Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Tribes boost GOP hopeful (Tony Strickland for State Controller)
Sac Bee ^ | 10/25/06 | Judy Lin and Clea Benson

Posted on 10/25/2006 9:45:07 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

A group of Indian gambling tribes has bought nearly $1 million in television time for the Republican candidate for state controller with two weeks to go in a close contest.

Tony Strickland, a former member of the state Assembly known for being outspoken on his conservative views, received the boost Monday from Team 2006, an independent campaign committee formed by six Southern California gambling tribes that have been seeking to expand their operations. The committee had raised more than $9 million, according to disclosure reports filed Tuesday.

The large contribution drew immediate criticism from Strickland's Democratic opponent, John Chiang, a member of the state Board of Equalization, even as a committee of public employee unions chipped in $262,000 on his behalf.

Parke Skelton, a consultant for Chiang's campaign, described the independent expenditures as "Orwellian."

"It's a horrible thing," Skelton said. "This election for this incredibly important office is out of the control of the candidates almost completely. They can totally drown out our message."

Also on Tuesday, software maker Intuit placed $1 million into a committee called the Alliance for California's Tomorrow and spent $66,000 on a television buy for Strickland. Intuit, the maker of TurboTax, opposes the state's ReadyReturn program, a popular precompleted tax filing system.

Under Proposition 34, candidates are limited in how much they can raise from individual donors. But independent committees can spend unlimited sums on a candidate's behalf as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign.

Strickland's campaign manager, Paul Hegyi, said neither Intuit nor Indian contributions will affect Strickland if elected.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; statecontroller; strickland; tonystrickland; tribes

1 posted on 10/25/2006 9:45:08 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Well, that proves there is hope for the Indian community! Indians are notoriously Democrats, much like Jews. They are stuck in victimhood, and can't get away from the past. You'd swear they were facing the same stuff that the ancestors did. How do I know this? It's first hand experience.


2 posted on 10/25/2006 9:53:25 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Proud to be Red)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oneamericanvoice

Actually, Indian tribes donate to whomever they see as most likely to promote their gaming interests, regardless of party.

In NYS, the Oneida Indian Nation, owners of Turning Stone Casino, are not at all shy about donating to both parties to insure their operation retains every competitive advantage.


3 posted on 10/25/2006 9:56:51 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Actually, Indian tribes donate to whomever they see as most likely to promote their gaming interests, regardless of party. In NYS, the Oneida Indian Nation, owners of Turning Stone Casino, are not at all shy about donating to both parties to insure their operation retains every competitive advantage.

So, umm, just like every other business on the planet, eh?
4 posted on 10/25/2006 9:59:36 PM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingu

But they're Indians! That makes them somewhat more detestable. Just like their casinos. How dare they try to operate a business! We'll complain about handouts to them, then complain that they run a business!


5 posted on 10/25/2006 10:06:34 PM PDT by kenth (There are three kinds of people in the world. Those who can count, and those who can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I might have to vote for the Dem on this race. Thanks for the heads up.


6 posted on 10/25/2006 10:08:17 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

LOLOL.. Vote as you will.. I will not invoke an acid test as some do about certain candidates. :-)


7 posted on 10/25/2006 10:12:00 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... http://www.pendleton8.com/ ...... http://www.bootmurtha.com/ .. FRee Moooomia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Isn't that the usual for you anyway... voting Dem?


8 posted on 10/25/2006 10:16:58 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (God bless America, land that I love. NEVER FORGET ... Some Gave All ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
drew immediate criticism from Strickland's Democratic opponent, John Chiang, a member of the state Board of Equalization, even as a committee of public employee unions chipped in $262,000 on his behalf.

Besides the duplicity, the dems must be seething that a republican is getting support from the tribes - another group going "off the reservation?"

9 posted on 10/25/2006 10:27:58 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kenth; kingu
So, umm, just like every other business on the planet, eh?

My point being that you can't stereotype Indians as Democrat [or Republican], which the initial poster did. Indians will support whichever party furthers their business interests, no different than "whites."

10 posted on 10/25/2006 10:29:29 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Since the GOP takes donations from tribes, does that mean you won't vote for any Republicans?


11 posted on 10/25/2006 10:35:53 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Dog

Ping!


12 posted on 10/25/2006 10:56:39 PM PDT by Snapping Turtle (Slow down and get a grip!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
My point being that you can't stereotype Indians as Democrat [or Republican], which the initial poster did. Indians will support whichever party furthers their business interests, no different than "whites."

Whole lot of people do around here, actually. Every Indian is a Democrat voter in buckskins, and likely about to commit fraud in the process. And while your point is valid, there are a whole lot of Indians who are done biting their tongue on many issues, not the least of which being the war and right to life issues. Of any 'group' under the liberal big tent, this is the one that's probably leaving the swiftest.
13 posted on 10/25/2006 11:45:14 PM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Snapping Turtle

Tony Strickland and his wife and all his school board minions are an embarrasment to the Republican party. They are corrupt, have not a shred of integrity and care for nothing other than advancing the personal needs of the Stricklands. Ventura County deserves better.


14 posted on 10/26/2006 7:43:35 AM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx; pacpam; hoppity; MayflowerMadam; capitan_refugio; Kviteseid; Val E. Girl; merry10; ...

Ventura County Ping


15 posted on 10/26/2006 7:45:12 AM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Torie; NormsRevenge
I might have to vote for the Dem on this race. Thanks for the heads up.

Yep, that damned Intuit tribe.
16 posted on 10/26/2006 8:31:04 AM PDT by kenth (There are three kinds of people in the world. Those who can count, and those who can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kenth

I think its less a question of "that damn...tribe" and more a question of whether or not one favors gaming. If you oppose gaming and oppose gaming money going to candidates, then the Pubbie looks bad on this one.


17 posted on 10/26/2006 9:00:38 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Snapping Turtle

Thanks! (We already voted and are hopeful for the best!)


18 posted on 10/26/2006 12:04:27 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Dog

I thought I was there in 2004 when we were all supporting Audra Strickland. So what happened?


19 posted on 10/26/2006 7:08:10 PM PDT by merry10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: merry10

A couple of articles in the LA TImes came out - money laundering between Tony and Audra and a complete lack of accountability or legislation.


20 posted on 10/26/2006 8:47:02 PM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Dog

Well, the LA Times??

I liked his idea in 2000 about amending the CA constitution to split the number of electoral votes.


21 posted on 10/27/2006 5:49:48 PM PDT by merry10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson