Skip to comments.Joel McNally: Affirmative action foes really want whites-first (BARF alert)
Posted on 12/30/2006 6:31:11 AM PST by rellimpank
click here to read article
Joel is mentally ill.
This is one of the most offensive articles I have ever read.
To Joel McNally: You are a racist bigot. Please go rot in hell.
Quite sincerely, 'Pod.
This was the same stuff that was said when he came to Michigan to start the referendum process. The Michigan liberal media announced it as the effective end of the world.
It was a long fight and it's not over yet, but the people won. No more societal sanctioned racism will be allowed in Michigan.
Go for it Wisconsin!
Its a nicely laid out article, which when taken as a whole admits that blacks cannot compete intellectually on an equal basis with whites, and in order to place blacks into colleges and jobs where tests are given,blacks must be given preferences.
We already knew that. Nothing has changed in the 30 or 40 years that blacks have been given these preferences, they are no more nearer to being able to compete on an equal footing today than they were 40 years ago.
Of course ,according to this writer I am sure that is also the fault of the evil White man.
ROFL. This old chestnut is the cheapest way for this racist to open his rant. How pathetic.
Let's see.. Clinton is the "first black" president (=liberals muddying the race issue), and now Ward is the "KKK"? (=liberals muddying the race issue); but liberals demand quotas based STRICTLY on "skin color".
Liberals lost the debate during the Clinton years. And like Saddam saying to the very end: "Iraq is nothing without me"... the liberals cling to the same refrain regarding race.
--I keep track of this dimwit as a horrible example of what passes for thought on the political left---
"Have you ever noticed that people who don't seem too bright themselves have an almost magical belief in tests?"
No, idiot, I have found the EXACT OPPOSITE to be true.
This was a disturbing look into the mind of a liberal. It is scary and disgusting.
The gist of this article is as follows:
"Blacks are dumb and whites who don't recognize that aren't being honest. Whites don't care about the plight of the dumb darkie and just want jobs for themselves. That's why they oppose affirmitive action. Enlightened people recognize how mean this is. Oh, yeah, Bush is dumb and wasn't really elected."
That's what I got from this pile of excrement.
From article: Inviting Ward Connerly to speak to a special Wisconsin legislative committee studying affirmative action is like inviting the grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan to address a hearing on race relations
Which would give the most fair address on a hearing of race relations.
1. The Ku Klux Klan or
2. The Congressional Black Caucus
or this choice
and be prepared to explain what the difference would be other than the race of the addressee.
Neither of the choices supports the full tenor of the Constitution.
Duke and Farrakhan, KKK and CBlack Caucaus all demand quotas and special rights. As in "mola". 40-acres and a mule. A nation divided. Each of these individuals and groups are racialists.
I see clearly what your point is. They exist to keep alive -- RACISM. That's the motive of their existence.
I read it as him saying that blacks really are dumber than whites and that's just the way it is and will always be.
Sounded like a bad point to me.
Its the fault of blacks that they are underrepresented in Madison. I'm I right or am I wrong?
Sounds like a complete fabrication.
I believe he opposes "affirmative action" for ANYONE!
Curiously, I've heard no cries for AA in the NBA or NFL; the best qualified get the jobs and the others either get good enough or don't work in the industry. Why is that unfair in any other business? < /rhetoric >
No doubt that the left is crazy.
Obviously, sgtbono2002's point went zooming over your race-focused cranial matter.
From what Sgtbono posted, he clipped first from the racist article author; then posited an interesting question. I did not pick up that Sgtbono was AGREEING with the article. Correct me, pls, if you think I'm wrong on this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.