Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MP’s Bill (Canada) will establish new impaired driving law at 0.05% BAC level
CCN Mathews ^ | 10/31/06 | MADD Canada

Posted on 11/10/2006 6:29:02 PM PST by elkfersupper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: abishai

To make money, you need a special title …

Besides, how may taxi drivers would sit in a bar (and not drink), waiting for their charge to get drunk enough to leave and then escort them home? Ain’t gana happen. Need a special group, someone willing to wait it out … to insure them a ride home.

To answer your next protest … call a cab. Ever try to get a cab late a night when you are drunk?

Worked my way though three years of collage as a taxi driver, this is a concept that could work.


21 posted on 11/10/2006 8:13:32 PM PST by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
I see the complete demise of an American icon … the local tavern … or perhaps, the beginning of a new cottage industry, the professional designated driver?

Maybe local pub owners (out of a sense of self-preservation) could create what the WWII French Army called "de-ethalyzation rooms", where patrons could lock themselves in, but would have to blow a certain BAC, and pass a hand-eye coordination test, to get out.

22 posted on 11/10/2006 8:21:10 PM PST by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Hell. Lets make it: "If you think about drinking and driving you are under arrest!"


23 posted on 11/10/2006 8:37:19 PM PST by raftguide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
< Ever try to get a cab late a night when you are drunk?

It's easy! Taxi company's bread and butter are late-night drunks. I know, I used to own a bar and grill.

24 posted on 11/10/2006 9:29:13 PM PST by Ignatz (Click your mouse three times and repeat, "There's no place like 127.0.0.1")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
You can get that from mashed potatoes stuck in your bridgework.

Definitely one for the FR Hall of Fame! Now I have to clean up the coke and bits of cheese sandwich I sprayed all over my keyboard. :-(

25 posted on 11/10/2006 9:57:01 PM PST by Northern Alliance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
Next step - Bars are not allowed to have parking lots!You can't circumsize people like these guys cause there's no end to these pr!cks!..............FRegards
26 posted on 11/10/2006 11:37:00 PM PST by gonzo (I'm not confused anymore. Now I'm sure we have to completely destroy Islam, and FAST!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Keep in mind the entire (supposed) purpose of DUI's. It is to prevent folks from driving poorly.

Now what about old folks who forgot their glasses, Or people with the flu? They are both not driving as good as they can.

So what is the best solution? Pretty simple, actually. In those vans cops have with portable breathalizers, fit them with something else.

A driving simulator. With virtual cones, red lights, green lights, stop signs, whatever.

If anyone is suspected of driving poorly, whether sober or not, put them in it, and if they fail, ticket them.

That includes folks stone cold sober, healthy, with perfect eyesight. I know many who should never be driving.


27 posted on 11/10/2006 11:39:06 PM PST by MonroeDNA (Libertarians are more conservative than pubbies. Strictest interpretation of the constitution,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
Its chances of passage are scant. Most time in Parliament is reserved for Government bills.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

28 posted on 11/11/2006 3:46:07 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
After the Great Britain Beer Festival, in London, all the brewery presidents decided to go out for a beer. The guy from Budweiser says, "Give me 'The King Of Beers'."

The bartender gives him one. The guy from Schlitz says, "Give me 'The Beer That Made Milwaukee Famous'."

He gets it. The guy from Guinness sits down and says, "Give me a Coke."

The bartender is a little taken aback, but gives him what he ordered. The other brewery presidents look over at him and ask, "Why aren't you drinking a Guinness?"

The Guinness president replies, "Well, if you guys aren't drinking beer, neither will I."

29 posted on 11/11/2006 6:20:26 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
"The proposed .05% BAC offence is designed to deter impaired driving"

I don't suppose there's any evidence that driving at .05 is driving impaired? Not that it matters.

30 posted on 11/11/2006 6:22:43 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
I don't suppose there's any evidence that driving at .05 is driving impaired? Not that it matters.

Really, the evidence doesn't even establish that the .08 standard was an improvement over .10. The GAO looked at the evidence at the time the federal government was making the change and said so. In fact, DWI deaths increased after the standard was lowered after declining for years.

31 posted on 11/11/2006 12:31:54 PM PST by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper; Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
32 posted on 11/11/2006 1:05:08 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/optimism_nov8th.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Actually, anything over .00 has some impairment involved.


33 posted on 11/11/2006 1:21:10 PM PST by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
Just an FYI. I was looking at legal levels around the world and .05 is pretty much the international norm. I personally think it is too low but thats just me. wikipedia It appears the U.S. has one of the higher allowances (I would not have guessed)
34 posted on 11/11/2006 3:16:52 PM PST by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83
"Actually, anything over .00 has some impairment involved."

Technically, yes.

If they're really concerned about highway safety they should lower the speed limit to 20mph.

Technically.

35 posted on 11/11/2006 4:06:45 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Decreasing the speed to 20 would be extremely dangerous as well, due to closing rates...


36 posted on 11/11/2006 7:27:58 PM PST by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson