Posted on 11/12/2006 4:58:59 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Sunday, November 12th, 2006
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean; presidential counselor Dan Bartlett.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev.; White House chief of staff Josh Bolten.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Sens. Joe Biden. D-Del., and Carl Levin, D-Mich.; Bolten.
LATE EDITION (CNN) : Bolten; Pakistani Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz; Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.
How I hate and despise than piece of trash.
Trent Lott needs to sit in a corner in his frilly cheerleading outfit,and stay quiet. He is all for the Feds paying for his under-insured Mansion in Gulfport, and where is his Outrage over Charlie Rangel's outrageous racist remarks about his home State. what a wuss! Lamar Alexander is hardly conservative, and I can easily picture him in a frilly Cheerleader outfit to back up Trentia Lott when her little legs are tired from jumping so high........Get them out and make way for the Men, not the Girly Men or the Metrosexuals. I will bet they both smell better than Hillary. Yikes, that is not saying much..How about better than Babs Mikulski? I will quit this tact before I have to issue a BARF alert.
Instead Rush took an impulsive shot at Fox and then had to spend days defending himself.
Hogwash. Liberman is going to be the chairman of Homeland Security. The Iraq study group was proposed by Reps headed by my Rep, Frank Wolfe. It wouldn't have been set up if the Reps and WH didn't want it. Sandra Day O'Conner is one of the Rep members on the group as was Gates. Bush may not rubberstamp the recommendations of the group, but he will use it as a smokescreen to cover our "redeployment." The Iraq Study Group like the 9/11 Commission, will take on a life of its own. Beware of foreign policy being formulated by a "bipartisan" committee. Firing Rumsfeld was a politically expedient move and sop to the Dems.
Also, there is a mis-conception that the the Sec.Def nominee is anti-Cheney person. Untrue again - both Cheney & Hadley worked with him earlier.
Gates is a career bureaucrat. He will reflect the institutional view in much the same way that Scowcroft does. The CIA is not very happy with our current policies. Look for Gates to change our policies to more reflect the CIA's viewpoints.
How does buying a house help someone with a broken automobile?
Sorry, couldn't resist. (grinning, ducking and running away)
I was referring to MSNBC which is on cable. I don't watch much TV and am not sure any of the shows you mentioned are on cable.
How Rush Limbaugh's day starts:
1) Wake up.
2) Go to http://www.lexisnexis.com/ to see what the world has said about him.
3) Get out of bed.
Can you ever recall the Dems not supporting a nominee of their party?
St. Louis........is the reason. IOW, FRAUD
There is still hope for JD. That election has not been decided. Praying he prevails.
Leaders. We need leaders who come out and state the truth. Hey, go with me here, the President of the U.S. has a right nice bully pulpit and no way could the drive-by ignore anything he says.
So why did he swallow big and fire that Brown guy when Katrina was all about lazy individuals who sat on rooftops and waited for the Feds to come rescue them? Why didn't he state the simple truth and declare America to be a nation of rugged individuals and the federal government was never MEANT to come in right after a disaster and rescue people from rooftops? Then he could have went on and stated that after the individual he could have said the response then goes to local then to state authorities. THEN he could have pointed out how quickly the Coast Guard was hefting people out of danger and heh, maybe mention that it doesn't help when the local congress critter in the form of William Jefferson-D-Louisiana absconds with helicoptors meant to rescue others to save his ill-gained cash.
As for stem cell, well same thing. While voices lost in the wind screamed that the federal government has NOT banned stem cell research, even embryonic research, that such research can be privately funded, the voices that SHOULD have been speaking remained silent.
Same with Saddam's weapons of mass destruction. Same with, same with. They LET the Dems and drive-by media run the show.
So okay the Pres of the U.S. can't just go and get mired down with every detail but how about that awful tone-deaf Hastert, vaunted Speaker of the House? The only time I saw that fatso out and about was to defend William Jefferson-D-Louisiana and to practically lick boots over the Foley matter.
Frist, how about him? Did he ever publicly dispute that Saddam lie? Did he ever look the American people in the eye and state the heirarchy that SHOULD have worked for Katrina?
They let it go on and on and on and even while the Pres begged them to do something about SS reform the House didn't want to go there because they didn't want to lose the AARP vote. So that THEY could keep their power.
Did that complex prescription medicare thing help them a whit? NO. Read my lips, they STILL lost.
I'm not done yet but fingers are tired. Let me catch what little wits I have left.
And hey, may I point out that even when the base like to went ballistic over Spector on the judiciary committee and that little bridge to Alaska to serve 50 people living on an island, one such resident being Stevens' mother-in-law, they spit in our faces and did it anyway!
Okay...stop me now.
Mitchell was not for open borders. He was also a former mayor of Tempe. He was a very strong candidate in a district with changing demographics. It also doesn't hurt when the Dem candidate says he supports the McCain-Bush plan on comprehensive immigration reform. FYI: Hayworth voted against the House bill.
MSM in media acknowledged that Menendez is corrupt but said to vote for him anyway. Kean is the closest thing to a dem here, and while I despise him, he is not corrupt. Didn't matter a bit to the dems, they love their crooked pols.
"It would have been better if Lamont had won. It would have radicalized the Dems more and gave greater power to moveon.org, etc."
I Don't think it's going to matter wrt radicalizeing the Dims that Lamont lost. First, Lieberman said today that he's going to try to support all his constituents and be independent. And, moveon, ACLU, et al are expecting payback for their assistance in the Dims win:
Liberal groups expect postelection results
Los Angeles Times ^ | 12 November 2006 | Peter Wallsten and Janet Hook,
Posted on 11/12/2006 4:20:41 AM PST by shrinkermd
WASHINGTON — After toppling the long-dominant Republicans in a hard-fought election, the Democratic Party's incoming congressional leaders have immediately found themselves in another difficult struggle — with their own supporters...
...Lobbyists for the American Civil Liberties Union, for example, are all but counting on Democrats to repeal the most controversial provisions of the Patriot Act, the anti-terrorist law pushed by the White House that some critics call unconstitutional. They also want to end President Bush's domestic wiretapping program...
...Similar vows are coming from lobbyists for abortion rights, who want to expand family-planning options for poor women and scale back Bush's focus on abstinence education, and from gun-control advocates, who hope to revive a lapsed ban on assault weapons. Labor unions, a core Democratic constituency, are demanding universal healthcare and laws discouraging corporations from seeking inexpensive labor overseas....
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1737233/posts
That's good, I like JD. Before he moved to Arizona and started his political career, he was our local sportscaster!
Meant to say MSM in New Jersey....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.