Think about it. All of these have been proposed on this one thread: 1) If there are changes, that must mean evolution. 2) If there are no changes, that must mean evolution. 3) If this branch didn't change, others must have, so that must mean evolution.
You have not accurately portrayed the explanations and responses given on this discussion.
posted on 10/26/2006 2:04:08 PM PDT
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
"You have not accurately portrayed the explanations and responses given on this discussion."
I believe I have. Despite being a Bible-believing Creationist, I do indeed have a normal IQ, perhaps even above average. I also have a talent for understanding even the most convoluted communications and stating (accurately) the bottom line.
Your colleagues have already confirmed some of my claims in their replies, allowing that these discoveries are indeed placed into a template which pre-supposes evolution as fact.
posted on 10/27/2006 8:55:10 AM PDT
(Pro Deo, Pro Familia, Pro Patria)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson