Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Victor Davis Hanson: War Stories - Two versions of what we should do next.
National Review Online ^ | December 01, 2006 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 12/01/2006 5:58:19 PM PST by neverdem

War Stories
Two versions of what we should do next.

By Victor Davis Hanson

Five years after September 11, and three-and-a-half years after toppling Saddam Hussein, the U.S. is almost as angry at itself as it is at the enemy. Two quite antithetical views of the war on terror — and indeed, the entire American role in the Middle East — are now crystallizing.

Ideology and political affiliation are no longer necessarily touchstones to either opinion — not at a time when The Nation and The American Conservative share the same views on Iraq and the role of the United States abroad. Republican senators like Chuck Hagel call for withdrawal, while Democrats like a Joe Liebermann do not.

Republican realists are welcomed by liberal Democrats, who want nothing to do with the neo-Wilsonian neo-conservatives that once would have seemed more characteristic of liberal’s erstwhile idealism. It is not just that public intellectuals, politicians, generals, and journalists have different views, but their views themselves are different in almost every 24-hour news cycle. Even the Bush administration at times seems torn, gravitating between both schools of thought.

While there are dozens of variants to the following two divergent positions, they represent a clear enough picture of the present divide.

The Majority Opinion
The new majority school of thought — often described as the more nuanced and more sophisticated — seems to conclude that the “global war on terror” (if that’s even what it ever really was) is insidiously winding down to a police matter. Billions spent in lives and treasure in Iraq did not make us any safer; the passing of time, the dissipation of passions, and increased vigilance did.

We haven’t had another 9/11. Al Qaeda is probably scattered. Both Iraq and Afghanistan are exhibiting the usual, generic Middle East insanity that is largely beyond our own powers of remedy.

Rogue states in the region will ultimately be dealt with, as in the pre-Bush II past, by a sort of containment — whether through retaliatory and punitive air strikes, foreign aid concessions, shuttle diplomacy, no-fly zones, or embargoes and boycotts.

If there ever were need for strong military action and invasion, that time is clearly past, at least for now. The long-term negative effects would more than outweighed any short-term benefits — as we see from the repercussion of the mess in Iraq and possibly Afghanistan as well.

In this way of thinking, an all-encompassing Islamic fundamentalism that threatens the very survival of the West is at best mostly a fantasy — at worst, a license for the U.S. to intervene globally (often against our interests) with the excuse of “fighting terror.”

Certainly, there exists nothing as melodramatic as “Islamic fascism.” That is a misnomer that needlessly alienates millions of moderate Muslims. And such reckless and inexact nomenclature clumsily ignores both the history and all the key fissures — Shiite/Sunni; Hamas/Hezbollah; theocracy/autocracy/ monarchy; Persian/Arab/Kurd/Turk; etc. — of the complex Islamic world.

Instead, the United States, in pragmatic fashion, needs to address regional problems, particularly with more sophisticated, and less ideological, remedies.

Hamas and its rivals exist largely because of the occupied West Bank: force Israel back to its 1967 borders, and Palestinian grievances — and the violence — largely vanish, as the United States at last is freed from much of the old Pavlovian hatred so endemic in the Arab World. Radical bluster from the West Bank can sometimes sound creepy, but it is largely braggadocio, or perhaps a cry from the heart, and thus will quietly go away once the Palestinians have their own autonomous state with internationally recognized borders that reflect pre-1967 reality.

Hezbollah is not really a global terrorist network, but an offshoot of the trouble in Lebanon. It can be handled in part by granting concessions to Syria (such as an Israeli withdrawal from the Golan Heights), winning promises from Israel to be proportionate in responding to occasional (but mostly ineffectual) border provocations, and seeking more equitable political representation for Lebanese Shiites.

Iran is a danger, but not a fatal one. It can be balanced by Sunni sheikdoms in the Gulf and checked by multilaterally sponsored and enforced sanctions authorized by the United Nations.

As far as America goes, the old method of balancing one autocracy against another, with occasional but quiet and respectful lectures about good behavior and reform, is, however regrettably, often about as much as we can do. Sporadic violence against individual Americans can be dealt with through indictments, international policing, and, in extremis, an occasional air strike.

In general, internal security measures, such as wiretaps, Guantanamo-like detention centers abroad, and the Patriot Act, were of limited, if any, efficacy in thwarting another 9/11. They now probably pose as great a threat to our freedoms as do the terrorists.

Indeed, September 11 in proper hindsight seems more and more to have been a sort of fluke, a lucky strike by al Qaeda, predicated both on their sanctuary in Afghanistan and our own somnolence. Both have since been largely addressed. So the specter of another attack of a similar magnitude may well have passed. In some ways, our over-reaction to the bogeyman of “Islamic fascism” has made us less safe, by gratuitously creating new enemies where none previously existed.

However unwise, removing Saddam Hussein may have had some initial utility. But now any benefit is overshadowed by a messy civil war, whose violence is only exacerbated by the presence of American troops that have long overstayed both their welcome and their usefulness.

The best solution to Iraq is to begin now a steady, but sure, unilateral withdrawal under the rubric of “redeployment” — with sincere hopes that three years of our blood and treasure should have been enough to jumpstart democracy, and with even more sincere regrets if they have not. In short, Iraq has turned into an unfortunate, but predictable, fiasco, and it is time to cut it loose with as little blowback as possible.

Anti-Americanism in the Middle East and Europe is largely a phenomenon of George Bush’s idiosyncratic manners and his once-loud advocacy of preemption and unilateralism, particularly in March 2003. With his retirement, things will gradually settle down to the general equilibrium of the Bush I and Clinton eras.

There are indeed dangers on the horizon with nuclear proliferation, threats to wipe out Israel, and endemic terrorism. But as soon as the United States and the West are out of Iraq, become a neutral and honest broker between the Israelis and Palestinians, and avoid gratuitous slurs against Islam (such as the pope’s unfortunate remarks or the needlessly hurtful Danish cartoons), our reputation will improve and Muslim hostility will subside — and with it any popular support for militants like Osama bin Laden.

The Minority Brief
We really are in a global war. Its dimensions are hard to conceptualize since our enemies, while aided and abetted by sympathetic Middle Eastern dictatorships, claim no national affinity. Indeed, the terrorists deliberately mask the role of their patrons. The latter, given understandable fears of the overwhelming conventional power of the United States military, deny culpability.

In an age of globalization and miniaturized weapons of mass destruction, it is even more difficult to convince Western publics that they may well face peril from state-sponsored terrorists every bit as great as what the Wehrmacht, Imperial Japan, or the Red Army once posed.

While there are regional theaters of conflict predicated on local grievances — as in the multiplicity of fighting during World War II in China, Ethiopia, Poland, Finland, France, North Africa, the Balkans, Russia, the Pacific, etc. — there is nevertheless once more a transnational ideology that seeks to force its worldviews on others.

Like fascism or Communism, Islamism galvanizes millions with its reductionist claims of Western liberal culpability for widely diverse Muslim gripes from Afghanistan to the West Bank. Rather than seeing a plethora of grievances that can be individually addressed, it is more valuable and accurate to understand the problem as a general complaint that in turn manifests itself in different regions and circumstances. While Cypriots or Tibetans don’t blow themselves up over lost land or honor, those energized with Islamist ideology often do. While Hindu, Christian, or Buddhist fundamentalists don’t appreciate popular culture mocking their religion, Islamists are the most likely to assassinate or threaten the novelist or cartoonist as the supposed blasphemer.

Islamic fascism exists, then, as a reactionary creed that sees traditional Islamic culture threatened with Western-inspired global liberalization and modernization. Drawing on the Middle East’s sense of misery and victimization by others, its narrative harkens back to a purer age.

Once upon a time, the truly devout defeated their enemies and lived a morally pure life under a caliphate of like believers. That universal rule of Islam is at last once more attainable — given the general decadence of the postmodern West, the illegitimacy and vulnerability of most Middle Eastern governments, and the simple fact that vast petroleum reserves, coupled with jihadist fervor, can be translated into militarily powerful, high-tech forces that will obtain superiority over the crusading infidel.

On the home front, demoralization and a sort of cultural relativism are far more worrisome than the Patriot Act and related measures. By the prior benchmarks of the wartime administrations of Lincoln, Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman, and Nixon, these measures are relatively innocuous — and yet have done much to prevent another attack on the United States.

It was not the Patriot Act that banned operas, condemned cartoons, allowed films to be ostracized, or muzzled teachers, but Western self-censorship and fear. Jihadists brilliantly drew on boilerplate anti-Western arguments from Western elites, and when they recycled tired charges of imperialism, racism, and colonialism they found them surprisingly effective at undermining Western morale.

Furthermore, September 11 was no fluke, but the logical culmination of two disastrous prior American policies: appeasement and cynical realism.

By not responding to a decade of prior attacks in East Africa, New York, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen, and withdrawing ignominiously from Lebanon to Mogadishu, we gave the fatal impression that a terrorist could strike the United States with near impunity — given our addiction to the good life that we would not endanger at any cost. And by ignoring the abject failures of Middle East autocracies, we inadvertently ensured the second requisite to 9/11: dictatorial regimes that allowed terrorists free rein to scapegoat their own failures onto the infidel West.

The remedy, then, is to respond forcefully to terrorists and their sponsors, while simultaneously appealing to the people of the Islamic world that the United States is no longer cynically realist — but is actively working to promote consensual government throughout the region to address their lack of representation in their own affairs. That is not naiveté, but rather both the right and smart thing to do. Unlike the majority opinion that offers the chimera of stability through short-term expediency, the more costly, difficult, and ambitious minority view addresses conditions that more likely will lead to a lasting peace.

Iraq is far from lost, but in fact, despite the negative coverage, has a viable elected government that slogs on through the worst assaults imaginable. The coalition government includes all voices in the country. And that explains why, at least so far, there really is not a classic civil war in which one faction, with clearly defined goals of governance, tries to assume power, backed by substantial military force and broad public support.

The present strategy of Iraqization is the correct one, both for ethical and practical reasons. If we don’t withdraw precipitously, there is a good chance that Iraqi forces, and government flexibility, will eventually pacify Baghdad and its environs — where almost all the violence in the country is confined. Along with the stabilization of Afghanistan, and positive democratic developments in Lebanon, the Middle East is in flux, but with at least a chance of broad-based reform not seen in a half century.

Withdrawals from Lebanon and Gaza, while strategically and politically understandable, brought little commensurate peace to Israel. And while negotiations about borders are vital to a lasting peace between Israel and the Palestinians, a large number of the latter group believe that Israel itself can be unraveled through a mixture of terrorism, rocketry, and on-again-off-again diplomacy. Their real grievance against Israel is not so much its post-1967 retention of conquered land — there were 20 years of war prior to then — but its Westernized presence and daily example of success in a sea of failure. The pathologies of the Middle East were there prior to Israel, and will probably be enhanced rather than ameliorated by a sense of Israeli appeasement and American-induced concessions.

Finally, we are still one lax day away from another September 11, and will continue to be so until the currency and appeal of radical Islamism are history. Anti-Americanism can be crystallized by George Bush and his policies, but it was a pre-existing pathology that will survive long after he is gone — inasmuch as it is a symptom of a much larger malady: envy by the weaker of the world’s only hyperpower; ubiquity of intrusive globalized and destabilizing American popular culture; and the assurance that America, unlike a Russia or China, is sensitive to its critics and, indeed, often offers them the most sophisticated condemnations of its own values and traditions.

How to Judge?
Again, while there are variances, these are the general antitheses about our present war. The current majority view is slowing gaining ascendancy in policy-making circles. It reflects a general weariness on the part of the American people, who are daily bombarded with stories of anti-Americanism abroad, IED explosions in Iraq, and more mayhem on the West Bank. All that gloom and doom contributes to this feeling that we have already done enough, if not too much, and can, with more or less relative security, return to the status of the pre-September 11 world.

Like all wartime debates, the final arbiter will be the battlefield. If realist diplomacy, an end to the Bush Doctrine, withdrawal from Iraq, renewed pressure on Israel, and a rescinding of security measures can avoid another 9/11, prevent Middle East nuclear proliferation, deflate radical Islam’s appeal, and corral hostile regimes from gaining regional ascendancy, then the majority view may prove correct.

But if, on the other hand…well, you know the answer, and my own views on the matter.

Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. He is the author, most recently, of A War Like No Other. How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War.

TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; hanson; iraq; islam; lebanon; vdh; victordavishanson; wakeup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: neverdem

We're dealing with human filth that exults in murdering defenseless civilians: the kind of thinking Winston attributed to "purblind worldlings" is as crazy and stupid now as it was then...

21 posted on 12/01/2006 10:32:49 PM PST by 185JHP ( "The thing thou purposest shall come to pass: And over all thy ways the light shall shine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Bump for the morning

22 posted on 12/01/2006 10:34:59 PM PST by Valin (Rick Santorum 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Iraq is far from lost, but in fact, despite the negative coverage, has a viable elected government that slogs on through the worst assaults imaginable.

Worth repeating.

23 posted on 12/02/2006 9:58:02 AM PST by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("The fighting, the anger, the drama is tedious." Lindsay Lohan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
At least we have a chance. Americans at least have a spine...well half of us do. And we're still reproducing at sustainment levels, so our working population will continue to increase. Even better, those same demographics that are destroying Europe will benefit us, because guess who's not reproducing as much in this country? Liberals! Homosexuals can't reproduce. Feminazis won't reproduce. All those self-absorbed young liberals can't be bothered to reproduce.

Hate to sound a bit pessimistic, but allow me to share some problems with US demographics data:

Liberals (most groups) may not be reproducing as much, but they are importing far more of new ones (predominately Hispanics/Latinos), and indocrinating or seducing huge number of young ones (through PC, environmentalism, homosexuality, income redistribution, phoney medical research, liberal "religious" groups/sects, judicial activism etc.)

I am not saying it's a losing battle, but battle it is and many good-hearted and well-intentioned conservatives are either not realizing it or choose to stay away from it, ceding the battlefield and thus assuring their own defeat. "Silent majority" will become "silent minority" if it chooses to remain silent.

24 posted on 12/02/2006 10:04:38 AM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

ping for later

25 posted on 12/02/2006 7:23:18 PM PST by Greystoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets; jan in Colorado; M. Espinola; American in Israel; Convert from ECUSA; ...
"I view all Islam has the problem, not just radical Islamism. Does that make me a part of the minority Minority Opinion, or a part of the majority Minority Opinion?"

I was thinking about you all day.

Of course, Hanson is a secular thinker speaking in behalf of a wider "Conservative" community, and not Christianity per se.

You? Me? I was reading this the other morning:

1Jo 2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

1Jo 2:22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.

1Jo 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

Which brought to mind what is stated in the Qu'ran and Islamic belief:

Mosque with halfmoon in horizon"They say: Allah has taken a Son (to Himself)! Glory be to Him: he is the Self-sufficient: his is what is in the heavens and what is in the Earth; you have no authority for this; do you say against Allah what you do not know? Say: Those who forge a lie against Allah shall not be successful." - Koran 10:68-69

"....the Christians call 'Christ the Son Of God'. That is a saying from their mouth; (In this) they but intimate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth." - Koran 9: 30 [Ref.]

Thus, we get down to the very foundations of truth, something our "secular Post-modernist" society modeling morally relativism is adrift of. We can safely say that Islam (because we have all studied it extensively) is a antichrist belief system directly opposed to Christianity. Jesus Christ stated simply, '...I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." Joh 14:6. We can safely say that Mohammad is an attempted usurper of Christ's throne.

Therefore, as one man stated it, "Culture is religion externalized, and made specific," the clash of civilizations we see today between the "Christian" West and the Islamic world is rooted in the very conflict we see in the texts of the Bible and the Qu'ran, spiritual, and uncompromising—interfaith dialogues notwithstanding. Rick Warren and others are off the reservation if they think anything but challenging the error of Islam will work.

Resolution? ArmedArchConservative stated it pretty succinctly here. "The natural result of a thorough review of Judaism, Christianity, who share the same G_d, should be - the summary conversion of every open-minded, heartfelt scholarly inquirer from muhammadanism's madness to the eminent sanity, mercy, love, and justice of either becoming Jewish, or Christian."

Islam cannot be reformed, as it is not truth. Truth and error cannot live, naturally, in peace, especially with Islam's aggressive nature that appeals to the basest aspects of the unregenerate nature of man. These people need to come into the true light of the Gospel and be saved. Ultimately, they are in His hands.

Which brings us to the Internet. For example, my site continues to see a monthly increase in traffic, more and more from Middle Eastern countries. Our church's website, from talking to one of the tech guys months ago, continues to see a huge monthly increase as well. Huge.

With the new language tools such as GOOGLE, me, all of us, have a potentially transnational audience (so watch how you post), more so with Free Republic's high profile posture on the Internet (a lot of people from overseas post here) and in the Conservative world.

The Internet certainly is the new American/Roman Road.

In conclusion, this certainly does put all of us in a minority, but a minority that has access to some very effective and far reaching tools with formidable potential, the least being the basics of prayer for America and combat faith in the face of the gathering storm.

It's a great honor to serve with all of you in this great campaign of our times.

26 posted on 12/02/2006 7:37:49 PM PST by Salem (FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Salem
You'll have to forgive me for addressing the statement VDH made. It seemed to me to be a step backward into safer confines. In another article a week or two past, he did not differentiate radical Muslims, nor radical Islamism, but wrote to the woes of Islamism as a whole. It's a difficult stance to take in our politically correct times. It is a stance we will all have an opportunity to take.

Attempts to separate radical Muslims from Islam itself would be like trying to separate good weeds from bad among the vegetable garden where all weeds are bad.

It is an honor to serve with you also. I will never be the greatest of among our warriors, but I give my word to give my best.
27 posted on 12/02/2006 8:26:33 PM PST by backtothestreets (Invite Jesus to pray with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]


28 posted on 12/03/2006 1:53:55 PM PST by SJackson (A vote is like a rifle: its usefulness depends upon the character of the user, T. Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Lando Lincoln; quidnunc; .cnI redruM; SJackson; dennisw; monkeyshine; Alouette; ...

    Victor Davis Hanson Ping ! 

       Let me know if you want in or out.

Links:    FR Index of his articles: 
            His website:    
                NRO archive:

New Link!

29 posted on 12/03/2006 5:50:41 PM PST by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"It was not the Patriot Act that banned operas, condemned cartoons, allowed films to be ostracized, or muzzled teachers..."


30 posted on 12/03/2006 6:00:02 PM PST by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Thanks for posting the President's words. I was very soothed by reading them earlier this week. Tonight, at a dinner with other conservatives, the 'conventional wisdom' that President Bush is not a good communicator was cited. I wish I had been able to use these words as an example of his ability to say what he means - and of the media hiding his words from the public!

31 posted on 12/03/2006 6:39:59 PM PST by maica (America will be a hyperpower that's all hype and no power -- if we do not prevail in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
This is so discouraging, that a brilliant man such as VDH insists on getting it wrong, and describing the circumstances so narrowly, so cloudlike. He says:

Like fascism or Communism, Islamism galvanizes millions with its reductionist claims of Western liberal culpability for widely diverse Muslim gripes from Afghanistan to the West Bank.

There is NO such thing as "Islamism," or "Islamo-fascism". These are weasal words used by well-intentioned folks who for whatever reason refuse to call things by their proper names.

It is islam itself and the consequent worship of mohammed (the Perfect Man, an associate of allah) which is our enemy. Yes, it is an idea such as communism and fascism, but it is called islam.

The fact that a brilliant man such as VDH refuses to speak the truth, for whatever reason, tells me that we are destined for defeat.

"Stay the course" or any such formulation is absurd (and VDH is recommending stay the course, in effect).

Four things need to happen in our War on Jihad.

First, Americans, westerners, and moslems themselves need to be subjected to relentless propaganda of every variety, from the most primitive to the most sophisticated, to educate about the true nature of islamic jihad. It must be global and it must be daily.

Second, moslems must be restricted from western nations and dispelled where possible, but where they cannot be dispelled, their primitive and barbaric practices (such as honor killings, misogyny, the veil and all forms of sharia law) must be repressed.

Third, small, mobile, highly sophisticated and dedicated military units must travel the world engaging and destroying jihadis. We must be quite open about this. We must tell the world, if you harbor jihadis and do nothing about it, we will do it for you. We must tell the world, you will not even know what has hit you, because we will not let you know. We will simply do it.

Fourth, the American government must make a massive program to secure our infrastructure and to alter our energy use.

32 posted on 12/03/2006 7:08:14 PM PST by Urbane_Guerilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maica

You are welcome. I found his statements to be a relief too.

I watched the video of the entire press conference and he was VERY articulate and it was totally extemporaneous. That presser ran 38 minutes.

Call up the other dinner guests and have them watch it. It's archived on C-SPAN (maybe WH site too). Otherwise, of course, they would NEVER see it on lame brain traitor media.

33 posted on 12/03/2006 7:19:14 PM PST by La Enchiladita (People get ready . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Good idea! I will email them the link to the speech on cspan, and maybe the link to the Whitehouse,gov website.

34 posted on 12/03/2006 7:33:28 PM PST by maica (America will be a hyperpower that's all hype and no power -- if we do not prevail in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

Required reading. Thanks.

35 posted on 12/03/2006 8:10:14 PM PST by AmericaUnite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The current majority view is slowing gaining ascendancy in policy-making circles.

What time is it, boys and girls?

That's right! It's holiday from history time again!

36 posted on 12/03/2006 9:01:02 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChad
That's right! It's holiday from history time again!

For its part, most of the West has wanted to take a holiday from history and the reality of Islam since 1492. Since then it has used the oceans to avoid the reality of Islam until the relatively recent discovery of oil there. Now after having enriched the area with petrodollars and technology, a resurgent Islam has come back to haunt us.

37 posted on 12/03/2006 9:25:37 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
There are, to be sure, different reasons why each has so inflamed the violent resentment of militant Islam but I do find it revealing that at least part of that resentment stems from the envy of the successful by the unsuccessful who have comforted themselves with the illusion that success is theft, (and conversely, that theft is success). That classic criticism of Western culture is shared by communists and anti-colonialists, who are the company in which the Islamists march. Chavez and Mugabe understand it perfectly well; so did Trotsky and bin Laden.

For these, Iraq cannot be allowed to succeed. For it to do so would be an affirmation of an activist American foreign policy that is anathema to leftists everywhere, including Congress. For Iraq to succeed would a rejection of militant Islam as the only route to a better life. For Iraq to prosper would be a terrible threat to the autocrats who populate the Middle East. These compose a dark alliance of those who either would tear Iraq apart or condone it, each for his or her own selfish reasons. Not a one of them, including those of them who are Iraqi, has the welfare of the Iraqi people foremost in mind.

This is very well stated. The anti-Western zealots--in the Middle East, in Europe, even here in America--do indeed resent any successful countries. Success must come at the expense of someone else; ergo, it is illegitimate. The best that can be hoped for is some sort of "ism"--whether the backward-looking Islamism that will subdue the Infidel, thereby bringing joy and triumphalism to the Muslim masses; or the (supposedly) forward-looking Marxism, with its promises of a delightful egalitarianism.

Your comments almost always impress me as well-considered and trenchant. Certainly, these were no exception.

38 posted on 12/03/2006 11:52:35 PM PST by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Put me down as one who believes the minority brief.

39 posted on 12/04/2006 4:54:52 AM PST by James Ewell Brown Stuart (If you want to have a good time, jine the cavalry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Fortunately, President Bush is on our side, and he will always be. He is the only CIC and he is the only one who makes the real decisions on foreign policy.

Yep that is the problem with the DC Political Media complex. They fail to grasp the President is NOT some sort of Congressional Clerk but a co equal branch of the US Govt. The Surrender Now crowd in the US Congress does not have the votes to either impeach nor over ride the President. They still do NOT seem to grasp Bush, not they are in charge, of Iraq policy.

The squealing from the Junk Media when they finally realize they still do control policy should be amusing to hear

40 posted on 12/04/2006 5:04:05 AM PST by MNJohnnie (I do not forgive Senator John McCain for helping destroy everything we built since 1980.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson