Posted on 12/09/2006 3:35:26 AM PST by anglian
What a p*ssy.
When Fallujah was a terrorist haven.... ....that's all the media wrote about. Now that Fallujah is stable and productive, the media is silent.
Mega bump!
I attended a city council meeting, where a democratically elected mayor and city council led the deliberations about the peoples business. To be honest, the Councils discussion of traffic control was not exciting. But the mundane business of a functioning democracy can be uneventful when its institutions are working properly. At the same time, it was exciting to witness democracy in action on soil that once seemed entirely inhospitable. Membership of the Fallujah Business Association has grown from only 20 members last February to over 350 today, demonstrating optimism for economic growth. I even saw a processing center where Fallujah welcomes persons displaced by instability elsewhere.
http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/FrontPage%20Stories/Commentary%20Fallujah%20Revisited.aspx
Hattip to http://www.antimedia.us/
Can anyone say "RINO?"
Smith was fairly conservative before he got to Washington. It seems like being in the Senate has an emasculating effect.
Is Fallajah "stable and productive"?
Liar.
It applies to the Bush haters too.
That bought Bush a lot of goodwill from Gordon, didn't it?
Thanks for that. I never knew that...since the MSM hasn't mentioned it.
In fairness, I haven't seen that posted anyplace in here either.
Why is that? Because I refuse to drink the koolade?
I'm not going to get bent out of shape because you called me a liar, wolfie.
We've agreed with each other more often than not over the years in here.
Go. And sin no more!
...it's George Bush's fault, and he is the one who needs to summon the courage and competence to make this right. Otherwise, he is going to be ranked right down there with Lyndon Johnson as a failed president who led a failed war.
You may not be intending to lie to others, but you are certainly lying to yourself. Why? It may be correct to say you partially support him, but fully? Your own posts indicate otherwise. BTW, I'm one of the rare pragmatists around FR who does not expect to agree "fully" with any other human being, and certainly not with politicians.
Also BTW, the reference to "drinking koolaid" is such an over-used cliche. It's intended only to pidgeon-hole "the other" as not being as smart as the poster who uses it. As for me, I caught NetLiberty's use of "summon the courage," and immediately rejected the rest of his/her argument. Agree or disagree with him on any policy -- and whatever else one can say about him -- President Bush is, without question, one of the most courageous Presidents in our history.
...it's George Bush's fault, and he is the one who needs to summon the courage and competence to make this right. Otherwise, he is going to be ranked right down there with Lyndon Johnson as a failed president who led a failed war.
You may not be intending to lie to others, but you are certainly lying to yourself. Why? It may be correct to say you partially support him, but fully? Your own posts indicate otherwise. BTW, I'm one of the rare pragmatists around FR who does not expect to agree "fully" with any other human being, and certainly not with politicians.
Also BTW, the reference to "drinking koolaid" is such an over-used cliche. It's intended only to pidgeon-hole "the other" as not being as smart as the poster who uses it. As for me, I caught NetLiberty's use of "summon the courage," and immediately rejected the rest of his/her argument. Agree or disagree with him on any policy -- and whatever else one can say about him -- President Bush is, without question, one of the most courageous Presidents in our history.
I think President Bush belongs on Rushmore.
I was agreeing with the 2nd sentence beginning with "Otherwise....."
I completely glossed over the words suggesting President Bush lacks courage or competence.
And if you took the trouble to view my posts in the forum, I'm sure you'll see I am in no way a Bush or GOP basher.
Cheers!
I don't see an alternative to more troops fighting more ferociously.The problem is that this isn't an alternative either. General Abizaid said that he couldn't get even 20,000 additional troops for more than a short time.
Yeah, I'll bet you do, "Senator." Corssroads my a&&.
Excellent point, Steel Wolf.Well there's not much we can do about them but whine now can we? Let's work on what we can fix, our side.
It applies to the Bush haters too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.