Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Somebody Please Do Something
Vanity | 11-4-2006 | Chuckles

Posted on 11/04/2006 10:37:15 PM PST by chuckles

Well, usually, if I wait long enough, somebody will say what I want said, and bring the topic to a head. Not this time. I've had it with waiting.

Kerry joined the Navy in 1966. You usually join for a 6 year hitch. He got an Honorable Discharge in 1978. Is there anybody out there with any power that has a problem with that? What happened to 1972?

I have written every news organization I can and sent e-mails to reporters until I give up. I went down each show on Fox News, even Cavuto. Nothing, Nada. I wrote the Swift Boat web site and asked them to bring it up in one of their interviews. Nothing.... I don't get it. If I were a hard hitting news reporter that had a chance to interview Kerry, That would be the first question out of my pie hole. The second, of course would be about signing a "180". The third question, just for grins, would be to ask which 7 Senators he voted to assassinate in the VVAW. I have sent the PDF file of the FBI report that shows he was there at that meeting when they took the vote.

Any ideas on how to get this looked into? Before you know it, he will have a committee looking into his 2008 run. He needs to be squashed yesterday, not 4-8 years from now. He should be impeached for treason, if it turns out he got a dishonarable discharge and Carter gave him a "Get out of the Dumpster" pass.

I can't beleive this guy has made it this long, but hey, it's Mass. They have Kennedy and Fwank also. It must be in the water.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: communist; kerry; liar; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-70 next last

1 posted on 11/04/2006 10:37:16 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chuckles; Chieftain

ping.


2 posted on 11/04/2006 10:39:33 PM PST by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

I don't think officers get an 'Honorable Discharge'. They 'Resign their Commission'. That time might include Naval Reserve as well.


3 posted on 11/04/2006 10:44:05 PM PST by real saxophonist (The fact that you play tuba doesn't make you any less lethal. -USMC bandsman in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"The third question, just for grins, would be to ask which 7 Senators he voted to assassinate in the VVAW. I have sent the PDF file of the FBI report that shows he was there at that meeting when they took the vote."

His Clintonesque answer no doubt would be :" I attended, but didnt vote..."

Lies are stock in trade for leftists.
4 posted on 11/04/2006 10:44:18 PM PST by wodinoneeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

None of this is any great secret. But if you want truth and justice you had better wait until you reach the hereafter.

As far as 08 is concerned, Kerry was dead before he shot off his mouth. All we can hope for is that he keeps flapping his gums and damages the real contenders.


5 posted on 11/04/2006 10:44:42 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Yes, and somewhere in the film archives of some network, there's footage of Lurch peeing on a burning American flag. The devil protects his own is my answer to all your questions.


6 posted on 11/04/2006 10:50:03 PM PST by dimmer-rats stealvotes (Catching onto the FOX Fonies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

I totally agree with ya...they should have wiped him out long ago. My best guess is that he got a general or dishonorable discharge which was later kicked up to honorable by Jimmeh. He had to have suffered some consequences for his gay paree meetings with the enemy. The fact that he was an officer at the time is striking, he wasn't in charge and he damn sure wasn't assigned to meet with the enemy.

He's completely inept, incapable of leadership and a traitorous swine on top of that. What I would like to know is whether or not the rats will toss him overboard or if they will continue to remain "stuck on stupid" and keep Lurch on while their party runs off the cliff completely. He's only dragging them down further.

If the rats insist on doing nothing, which I predict they will do unless "someone" wrests control of the sinking ship away from whomever's in charge, then they'll live to regret it.

I'd like to see kerry resign in disgrace and go down in flames, but that's just me.


7 posted on 11/04/2006 10:51:33 PM PST by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
LoL... True...

I see it as highly suspicious that son of read my lips no new taxes ran against a known moron in 2000 and against a known traitor in 2004.. How could he NOT BE ELECTED?.. A little to convenient to me.. NO ITs NOT.. its WAY too convienient to me..

And how could Sandy Burgular get away with obvious in your face espionage?..

Many things don't add up.. Like a republican administration openly FOR 20 to 30 million or more prototype democrats invading(insurgents) the United States.. Many of whom WILL VOTE in 2006 and 2008..

Whats more.. many even here on FR could care less.. and refuse to line up the dominoes..

Foggy bottom stinks to high heaven..

8 posted on 11/04/2006 10:53:13 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

4 year hitches are typical for us elnlisted pukes. Academy grads are different. Kery was neither. He was smart.


9 posted on 11/04/2006 10:53:46 PM PST by Toby06 (Happy camper. MORE NUKES LESS KOOKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

Kerry "Honorable Discharge"

Google this for a long list of things to read.


10 posted on 11/04/2006 10:55:23 PM PST by Sundog (Say a prayer for Westy -- he has been absent too long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

Great post. And BUMP for great freeping. Sometimes it seems like we are just banging your heads against the wall. I suspect that Teddy and his big money (or Kerry and HIS big gigolo money) are behind the spike. There is something fishy about Kerry's discharge and there isn't a "journalist" in the country who will investigate it. It makes no sense. If there's one guy who I think would get the answer, it's Christopher Hitchens.

I'm pretty sure Dan Rather would rather not.


11 posted on 11/04/2006 10:59:43 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
You're right about Kerry being dead in the water even before the gaffe. The party apparatus would never have run with this pompous ass a second time around.
12 posted on 11/04/2006 10:59:46 PM PST by aligncare (Beware the Media-Industrial Complex!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Toby06; chuckles

I left the Marines after six years and immediately got my Honorable Discharge. Everybody I know who left the service honorably got their Honorable Discharge immediately. Kerry left the service in 1972 and got his "Honorable Discharge" in 1978.... What took six friggin' years?? It's such an obvious question, I cannot believe that after all Kerry's Senate runs and his Presidential campaign, nobody has the answer in 2006.

It staggers the mind. I certainly understand chuckles' frustration.


13 posted on 11/04/2006 11:05:15 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

"Before you know it, he will have a committee looking into his 2008 run. He needs to be squashed yesterday, not 4-8 years from now."




I don't know about you, but Kerry is such a loser-niwit-geek, that I would WANT him to run in 2008.

Better him than Shrillary.


14 posted on 11/04/2006 11:08:22 PM PST by Eccl 10:2 (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem - Ps 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
There is an amazing amount of gray area there Dan Rather never even thought to investigate. Things that make you go Hmmm?.
15 posted on 11/04/2006 11:08:39 PM PST by Toby06 (Happy camper. MORE NUKES LESS KOOKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Are you suggesting there is only one party, Hosepipe? Connect the dots for us.


16 posted on 11/04/2006 11:14:06 PM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

HINT: Recall who was president in 1978, and recall what he did for all the anti-war types that had fled to Canada... It was CARTER and he give them AMNESTY. It isn't too hard to believe that a young Democrat who had been discharged from the Navy under less than honorable condiditons could get his records "corrected" in this environment.

As long as you are asking, look into why some of his awards were re-issued...

These questions will probably never be answered. Military records are protected better than the gold in Ft. Knox. The only way we will ever know the truth is if Kerry fesses up.


17 posted on 11/04/2006 11:17:50 PM PST by coldoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

The MSM are as treasonous as Kerry. FOX News is about a hair breadth less so than the others. That's their claim to fame. If they weren't why aren't they showing the many successes of our troops in Iraq? They could do an hour show every day on the Iraq war alone showing both our successes and our defeats. IOWs a "fair and balanced" look at what is really happening. It would be a ratings phenomena. They don't. They're liars like the rest with just a taste of "conservative candy."


18 posted on 11/04/2006 11:18:55 PM PST by TigersEye ("Everywhere I go there's a Predator in tow, life goes on without me!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coldoc

actually, all he has to do is sign a Form 180 that John O'Neill will provide for him (no funky submission to an off-beat office will suffice, as Kerry tried post 2004)


19 posted on 11/04/2006 11:19:34 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

True.


20 posted on 11/04/2006 11:21:16 PM PST by TigersEye ("Everywhere I go there's a Predator in tow, life goes on without me!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

Hope this isn't too far off topic but Al Gore went in the army on a two year enlistment, that means he was unassigned, with no choices or contracts, yet instead of automatically being sent to combat arms, he was given a highly sought journalist slot.

Another thing, he was transferred to Vietnam with only months remaining in his enlistment, well the army didn't work that way.

The army would only send you to a school or Vietnam if it benefited them, they would not invest that money in you just before you were discharged.


21 posted on 11/04/2006 11:21:55 PM PST by ansel12 (America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
Help spread the word. Feel free to E-mail these "Jon Carry" pictures around to all you know who would appreciate it and get inspired to GET OUT AND VOTE!!!!

"We support those not as smart as John Kerry"- At the Army-Air Force Game

22 posted on 11/04/2006 11:23:08 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Well, his father was a Senator. He had pull. It was considered de rigeur for a future politician to get some experience in war. So they put him where he would be out of harms way. That's how it's done. No conspiracy there.


23 posted on 11/04/2006 11:26:47 PM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

I don't think officers get an 'Honorable Discharge'. They 'Resign their Commission'. That time might include Naval Reserve as well.


Officers get Honorable Discharges after resigning their commissions. He may have left active duty in '72 and didn't resign until '78.


24 posted on 11/04/2006 11:27:13 PM PST by Sapper26 (All men should marry, you can't blame everything on the government - Jed Clampett.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

John O'Neill addresses these issues in his book "Unfit for Command". It's a great read.


25 posted on 11/04/2006 11:28:23 PM PST by AprilfromTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sundog; Lancey Howard

Here is one of those links;

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/000661.htm


26 posted on 11/04/2006 11:29:31 PM PST by ansel12 (America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I wrote Rush and sent him the FBI report. I sent it to Hanity. I sent it to O'Riely and all the others. I sent it to ABCCBSNBCCNN. There are local radio shows I sent it to in the Houston and Beaumont area. NOT ONE MENTION! I realize WE know about this stuff, but Joe Six Pack doesn't have a clue. This "common knowledge" should be begging for more commonality. I also know an officer has to resign his commission, but the discharge still comes the same as anybody else.

Kerry is not just some politician to me. He is right up there with Jane Fonda in my book. Having a traitor in the Senate is tough for me to take. Having him almost be president was a rough time for me. This guy will draw a pension when he finally retires from the Senate unless he is impeached. I'm 55 years old, so I remember things that younger folks don't have a clue about. How can Carter even peek outside after the debacle of his 4 year reign of terror, but today, he's a statesman? Kennedy will go down as an old patriarch of the Senate, instead of the drunken murderer he is.

If nobody takes care of this stuff now, the history books will paint them as hero's. Kerry is no hero.

27 posted on 11/04/2006 11:34:24 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace

That is delicious! ; )


28 posted on 11/04/2006 11:35:26 PM PST by TigersEye ("Everywhere I go there's a Predator in tow, life goes on without me!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

I'd say Kerry's "honorable discharge" is about the equivalent of a G.E.D.


29 posted on 11/04/2006 11:37:12 PM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Thanks for the link! I remember reading that back in '04. Lots of speculation, huh?

I remain astounded that such a simple matter has never been fully resolved, and that the question has not been asked point blank, or answered in a straightforward manner by that sick, traitorous scumbag John "King of Comedy" Kerry.

Regards,
LH


30 posted on 11/04/2006 11:39:48 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner

Two sides of the same coin: The Global Elite


31 posted on 11/04/2006 11:42:28 PM PST by endthematrix ("If it's not the Crusades, it's the cartoons.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

Didn't realize I was writing our President's biography, too. Imagine that. Well, maybe Hosepipe had a point.


32 posted on 11/04/2006 11:45:04 PM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

Clinton won with 42.7% in 1992

Clinton got 49.2% in 1996 which tore him up because he is doomed to be known forever as never having won by a majority.

Remember those percentages when you hear him described as the political genius of our times.

Bush got 47.9% in 2000 and 50.7% in 2004 which will haunt Clinton for the rest of his life because By defeating Gore in 2000 it repudiated Clinton's "legacy", and Bush broke 50%.

Before Clinton it was Reagan 50.7% in 1980, then Reagan an astounding 58.8% in 1984, then Reagan's legacy vote George H. W. Bush 53.4% in 1988.




Remember these guys are different than us, look at post 22, Kerry knows his life amounted to nothing, he eats pate and drinks Champagne, but what he wanted was to be somebody, believe me his pension doesn't salve his soul.


33 posted on 11/04/2006 11:45:21 PM PST by ansel12 (America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

"Mother, will you tell me again about how I shall be President one day?"

34 posted on 11/04/2006 11:48:00 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

who's picture is that?


35 posted on 11/04/2006 11:51:34 PM PST by ansel12 (America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Where did you get that picture of me?


36 posted on 11/04/2006 11:52:53 PM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner; All
Connect the dots for us.

When you're dealing with Kerry and liberals; it's tough connecting the dots.

See what I mean?


37 posted on 11/04/2006 11:59:06 PM PST by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I think it's John Kerry as a little boy.

(Actually, I just googled "Little Lord Fauntleroy".)


38 posted on 11/05/2006 12:01:04 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

It is a fascinating and disturbing photo.

It is a photo that you would not want someone to show it to you and ask you to commit to an opinion of the boy.

No matter what you are told as to who, or what the boy is, once he is labeled, you will be able to see it in the photograph.


39 posted on 11/05/2006 12:14:46 AM PST by ansel12 (America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I agree. I have had that photo bookmarked for some time (mainly to use it to make fun of John Kerry) but I have examined it. I suppose it is a very old photo, and I figure that boy grew old and died long ago. It's a disrurbing contemplation. Heck, the kid could have been some normal shlub whose mother saved up some pennies and took him downtown to a studio, had him dressed up with borrowed clothes for the pose, and then had that photo snapped. Then back to the streets he went with his buddies to get dirty playing stickball and steal apples from somebody's cart.

Or maybe the boy was some aristocrat's son who grew up to run the family's bank.


40 posted on 11/05/2006 12:48:17 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: coldoc
The only way we will ever know the truth is if Kerry fesses up.

And that will never happen.

41 posted on 11/05/2006 12:55:00 AM PST by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

No matter what, the boy has presence, charisma.

That boy, no matter where he ended up, seems to be a person of his own, for good or bad, or just someone we can take sides on, like a politician.

I'm glad he was captured on film.


42 posted on 11/05/2006 1:04:28 AM PST by ansel12 (America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

He was an officer, not enlisted. Only enlisted get honorable discharge. Officers have many years in reserve after active service. In this instance there is nothing unusual. Sorry.


43 posted on 11/05/2006 2:29:35 AM PST by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

I understand your frustration. If it's any consolation, when it comes to being more than a Senator, Kerry's toast. He will never be President, and put his second foot into the grave, so to speak, with that defiant non-apology. It's not as big a millstone as Chappaquiddick, but it's enough to get the job done.


44 posted on 11/05/2006 2:34:27 AM PST by L.N. Smithee (MSM cries crocodile tears about negative campaigns -- they ARE a negative campaign against the GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

So give us the facts. It is a little hard to believe you just solved one of the great questions, about the democrat candidate of 2004 by pointing out that he was an officer.


"He was an officer, not enlisted. Only enlisted get honorable discharge. Officers have many years in reserve after active service. In this instance there is nothing unusual. Sorry."


45 posted on 11/05/2006 2:51:16 AM PST by ansel12 (America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: goresalooza

I'd like to see kerry resign in disgrace.....That'll never happen. You need a sense of shame to feel disgrace. This hollow buffon has no sense of shame or humor.


46 posted on 11/05/2006 2:51:29 AM PST by Safetgiver (Stinko De mayo, Stinko to the Commies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I don't know the details in Kerry's instance, but from my own experience I had done my 8 years of Reserve in advance of my AD. So when my AD time was up I just took off the uniform and quit going to work (actually they hired me as a civilian the next week). So the years may add up, if he did his 4 years AD he was obligated to do and then another 8 in reserve. So, the years may not be as big of a deal as you are implying. I in no way mean to support Kerry in anything, I just think this issue is a waste of energy.


47 posted on 11/05/2006 3:05:21 AM PST by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Where did you get Karl's election day plan? That's highly classified.


48 posted on 11/05/2006 3:08:15 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
I believe that Mr. Kerry was given a "General Discharge" under other than honorable conditions. When he came back from Vietnam (you know he was in Vietnam, don't you?) he was still on active duty for a period, and, I believe that is the time when he was doing the protesting, testifying before congress, etc.

If you notice the date 1978 which his "Honorable Discharge" is dated, that is the time period from the infamous Georgia nutball president's "Amnesty" edict for draft dodgers, etc. This is when Mr. Kerry got his 1972 GD upgraded to Honorable. He's a lying bastard and he won't sign his SF180 because the information in his files will show what I believe is true.

49 posted on 11/05/2006 3:11:01 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
Buzz Patterson: October Surprise? The Truth Behind Kerry's Military Discharge. What's Kerry Hiding?

...The final element in Kerry's absolute failure to meet the standards our military deserves in a commander-in-chief, in this retired officer's opinion, is in the factual nature of Kerry's discharge (although I would love for some resourceful citizen find a way to republish and distribute Kerry's radical, anti-American tome The New Soldier -- which my publisher Regnery Publishing has offered to do for free -- and hand it out at the polls on November 2).

As for every veteran, the truth will be found the form DD214, the official Department of Defense document of release from military obligation given to Kerry when he exited military service on July 1, 1972. It is conspicuously absent from the documents released so far. Everyone serving in the military receives a DD214 the day they separate or retire from service. My suspicion along with a growing number of military personnel is that Kerry received an "other than honorable" discharge in the early 1970s as a consequence of his vehement anti-US, anti-military activities with the Vietnam Veterans Against the War and his potentially treasonous tête-à-têtes with North Vietnamese Communist officials in Paris. If not, let him release his records. If so, America should demand the release...

With what we do know, Kerry's paperwork doesn't pass the smell test. The few records so far released by his campaign identify FOUR "honorable" discharge dates (every other military member I know, myself included, received one). Kerry's released documentation notes discharges of January 3, 1970, February 16, 1978, July 13, 1978, and, most peculiarly, March 12, 2001. He has as many discharge dates as months he spent in Vietnam. In my twenty years in the Air Force and through the thousands of people I came to know and serve with, I have never heard of anyone in the military having more than one DD 214 with one discharge date. Kerry, according to his own campaign, has at least four.

There are five potential classes of discharge: Honorable, General, Other than Honorable, Bad Conduct, and Dishonorable. Why does it matter? It's the sum total of one's military service boiled down in a phrase. Most employers require former military members to attach their DD214 to their employment application. Anything other than "Honorable" is seen as a character flaw. Bad Conduct and Dishonorable obviously are causes for additional concern...

Here's the crux of the confusion. On February 18, 1966, Kerry obligated himself to a six-year commitment to the Navy, and to the tenets of the military judicial system, with an expiration date of July 1, 1972. On January 3, 1970, Kerry asked for, and was granted, an early transfer from his active duty service to the Naval Reserve. As a reservist, he was still under oath as a commissioned officer and subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. He still carried a military ID card and was still a member of the U.S. armed forces. Kerry's service commitment came to an end, as scheduled, in July, 1972. As such, a DD Form 214 with a discharge status was due.

Kerry's "honorable" discharge, though, doesn't come until February 16, 1978. Why? Possibly because President Jimmy Carter, through Proclamation 4483, granted a full and complete pardon to all military personnel who committed offenses and violations of the Military Selective Service Act during the Vietnam War. He pardoned deserters, draft dodgers and those who went absent without leave (AWOL).

Interestingly, Kerry's honorable discharge letter from the Department of the Navy, dated February 16, 1978, notes that Kerry's discharge was taken "by direction of the President" and "with the approved recommendations of a board of officers convened under the authority of reference [10 USC Sec. 1163] to examine the official records of officers of the Naval Reserve.." This is extremely unusual. Review boards are not convened for discharges and certainly not "by direction of the President." The "authority of reference," 10 USC Sec. 1163, refers to "the grounds for involuntary separation from the service." What was being reviewed, then, was Kerry's involuntary separation from the service or, more likely, the disposition of his service. This simply would not have occurred if Kerry's discharge in 1972 had been "honorable." Why did Kerry's discharge meet a board? In all likelihood, he sought relief to improve his status of discharge from "dishonorable" or "less than honorable" to "honorable." If he signed his Form 180, we'd know. If he'd release his DD214 from 1972, we'd know.

Finally, and most bizarre of all of Kerry's military records so far released is a DD 215, "Correction to DD Form 214," initiated for John Forbes Kerry on March 12, 2001. Among other things, the new form changes Kerry's official US Navy separation date to March 1, 1970! As noted earlier, he wasn't eligible for discharge until July, 1972, and was so. Why, then, the new document in 2001? Why, 29 years later, is there the need to correct or change the record?

Here's why. By moving Kerry's discharge date to early in 1970, all of Kerry's post-Vietnam activities would be theoretically exempt from military justice. By moving his discharge date to March of 1970, Kerry's meeting with the enemy, North Vietnamese Communists in Paris in May of 1970, would be exempt. His joining the Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) in June of 1970 and his radical, anti-war anti-government activities that followed would be exempt. The Winter Soldier Investigation in January, 1971, and Kerry's infamous testimony to Congress in April, 1971 would be exempt. His arrest for his protest activities in May, 1971, would be exempt. His attendance at a VVAW meeting in Kansas City where the assassination of several prominent and hawkish U.S. senators was discussed and voted on would be exempt....


50 posted on 11/05/2006 3:29:18 AM PST by BlessedBeGod (Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson