Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guilt of the 4 Isms
Original | 10-26-06 | Forest Glen Durland

Posted on 10/26/2006 12:56:04 PM PDT by forest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: -YYZ-
Loooong, yes. But well organized.

The Statement of the Problem is less than two pages. But the documentation that is necessary to back it up is long. Sorry about the very necessary details.

41 posted on 10/27/2006 11:49:37 AM PDT by forest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: forest

With a little more effort in the area of links and pictures you could be the next Mia T (just find a subject other than Hillary - it's taken)


42 posted on 10/27/2006 11:52:22 AM PDT by 70times7 (Sense... some don't make any, some don't have any - or so the former would appear to the latter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest

BTW - Thanks.

marker to finish later


43 posted on 10/27/2006 11:53:54 AM PDT by 70times7 (Sense... some don't make any, some don't have any - or so the former would appear to the latter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest

Sorry, I should have been more precise. The statement part is clear enough. It's the documentation part that I found confusing and disorganized.


44 posted on 10/27/2006 12:00:32 PM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 70times7

Instead of links, I could have printed out all of 4 political platforms and several books. But people are already complaining about length. The statement of the problem is less than two pages. The documentation is necessary so readers may know the truth.

F


45 posted on 10/27/2006 5:13:01 PM PDT by forest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-
I tried to keep the documentation well organized. Here's my process:

I took each statement from statement of the problem and numbered it, from top to bottom.

Then I copied each statement and placed it after its number in the documentation.

Following was the documentation necessary to uphold each statement.

I call that well organized. The length is what confuses many readers. However, the supporting material for such statements that I made is quite lengthy. There is no room for casual comments in such a paper.

My goal speaks for this necessity: I hope to completely destroy the Democratic Party. Instead of issuing derogatory remarks about them, I am acting.

But I need help. This paper must be brought to the attention of the public. Fox News is not answering.

46 posted on 10/27/2006 5:23:06 PM PDT by forest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: forest

Just messing with ya ;>) appreciate the info


47 posted on 10/30/2006 5:58:28 AM PST by 70times7 (Sense... some don't make any, some don't have any - or so the former would appear to the latter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Professor Kill
Fascism and Communism are very, very different ideologies.

National Socialist Germany was indeed Socialist.

Fascism is Italian.

Soviet Socialist Russia was Communist.

Maoist China is Communist.

Big Deal.

Why split hairs? They were all complete government control and resistance equals execution.

48 posted on 10/30/2006 6:12:17 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Why split hairs? They were all complete government control and resistance equals execution.

So a bullet is the same thing as a noose is the same thing as a knife is the same thing as a poison pill? You would defend yourself against each of those in the same way? Each of those brings about your demise in the same way?

I stand by my assertion: lumping together disparate ideologies that have distinct origins and distinct results simply because they are all undesirable is sloppy and intellectually lazy. It ignores significant differences between political systems and reduces our ability to see what conditions produce these ideologies and what actually happens under these systems.

49 posted on 10/30/2006 4:40:43 PM PST by Professor Kill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Professor Kill
I stand by my assertion: lumping together disparate ideologies that have distinct origins...

Russia - Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

Germany - National Socialist Workers Pary

Iraq - Ba'ath Socialist Party

Tell me how these are any different...

50 posted on 10/30/2006 5:00:39 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Before I answer your question, I need to be clear about something: are you actually arguing that there is no real difference between Soviet Communism/Stalinism, German National Socialism, and Iraqi Ba'athism?

Because if you are actually taking that position, I would first refer you to an undergraduate political science textbook before trying to explain the differences between all the political ideologies of the world.


51 posted on 10/30/2006 5:05:09 PM PST by Professor Kill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Professor Kill
Russia - Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

Germany - National Socialist Workers Pary

Iraq - Ba'ath Socialist Party

Tell me how these are any different...

Answer: The number of people exterminated.

They all hate the Jews.

52 posted on 10/30/2006 5:11:57 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

I'm sorry, sir, but I'm having a hard time taking your argument seriously if you honestly believe these political systems are interchangeable. I would encourage you to pick up a basic political science textbook and go from there.

If your logic was correct, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the Democratic Republic of Congo must both be democracies, which means both their political systems are identical to that of the United States.

Have a good day.


53 posted on 10/30/2006 6:25:11 PM PST by Professor Kill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood; Professor Kill
In my paper the 4 isms were included in one group because of their similar support of Democratism and destroying our Constitution. Those two characteristics alone are enough to call it treason and their supporters in America traitors.

Call it lazy if you wish, but it sure is practical. They must remain gathered around the same bull's eye.

54 posted on 10/30/2006 6:28:51 PM PST by forest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: All
Neither politicians nor the media have responded to this paper that should destroy the Democratic Party. So I penned another paper entitled “Scared?”. To access that paper, please go to search, enter Scared?, and press return. Click on Scared?

Please do NOT mix that thread with this one. Let’s keep them separated.

Both “Guilt of the 4 Isms” and “Scared?” are copyright October, 2006 by Forest Glen Durland.

Thanks, Forest

55 posted on 10/31/2006 10:03:22 AM PST by forest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson