors prepare to defend book

Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan issues threat to sue over claims in publication

--------------------------------

Posted: October 24, 2006
1:20 p.m. Eastern

"American Mourning" co-author Melanie Morgan says she is prepared to defend the book against allegations of slander or libel, but she hopes it won't go to that because she wants to spare the family of fallen hero Casey Sheehan any further pain.

It was his mother, anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan, who told a nationally syndicated radio show by Stephanie Miller that she was preparing for possible litigation over allegations in the book that she became addicted to "online chat rooms of a pornographic nature" after her son died in Iraq.

"I am totally confident in my level of documentation," Morgan told WND today. "It's locked in a bank vault, and we are prepared to use it should Ms. Sheehan proceed to litigation.

"We hope that doesn't happen for the sake of her family, the Sheehan family," she said, because the documentation is "very graphic in nature.

"We had hoped to spare the family any further uncomfortableness and embarrassment," she said.

The book, published by WND Books and released just a little over a week ago, already is climbing the ranks of Amazon.com and other book lists. It is the story of two families – the Johnsons and Sheehans – that lost sons in the war against terror. Their sons – Casey Sheehan and Justin Johnson – were best friends since they met at Fort Hood in Texas. They went to Iraq and died in the same area just six days apart.

But the book explains how little else the families have in common: with the Johnson family bonding closer than ever and Justin's father, in fact, volunteering to replace his son in the war on terror and going to fight in Iraq.

The book explains how the Sheehan family, however, experienced difficulties and disintegration as Cindy Sheehan chose to turn her anger over the loss of her son against her own country and president.

Morgan told WND that she and co-author Catherine Moy both have been in contact with "a very high-powered attorney in L.A. who is an expert on slander and libel law."

"We are prepared to hire him immediately should the need become apparent. That will depend on what Ms. Sheehan decides to do."

She said she found out about the threat when CNN censored an interview with her about the book. A call placed by WND to CNN to comment on the situation wasn't returned immediately, but the issue arose as Morgan was preparing for an interview on "American Mourning."

Morgan said she was en route to CNN headquarters in New York when she got a call from the producer of the "Glenn Beck" show, outlining what the short interview was scheduled to cover.

The producer specifically mentioned the online chat room issue, Morgan said. But a few minutes later, she got another call from the same producer explaining that the interview would deal with all other aspects of the book, but not that.

Morgan said she asked why, and was told because it "involved legal issues."

"Then we discovered Cindy Sheehan had appeared on the Miller show, saying she was going to sue," Morgan said.

Sheehan had used the radio interview to call the authors "hate-mongers" and accuse them of "using our tragedy for profit."

She dismissed the information in the book as hearsay.

"We wrote the book not to make life uncomfortable for Cindy Sheehan, far from it," Morgan said. "We wrote it as a tribute to her son Casey, an honorable and dutiful soldier, a man who was tremendously inspiring in what he did.

"He volunteered not once but twice, and actually went into Sadr City to rescue fellow soldiers," she said. "He was told he did not have to go. His story is an amazing story, as is Justin Johnson's."

"We felt and do feel we did a good job of trying to show how these men became such heroes to the American public. But we felt that it would be dishonest not to include contextual information about Cindy, her story, what she had been telling in the media, which was inaccurate in many respects," Morgan told WND.

The book, according to Ann Coulter, is "a beautiful, raw war story that breaks the hearts and strengthens the resolve to protect America from her enemies." David Limbaugh calls it "arguably the most poignant portrayal of love, loss, and grief that polarizes our nation today," adding, "It moved and astounded me." Sean Hannity says simply, "The truth in this book will set you free."

Moy is an award-winning journalist and columnist for the Vacaville Reporter, Cindy Sheehan's former hometown newspaper. Morgan, a weekly columnist for WND, is a talk radio show host in San Francisco and chairman of Move America Forward.

Kristen Schremp, a publicist for Morgan and Moy, has confirmed there are hundreds of telephone records, e-mails and other documents supporting the statements made in the book.

Fans of Sheehan have been responding to the book with vitriol, calling one of the authors "fat" and a "whore." And those have been the calmer reactions.

The political website Crooks and Liars attacked Morgan as a "a fringe talk-show host" who was leader of "the low-class MAF organization." However, despite the criticism, Morgan's talk-radio show is one of the highest-rated drive time programs in the San Francisco media market – one of the largest markets in the nation.

The attack on Morgan's leadership of the pro-troop organization, Move America Forward, seems designed to diminish her credentials as a prominent supporter of the men and women of the United States military. Move America Forward is the nation's largest grass-roots pro-troop organization and has shipped over 16 tons of coffee, cookies, beef jerky and Gatorade to U.S. Troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The attacks quickly deteriorated into vulgarity and insult-laden jeers.

"Michelle Malkin, Mary Matalin, Melanie Morgan... These right-wing b------s all have the same initials of MM."

"if i call those 2 women whores, then that's MY responsibility."

"Bibi -- but then that would be an insult to whores."

"That one on the left really needs to work on her eating disorder before she starts pointing that sausage finger."

Finally, the comments became so over the top that the website owner intervened and instructed participants to ease up on their attacks. The site owner deleted dozens of the most offensive and vulgar posts, but dozens of new attacks were posted and not removed by the website's administrator:

The anger by the participants seems to have confused them on some of the essential points of their protests. One individual criticized Morgan's employment at a Republican political consulting firm, however Morgan has never worked for any such firm. Another participant identified co-author Moy as being an employee of KSFO radio along with Morgan. However, Moy has never had any connection with the radio station – she works at the Vacaville Reporter.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: americanmourning; cindysheehan; cnn; melaniemorgan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-108 next last
To: river rat

Well now you got a point there, I was trying to give her the benefit of the doubt, why I don't know, can't stand what she is doing to her son's memory, or what she's trying to do to this country...

Semper Fi back (says hubby)


51 posted on 10/24/2006 12:49:18 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 (My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Axhandle
Yeah I just saw this- Sheehan doesn't like the fact that she has become a public figure and that people examine the lives of public figures- If others can't sue people who simply report public information about them, then she won't be able to either unless she gets a liberal judge. Cindy really is a disgrace to America- not because she is a democrat, but because of her blatant exploitation of the death of her son to hurt the administration- She's accusing the women of exploiting her son's death when she has done NOTHING but exploit ihs death for profit! She just doesn't like having people point out the obvious!

Read more at sacredscoop.com ...

52 posted on 10/24/2006 12:51:24 PM PDT by CottShop (http://sacredscoop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Axhandle
Sir- Cindy Sheehan was an activist for money well before her son was killed, and she jump4ed on the money wagon just as soon as her son died to exploit his death. Kerry paid her to bring her message to the masses, she has been offered money for her protests- No sir- She is as guilty as those other scum that use her to proffit as well!

Read more at sacredscoop.com ...

53 posted on 10/24/2006 12:53:55 PM PDT by CottShop (http://sacredscoop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27
Sheehan strikes me as a lady that NEVER received the "attention" she desired -- and would gladly have throw her son under the train to get it.

She's in hog heaven...
Now famous for blaming the President, rather than the Islamonazis for killing her son.

I firmly believe - she would choose her current "celebrity" over having her son back alive..
Now, think about that..

Semper Fi
54 posted on 10/24/2006 1:03:08 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

This is hilarious. It's just like Kerry's shills screaming about the Swiftvets. Hiwever, unlike Traitor I (Kerry), Traitor II (Mother Cindy) is dumb enough to sue for libel and face discovery. BRING IT ON!!


55 posted on 10/24/2006 1:14:07 PM PDT by libstripper (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush

You left out Mary Mapes!


56 posted on 10/24/2006 1:16:21 PM PDT by Right Cal Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia

LOL!!


57 posted on 10/24/2006 1:17:43 PM PDT by fishergirl (Choose your vices carefully, then be loyal to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

At least you're not mentioning the infamous Helen Thomas Sex tapes this time. Thank you for allowing my poor dogs to recover from the terrible trauma they suffered the last time you so cruelly (to my dogs) mentioned the Helen Thoma Sex Tapes.


58 posted on 10/24/2006 1:18:13 PM PDT by libstripper (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

But Cindy, you've made yourself a public figure. Are you prepared to prove malice?


59 posted on 10/24/2006 1:19:17 PM PDT by Petronski (CNN is an insidiously treasonous, enemy propaganda organ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
Sheehan had used the radio interview to call the authors "hate-mongers" and accuse them of "using our tragedy for profit."

Talk about calling the kettle black.

60 posted on 10/24/2006 1:20:09 PM PDT by hoosierboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
Say "I'll have to be deposed, " and "there's a discovery process which will ask me all kinds of uncomfortable questions."

Be intereting to see what a "pool" would do with bets that she would actually pursue a lawsuit. But she could file one and sit on it a long time--that'd still give the writer the right of discovery and deposition.

61 posted on 10/24/2006 1:20:52 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
Morgan told WND that she and co-author Catherine Moy both have been in contact with "a very high-powered attorney in L.A. who is an expert on slander and libel law."

You can be sure Morgan and Moy got good legal advice long before they sent this book to print, just to make sure their documentation was not only incontrovertible but fully admissible in defense against a libel action.

Since the 2004 election, any conservative who thinks a liberal public figure won't threaten to sue for exposing her mis-doings is living in a fantasy world.

62 posted on 10/24/2006 1:27:47 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

Are you pimping your blog or trying to link to something? I clicked your link and saw a blog that has very few hits but many, many ads. I also see that you've been at FR for less than a week. Lots of stuff there but I didn't see anything about Sheehan. And I'm not going to sift through it. Can you quote whatever it is you were referring to?


63 posted on 10/24/2006 1:29:20 PM PDT by Axhandle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
"Are you prepared to prove malice?"

Actually, I don't think it matters even if she could show malice. Truth is an absolute defense against an accusation of libel, so long as the facts exposed were obtained legally.

64 posted on 10/24/2006 1:32:11 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
She is preparing for possible litigation.......

She isn't going to do anything except whine and rant. Bad press is almost as bad as no press to someone like Sheehan.

Her derelict corp of smelly hippy peaceniks well cause all the mayhem they can. As well as destroy and attack those possessing the books and the vendors that sell them. This is what the peace movement and the political left do in this country. They censor, threaten, intimidate and violate all who do not embrace their dogma and fanaticism.

Cindy will huff and puff her usual "outraged" virtue shtick but she won't dare to pursue the authors in court. I would love to see it but I don't think it's going to happen.
65 posted on 10/24/2006 1:34:17 PM PDT by silver charm (Free our Marines......................................NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

I'd love for her to sue, that way, we can see the hot steamy love notes between her and Lew Rockwell...EEEWWWWWW.....


66 posted on 10/24/2006 1:34:36 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte

That's the other side of her two-pronged burden of proof as I understand it: (a) that the claims are false and (b) that the authors acted with malice.

But you're right, if the authors can prove truth, it's over. My point is that the authors can win by knocking down either prong.


I welcome correction to my understanding of this.


67 posted on 10/24/2006 1:35:18 PM PDT by Petronski (CNN is an insidiously treasonous, enemy propaganda organ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

If it's not HER version of the truth, she doesn't want it spoken or written, and certainly not on TV!

Cindy is hoping the courts will help her figure out a way to put toothpaste back in the tube.


68 posted on 10/24/2006 1:35:44 PM PDT by Apple Blossom (...around here, city hall is something of a between meals snack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

As Rush says, the libs are sure fun to watch, when they realize they are truly out of power.


69 posted on 10/24/2006 1:40:42 PM PDT by newcthem (Brought to you by the INFIDEL PARTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cai Della

Cindy is standing in a glass house with a rock in her hand.


70 posted on 10/24/2006 1:43:12 PM PDT by Apple Blossom (...around here, city hall is something of a between meals snack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Hey - I must be a MM, too!!!!!


71 posted on 10/24/2006 1:48:27 PM PDT by MortMan (I was going to be indecisive, but I changed my mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
I do believe that perhaps this part of Cindy's life may be cooling down, since she said in a recent interview that she buried much of her essential equipment in the ground at Crawford, TX. Why didn't someone have her forcibly committed right then and there? The woman has a hysterectomy, and this is her comment? Sheehan is mentally diseased.
72 posted on 10/24/2006 1:49:18 PM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Bogtrotter52

Yeah discovery should be fun....


73 posted on 10/24/2006 2:02:16 PM PDT by Walkingfeather (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

And Michael Moore!

Mother Moonbat and Michael Moore - the next good book title!


74 posted on 10/24/2006 2:04:26 PM PDT by Kitten Festival
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Dah-dah, dah-dah!


75 posted on 10/24/2006 2:08:30 PM PDT by Erasmus (I invited Benoit Mandelbrot to the Shoreline Grill, but he never got there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: threeleftsmakearight
No! we don't need to hear any "porn" involving Mother Sheehan. That's a mental image I can do without.

How about some Cindy soft core? Look at Cindy smile.- Tom


76 posted on 10/24/2006 2:10:56 PM PDT by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
Oh no...you must be part of the Vast MM Conspiracy©, then, too.....:))
77 posted on 10/24/2006 2:11:31 PM PDT by Salamander (And don't forget my Dog; fixed and consequent.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

Let her sue and let her be deposed. :-)


78 posted on 10/24/2006 2:11:41 PM PDT by ShandaLear (Elect Republicans for the Common Good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Tom

What the....??


79 posted on 10/24/2006 2:12:02 PM PDT by Salamander (And don't forget my Dog; fixed and consequent.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

Feh.

I have no MM in my name so I can't play.....:(


80 posted on 10/24/2006 2:13:24 PM PDT by Salamander (And don't forget my Dog; fixed and consequent.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

That picture! My eyes! They burn! AHHHHHHHH!!!!!


81 posted on 10/24/2006 2:15:36 PM PDT by rbosque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

It seems the leftists can't take the truth being told. The Clinton's throw a fit over a TV movie, and this horrid woman (?) wants to sue over a book that just might show the reader who she really is. This is of course, a must read.


82 posted on 10/24/2006 2:18:14 PM PDT by ladyinred (RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShandaLear

I agree with you that she would never allow herself to be deposed on her exploits.

My guess is the PG rated book would turn into an R rated deposition.


83 posted on 10/24/2006 2:26:27 PM PDT by RWGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift

I wonder if Cindy likes girls? yuck!


84 posted on 10/24/2006 2:30:38 PM PDT by tutstar (Baptist ping list-freepmail to get on or off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat

I believe you hit the nail on the head. She's a trademark attn wh*re.


85 posted on 10/24/2006 2:41:43 PM PDT by Paul_N_Lakeside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

Typical left-wing reaction; if it reveals that the left is bad, suppress it.


86 posted on 10/24/2006 3:14:14 PM PDT by RWB Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usflagwaver

the title of her next book should be lets talk dirty by a very ugly old floozie


87 posted on 10/24/2006 4:55:56 PM PDT by mickey blue eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Axhandle
Well gee Mr. "I've been here longer than you so I know more"- I gave my opinion about Cindy- My site was just started awhile ago & yes, I don't get many hits- thank you for reminding me- I had lost track of that fact- Oh & excuse me for running adds trying to suppliment my income- how awful of me- cripes- didn't realize that I needed to have an article about Cindy to respond to a Cindy thread here- I'll check the rule books fo FR once again, but pretty sure it wasn't mentioned there.

Read more at sacredscoop.com ...

Read more at sacredscoop.com ...

88 posted on 10/24/2006 5:25:18 PM PDT by CottShop (http://sacredscoop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

No. I'm not going pore over your sight in order to supplement your income. You assert that there is something there regarding your comments about Sheehan. Please present it. I'm not soliciting the activities of a blog pimp.


89 posted on 10/24/2006 5:39:50 PM PDT by Axhandle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Axhandle
Grow up kid- I never asked you to pour over my site nor did I ask you to support my site- I never said my site had info on Cindy- I simply gave my opinion based on information I've read about Cindy in the news- Since you feel the need to act chiuldish and insult my blog and me- You can look the info up yourself or not- I could care less which you choose- You obviously took offense to my post that was in response to what you said & so you had to reply by attacking me? Great- whatever kid!

Read more at sacredscoop.com ...

90 posted on 10/24/2006 5:48:19 PM PDT by CottShop (http://sacredscoop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

I simply have a CLICKABLE link in posts so that anyone who wishes to check it out doesn't have to copy and paste the address- visit if you like- don't if you don't- again, I could care less- Look fella, I came to this site because it has relevent news that I'm interested in- I don't need your petty little childish insults- As I said, Grow up!


91 posted on 10/24/2006 5:51:34 PM PDT by CottShop (http://sacredscoop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

So what you typed was not part of your comment, more of a tagline put into the body of your comment. Got it.


92 posted on 10/24/2006 5:59:19 PM PDT by Axhandle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; Just A Nobody; jazusamo; RedRover; W04Man

MUST read. Thread is better than the article ; )


93 posted on 10/24/2006 6:57:10 PM PDT by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axhandle

How DARE anyone criticize a family that isn't George Bushs!!!


94 posted on 10/24/2006 6:59:45 PM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

a porn story featuring cindy sheehan would be a good substitute for ipecac to induce vomiting


95 posted on 10/24/2006 7:20:35 PM PDT by steamroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

I think I'll check Amazon for a copy of this book.


96 posted on 10/24/2006 7:26:27 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
That picture makes me think the Death Mom is trying to imitate Carol Burnett in the old 70s "made for TV movie," Friendly Fire.
97 posted on 10/24/2006 7:32:04 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("Today We FREEP! Tomorrow We Vote!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
Dear old misguided nutcase Cindy sure can dish it out but sure cannot look into the mirror and she what she is.

Melanie Morgan is tops along with Lee Rodgers and Officer Vic....KSFO 560 AM Morning Show Rocks.

98 posted on 10/24/2006 8:01:35 PM PDT by harpo11 (Republicans & Conservatives Do Not Be Rope-A-Doped into Cut & Run this Nov. 7 by the old media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Tom

Makes me want to ... vomit


99 posted on 10/24/2006 8:05:17 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (If you dont vote on election day, then who are you electing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: harpo11
If only someone could travel back in time to when Cindy was just an infant and... well you know the rest.

Christian news and commentary at: sacredscoop.com ...

100 posted on 10/24/2006 8:06:29 PM PDT by CottShop (http://sacredscoop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson