Posted on 10/26/2006 12:56:04 PM PDT by forest
The Statement of the Problem is less than two pages. But the documentation that is necessary to back it up is long. Sorry about the very necessary details.
With a little more effort in the area of links and pictures you could be the next Mia T (just find a subject other than Hillary - it's taken)
BTW - Thanks.
marker to finish later
Sorry, I should have been more precise. The statement part is clear enough. It's the documentation part that I found confusing and disorganized.
Instead of links, I could have printed out all of 4 political platforms and several books. But people are already complaining about length. The statement of the problem is less than two pages. The documentation is necessary so readers may know the truth.
F
I took each statement from statement of the problem and numbered it, from top to bottom.
Then I copied each statement and placed it after its number in the documentation.
Following was the documentation necessary to uphold each statement.
I call that well organized. The length is what confuses many readers. However, the supporting material for such statements that I made is quite lengthy. There is no room for casual comments in such a paper.
My goal speaks for this necessity: I hope to completely destroy the Democratic Party. Instead of issuing derogatory remarks about them, I am acting.
But I need help. This paper must be brought to the attention of the public. Fox News is not answering.
Just messing with ya ;>) appreciate the info
National Socialist Germany was indeed Socialist.
Fascism is Italian.
Soviet Socialist Russia was Communist.
Maoist China is Communist.
Big Deal.
Why split hairs? They were all complete government control and resistance equals execution.
So a bullet is the same thing as a noose is the same thing as a knife is the same thing as a poison pill? You would defend yourself against each of those in the same way? Each of those brings about your demise in the same way?
I stand by my assertion: lumping together disparate ideologies that have distinct origins and distinct results simply because they are all undesirable is sloppy and intellectually lazy. It ignores significant differences between political systems and reduces our ability to see what conditions produce these ideologies and what actually happens under these systems.
Russia - Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Germany - National Socialist Workers Pary
Iraq - Ba'ath Socialist Party
Tell me how these are any different...
Before I answer your question, I need to be clear about something: are you actually arguing that there is no real difference between Soviet Communism/Stalinism, German National Socialism, and Iraqi Ba'athism?
Because if you are actually taking that position, I would first refer you to an undergraduate political science textbook before trying to explain the differences between all the political ideologies of the world.
Germany - National Socialist Workers Pary
Iraq - Ba'ath Socialist Party
Tell me how these are any different...
Answer: The number of people exterminated.
They all hate the Jews.
I'm sorry, sir, but I'm having a hard time taking your argument seriously if you honestly believe these political systems are interchangeable. I would encourage you to pick up a basic political science textbook and go from there.
If your logic was correct, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the Democratic Republic of Congo must both be democracies, which means both their political systems are identical to that of the United States.
Have a good day.
Call it lazy if you wish, but it sure is practical. They must remain gathered around the same bull's eye.
Please do NOT mix that thread with this one. Lets keep them separated.
Both Guilt of the 4 Isms and Scared? are copyright October, 2006 by Forest Glen Durland.
Thanks, Forest
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.