Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Return to Triangulation (libertarion vs social right)
National Review Online ^ | 10/25/06 | David Boaz & David Kirby

Posted on 10/25/2006 11:10:46 AM PDT by Blackirish

As the Republican base fragments and Christian conservatives consider a “fast” from politics, the polling data point to a mid-term Republican thumping. Less than two weeks from now, Republicans will begin their post-mortem soul searching. And as the corpses of their House and Senate majorities grow cold, so should Karl Rove’s 2006 campaign strategy.

(Excerpt) Read more at article.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: besthijack; bestthread; blackirish; braad; creation; darwin; darwincentral; darwinhomebase; doublehijacked; evolution; frhero; frlegend; hero; hijack; hijacked; hijackedthread; legend; libertian; minifreepathon; monthlydonorthon; rehijacked; religion; science; socialright; threadjacked; threadjacking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,661-1,665 next last
To: nopardons

Your welcome. I felt your frustration from afar. This author has been reading his own press clippings way too much.


481 posted on 10/25/2006 10:59:49 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier fighting in Mahmudiyah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

There is plenty of challenge in Academia for the Theory of Evolution, not the basic theory itself, because it has been pretty well as proven as it can be, it happened.

The specifics are what are being debated now, and they are debated very thoroughly and in some cases very hotly.

The DNA evidence has become overwhelming, but there are a few mysteries still to be solved, there are more and older fossils coming in, and where they fit is also hotly debated.

The Theory of Evolution itself is beyond debate, the specifics are what are being questioned, and will be for some time, as new evidence comes to light.


482 posted on 10/25/2006 11:00:00 PM PDT by Jaguarbhzrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Thank you! Maybe you and I and a few others could try again, to get it all back on track and if THAT fails, have our own internal chat about nothing. LOL


483 posted on 10/25/2006 11:00:04 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic

"Are confessions made under duress valid? ;)"

Valid or not, it still gets you 3-5 at Gitmo.



484 posted on 10/25/2006 11:01:32 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Demonrats want the Gays out of Congress.....stand back and let them purge their base.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Do you have the level of education that she does?

I can't speak for Dimensio, or Mom MD for that matter, but I do know that Mom MD just applied the 2nd law of thermodynamics to an open system to support her argument, and that is just plain wrong. It is freshman physics for crying out loud!

485 posted on 10/25/2006 11:02:11 PM PDT by wyattearp (Study! Study! Study! Or BONK, BONK, on the head!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic
Are you in a state of "duress"? Have I water boarded you, or tortured you in any way?

I take it that you ARE a retread, then; a cowardly one, who was banned for good reason, but crept back under a new nic. Okay, so now that we have THAT all settled, what was your nic here, before you were banned?

486 posted on 10/25/2006 11:03:12 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

"What has been hijacked is this thread! Instead of it being about the article posted at the head of this thread, it is FR's Darwinists V. Creationists."

I agree.


487 posted on 10/25/2006 11:03:41 PM PDT by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

You are not only a true empath, but intelligent! :-)


488 posted on 10/25/2006 11:04:28 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

Wow, look at that, we agree.

The authors of this article, suffer from what is called delusional wishful thinking, and must have been smoking vast quantities of illegal substances to actually write it up as if it were true.

As President Bush said, they are already measuring for curtains, and they haven't even had the loan approved.

They are jumping the gun, and the more snide and confident they get, the more the American electorate is going to turn on them.

Just thinking about a house leader Pelosi gives me the creeps, and her spouting off the first 100 hours in power had to be one of the most idiotic things she has ever done.

Then again, the Dims have never been very intelligent, they lie to get into power, but she spouted the truth, whoops.


489 posted on 10/25/2006 11:04:54 PM PDT by Jaguarbhzrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

Will you help bring the thread back into the fold, so to speak, with me, now?


490 posted on 10/25/2006 11:05:58 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

We'll, at least not a complete moron (like the idiot in this article). Two more weeks and we'll know how it all shakes out.


491 posted on 10/25/2006 11:06:15 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier fighting in Mahmudiyah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: Jaguarbhzrd
The Theory of Evolution itself is beyond debate, the specifics are what are being questioned, and will be for some time, as new evidence comes to light.

That's funny since I see a LOT of debate within the great unwashed. Ya'll may be leading but who is following? If evolutionists are limiting their science to the process between "creation" and death then there is a gaping hole in potential knowledge. Today's evolutionists are using brute force through the courts and schools to validate their view of this issue. That is a sure sign of insecurity in their own ability to educate those that come to their classes with strongly held beliefs.

492 posted on 10/25/2006 11:08:59 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
However it shakes out it 2 weeks, you can be sure that Libertarians weren't much of a factor in determining it.
493 posted on 10/25/2006 11:09:23 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Demonrats want the Gays out of Congress.....stand back and let them purge their base.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: Jaguarbhzrd
Yep, that "first 100 hours" garbage, said by Pelosi, was enough to turn everyone's stomach for a week.

Methinks that the Dems have not only much over played their hand, but have made so many gaffs, that even Mr. and Mrs. I DON'T PAY ANY ATTENTION TO POLITICS UNTIL A COUPLE OF WEEKS BEFORE ANY ELECTION, have been really turned off.

494 posted on 10/25/2006 11:09:30 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
I agree that evolution does not address anything other than what happens during the animation cycle of an organism. It does not address how that organism came to be animated. If Evolution is that limited then science is left with a gaping hole and maybe it should be addressed.

Evolution can only address what it was meant to address. Specifically, it is imperfect replication and a change in alleles in a population over time. It only deals with living organisms. It cannot, and does not, deal with non-life. I agree that I would like a theory that would explain that, but that would be another theory entirely. Right now there is not enough evidence to go beyond the hypothesis stage.

If science can reproduce "creation" in the lab then ID or Creationism is forever discredited.

Actually, I've had that discussion with others. Creationists will not consider ID or creationism discredited in those circumstances. I believe that the exact response was "get your own dirt". Meaning, do it without any atoms to work with. It never ends.

495 posted on 10/25/2006 11:09:33 PM PDT by wyattearp (Study! Study! Study! Or BONK, BONK, on the head!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: Jaguarbhzrd

So, there is hope after all. Common ground. I have nightmares about Pelosi being Speaker. I also fear that the dims will leave our troops out to dry if they get into power (as they work extremely hard to pursue their impeachment agenda against Pres. Bush). The people of this country had better be awake on election day, or we are all in deep trouble.


496 posted on 10/25/2006 11:09:54 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier fighting in Mahmudiyah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Never have, never will.


497 posted on 10/25/2006 11:11:01 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier fighting in Mahmudiyah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Are you in a state of "duress"? Have I water boarded you, or tortured you in any way?

This whole thread is pretty tortuous.

I take it that you ARE a retread, then; a cowardly one, who was banned for good reason, but crept back under a new nic. Okay, so now that we have THAT all settled, what was your nic here, before you were banned?

No, actually, this is my one and only account. I signed up in early '01, six months before 911. Does this change your perception of me at all? I've been on several freeps, including a solo freep of Castro-loyal Cubans at a socialist gathering, and one where two handfulls of us freeped an anti-war crowd of 3,000. Here are some pictures. I'd like to think I'm among friends.

Sorry, I was just trying to make a joke. I posted in libertarian threads back then, too. I was just trying to say libertarian bashing threads are old hat.

498 posted on 10/25/2006 11:11:16 PM PDT by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]

To: wyattearp
Plants make sugars via photosynthesis, and everything else eats those sugars in some fashon or other (that is a very basic description).

Did the first cells engage in photosynthesis?

Seems like you're skipping a couple of steps.

Cheers!

499 posted on 10/25/2006 11:12:14 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
Yes, the time grows short; doesn't it. LOL

I can hardly wait for all of the Dems and the MSM and even some of the supposed "conservatives" to awake with so much egg covering their sickly wan faces, that you can't discern egg white from skin tone.

We are going to lose NEITHER House!

500 posted on 10/25/2006 11:12:30 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,661-1,665 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson