Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael J. Fox is a cannibal
http://www.worldnetdaily.com ^ | 10 25 06 | Jill Staneck

Posted on 10/25/2006 10:21:35 AM PDT by freepatriot32

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 next last
To: EagleUSA
The sad thing is, is that the political/celebrity Left doesn't give a damn about Fox's condition per se; it's all about advancing their toxic agenda.

I bet none of the celebrities actually stop by Fox's house and ask him how he's doing, offering him money or assistance. Nope, typical back-stabbing liberal elitists, they use people and spit them back out when they're not accessible anymore. Look at Bill Clinton. How many celebrities actually want to hang out with him anymore now that he's out of power?

141 posted on 10/25/2006 5:20:08 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

The sad thing is, is that the political/celebrity Left doesn't give a damn about Fox's condition per se; it's all about advancing their toxic agenda.
-----
Of course not. The same with Christopher Reeve. He was used as an "emotional promotion piece" and thrown out. Just like Fox. Another sad dupe. But this is how the libs operate. You are only useful until you can no longer generate money or votes. Then you are history. Kinda like the long list of Clinton confidants.


142 posted on 10/25/2006 5:24:42 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Always Independent
Maybe someone will name a new dance after him "SARC

Like Elaine Benes' dance in Seinfeld?

143 posted on 10/25/2006 5:25:59 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Thanks. He should have changed his name to cause me less confusion. Dag nab it.


144 posted on 10/25/2006 5:47:47 PM PDT by BufordP ("Every morning I start my day with juice, toast, and a big bowl of Baby Crunch!" -- Michael J. Fox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; ...
Video: Scrappleface responds to the Michael J. Fox stem-cell ad
Michael J. Fox Records Second Misleading Stem Cell Research Ad (He Supports a pro-cloning Democrat?
The Unconscionable Claims of Michael J. Fox
Stars and Athletes in Missouri Respond to Michael J. Fox Ad
Michael J Fox Addresses Rush Limbaugh's Comments...
the celebrity response to MJF:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nguJQ_dRPXw
 

145 posted on 10/25/2006 7:11:59 PM PDT by Coleus (Woe unto him that call evil good and good evil"-- Isaiah 5:20-21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
I had to laugh tonight.

Alan Colmes asked Michael Reagan an entrapment question, "Do you think your mother Nancy was exploited by the embronic stem cell people?"

Much to Alan's shock (including me and I suppose everyone else), the answer was, "Yes, and so was Christopher Reeve".

Leni

146 posted on 10/25/2006 7:20:58 PM PDT by MinuteGal (Florida Freepers, keep up with FL politics & freeps on our state forum. To access it, freepmail me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atlaw

No, my statement, which I do not find ridiculous at all, is that both the blastocyst stage and four-and-a-half years old are stages of human development. That should be quite clear from a plain reading of the original statement.

Don't you agree that this statement is true?

I do not confer equivalence to a blastocyst and four-and-a-half year old. They are obviously different. Likewise a sigle spermatazoa is different, even from a blastocyst. This should be apparent even to the casual observer.


147 posted on 10/25/2006 7:27:31 PM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: devolve; potlatch; holdonnow; ntnychik; Grampa Dave; Smartass
Let's see. . .Republicans simply don't want Federal taxpayers to fund stem cell research that kills life.

And. . .Democrats want to continue to kill (abort) a million babies a year.

Michael J. Fox goes off his meds to dance his little dance to make us ignore these facts.

Sorry, Mr. Bojangles, your party murders people while ours protects their lives--even yours. . . .

For, it remains for the nonmedical actor Democrat hacktivist Fox et al to demonstrate ANY return on embryonic stem cell research.

Democrats and their death camps in hideous disguise cannot do a thing about the stench.

148 posted on 10/25/2006 9:02:34 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

Good comments Phil, especially since they haven't proved one thing that shows embryonic stem cells to be superior to adult stem cells.


149 posted on 10/25/2006 9:24:12 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Sorry I forgot the song has already been named. The Jerk!


150 posted on 10/25/2006 11:26:10 PM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
For, it remains for the nonmedical actor Democrat hacktivist Fox et al to demonstrate ANY return on embryonic stem cell research.

Does the value of the research matter? By arguing about the value of research, we accept the utilitarian argument that this nascent human life can be destroyed if the value derived from the destruction is high enough.

I reject this argument wholesale. If I cannot determine the value of the human life objectively, how am I to measure it against the value of the research? If the value of the human life of a blastocyst is zero, then it would be fine destroy them for any purpose, and there should be Embryo Milkshakes available down at the Dairy Queen. However, if there is some positive value to be placed on this human life, any argument that weighs that value against anything else must assume that that value can be ascertained.

This is simply beyond our capabilities as human beings. I will not tinker with the machinery of weighing the value of some human life against other things. Down that road lies all the horrors of the 20th Century, and Hundreds of Millions dead.

151 posted on 10/26/2006 3:50:01 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
As Rush so aptly put it, step into the political arena, open yourself up to being challenged. It's just that simple. Liberals just don't get this. Not Fox, not the Dixie Chicks, not Tim Robbins, nor any of the other liberal clowns and FR-bashers.

These people need to GROW UP. We all have compassion for Michael J. Fox. It's a pity what's happened to him. But NOBODY is immune from criticism when they peddle mistruths in the public arena, especially with an election at stake. You can't just lie with impunity, whatever victim status you claim.

152 posted on 10/26/2006 4:27:50 AM PDT by veronica (http://www.freerepublic.com/~starcmc/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CDHart
I think the terms "zygote," "morula," "blastocyst," etc. are perfectly proper in a technical sceintific context, but are sometimes used instead of "human embryo" in general journalism because they sound less human--- "blastocyst" sounds cancerous, as you noticed.

Like "fetal" sounds like a combination of "fecal" and "fatal."

("I didn't kill an unborn baby as long as your index finger, I merely removed 5 cm fetal material...")

See Politics and the English Language by George Orwell.

153 posted on 10/26/2006 6:23:59 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Tellin' it like it spozed to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

I should have made clear that my comment was directed to gridlock. I pinged you only because I was concerned that you had somehow taken at face value gridlock's ridiculous misrepresentation that I somehow favored a viability test based upon the ability to ride a bicycle.


154 posted on 10/26/2006 7:00:39 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: atlaw; LexBaird
Just curious. Are you always this childishly dishonest when you debate? It doesn't do your side of the argument (whatever it is) much good.

Hey, LexBaird! Looks like atlaw has decided to leave with this comment, in spite of multiple attempts to engage his arguments. Ironic, isn't it?

155 posted on 10/26/2006 7:11:05 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
No, my statement, which I do not find ridiculous at all, is that both the blastocyst stage and four-and-a-half years old are stages of human development. That should be quite clear from a plain reading of the original statement.

Don't you agree that this statement is true?

Oh. Ok. So we're back to the unremarkable observation that human reproduction and development involves a lot of "stages." I am, of course, happy to agree with that, but I don't find it any more insightful than an observation that weather involves a lot of "patterns."

156 posted on 10/26/2006 7:11:41 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

Thanks, Palladin. :-)


157 posted on 10/26/2006 7:12:11 AM PDT by syriacus (LORD, bless the good people of Iraq and our troops AND confound those who plot evil against them..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Ooops. You're a post late with your snorting.


158 posted on 10/26/2006 7:13:43 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC
Can't researchers use whatever stem cells they want? I thought it was just the groups dragging on the gov. teet that cannot use embryonic cells.

I think you're right - this is a "drama queen" tactic used by the left and their "half truth" minions in the MSM... Now that the population has realized Republicans aren't starving old people to death, or making them eat dog food - the dems have come up with the new one - we're trying to keep diseases from being cured. If dems politicize medicine, it'll hurt the sick in the long run. In the short run, they'll get a few votes, they must not care about anyone but themselves...

159 posted on 10/26/2006 7:20:20 AM PDT by GOPJ (Movie tickets are donations to the people who undermine us, our families, and our beliefs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
But if he is not talking about embryonic stem cell research, then his statements make no sense at all.

Liberals never let that stop them.

Cordially,

160 posted on 10/26/2006 7:33:48 AM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson