Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Hillary Clinton win in 2008?
BBC NEWS ^ | Saturday, January 20, 2007 | Richard Allen Greene

Posted on 01/20/2007 9:18:45 PM PST by MinorityRepublican

Hillary Clinton has finally announced that she is considering running for president in 2008 - a declaration anticipated for the past six years that puts a heavyweight contender into the race.

Senator Clinton has already made history by becoming the first former First Lady to be elected to public office.

But all thoughts will now turn to whether the New York Democrat really has what it takes to become the first woman president of the United States.

It would be foolish to dismiss a woman who sits on an enormous war chest and is backed by some of the best political strategists in the country.

But it would be equally unwise to bet that the US will elect a woman president when the country is at war - much less one who is already reviled by a substantial minority of Americans for her perceived liberalism and association with Bill Clinton.

Warning to Republicans

Mark Corallo, a Republican strategist, reckons she has a good chance of capturing the White House in 2008 - and says he is constantly warning friends against underestimating her.

"Every time a Republican tells me: 'We want [to run against] Hillary', I say: 'Be careful what you wish for'.

"There is no other candidate on either side of the equation that has the instant party organisation and the ability to raise an enormous amount of money.

"She has the two most formidable strategists in the Democratic Party - Terry McAuliffe and Harold Ickes," Mr Corallo says before correcting himself: "No, three, because Bill Clinton is the most formidable. The guy is brilliant."

Mr Corallo, co-owner of the consultancy Corallo Comstock, says only one Democrat could take the party's nomination away from Senator Clinton: Barack Obama, the first-term senator from Illinois.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; clinton; hillary; hillaryclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: poinq

A Hispanic and a woman? Sorry but that doesn't go together.


41 posted on 01/21/2007 1:18:36 AM PST by MinorityRepublican (Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

She can win if the Republicans don't get their head out of their butt!


42 posted on 01/21/2007 1:35:33 AM PST by meyer (Bring back the Contract with America and you'll bring back the Republican majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carola

Good point about Kerry.

I think she can win too. The only hope I have is that she can't really stand the heat. She still has never had to face tough questions anywhere.

But, I am trying to brace myself in case the wrost happens.


43 posted on 01/21/2007 1:39:03 AM PST by BunnySlippers (SAY YES TO RUDY !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

She won't win because I believe the entire country has Bush/Clinton fatigue - those two families have dominated US politics for the past 20 years. It's time for new leadership.


44 posted on 01/21/2007 3:34:14 AM PST by Dr Thompson (No)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Can Hillary Clinton win in 2008?

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

- Edmund Burke

45 posted on 01/21/2007 3:39:43 AM PST by wai-ming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
She will never get our vote

She can count on the loons in the GENERAL election

So it comes down to the Independent/3rd party voters

Will they vote for her? .. Will they stay home? ... Or will they split the vote and go 3rd party?

Think of the 1992 and 1996 Election and she can very will win in 2008

DO NOT under estimate this witch
46 posted on 01/21/2007 3:51:15 AM PST by Mo1 (Mrs. Bill Clinton - "We're going to take what you have and give it to others for the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carola

'Loathesome Kerry' issued a statement to the effect that he has no timetable for his presidential announcement plans. He's waiting for Obama to implode and Hill's negatives to sink her once and for all. Will never forget C-Span one night last January. Kerry groveling to NH dem party faithful. Short speech, not many in the audience. Lackluster applause, if any. The second he shut up, the room emptied as if someone had yelled FIRE! He roamed around trying to shake hands, but was able to trap very few who were desperately running for the door. All caught on camera. C-Span replayed it at two AM, and I got up to watch it again. Hilarious.


47 posted on 01/21/2007 3:54:56 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Provided she wins her dreadful party's nomination, of course she can win the presidential election and IMO it'll take star power to defeat her.

Perusing over at the DUmmies, there are a LOT of people who don't like her. Her detractors consider her in the pockets of corporate America, a big sin if you want to hold the Rat banner. The question is, if she gets the nomination, will more of her party's voters swallow hard and vote for her anyway, than will have to do the same over on our side? We don't have anybody yet who most people can accept, let alone get excited by.

Obama does have star power, even if it is only the sort of meaningless media adulation that they shower on naughty celebrities. I'm hoping that he becomes the anti-Hillary, the rest fade away quickly, and she defeats him only after getting very nasty and dirty. With the eventual Republican nominee most likely being someone that the majority of the conservatives are not going to like, we need far more pissed off Rat voters willing to go third party in November, 2008, than will stay home and not vote for a McCain or Giuliani.

48 posted on 01/21/2007 3:59:53 AM PST by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

absolutely

the last 2 elections were in small % differences

there will be enough of novelty act votes that will push the thing over

and whomever dangles free stuff wins

free healtcare
free mommy care
free oil
free everything


49 posted on 01/21/2007 4:45:00 AM PST by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

She can win if conservatives get focused on some candidate that can't win, and then stay home on election day when he or she isn't chosen as the Republican nominee. I confess I helped put the Clintons into power in 1992 by voting for Perot as a protest candidate, and will not make that mistake ever again.


50 posted on 01/21/2007 5:03:21 AM PST by Moonmad27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Please, Lord, NO!


51 posted on 01/21/2007 5:05:27 AM PST by mombonn (God is looking for spiritual fruit, not religious nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

She is going to win.

Due to the fact that no one in the republican party has bigger balls than she does. No one...


52 posted on 01/21/2007 5:07:48 AM PST by sit-rep ( http://trulineint.com/latestposts.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Yes.

Repubs are weak, plus Osama/Hitlary will automatically get the NE, steal several States in the upper/lower mid-west, and automatically get Cali. plus other west coast States.

Dems are getting pretty close to overcoming the South.

Of course voters are to blame since everyone wants the government to wipe their butts for them. Sadly limited government is dead which is why Osama/Hitlary could win.
53 posted on 01/21/2007 5:21:33 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Yes she can and likely will win.

Because the GOP does not have a candidate that can beat her. The RINO's won't get the conservative vote and the conservatives don't have anyone with star power (or for that matter name recognition).

The good news is that with a Clinton presidency and a liberal Congress this country will go down the tubes over her first term. That gives an opoortunity for a true conservative to position himself as someone ready to make the tough choices neccessary to restore the Republic.


54 posted on 01/21/2007 5:22:50 AM PST by tfelice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

"heavyweight contender" I wouldn't call her fat.


55 posted on 01/21/2007 5:22:56 AM PST by exnavy (God means love, not hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rollo tomasi
If limited government is dead the only ones to blame are the GOP who has held power for 12 years. The Dems surely were never for it - the GOP only talked liked they were for it, but governed like little socialists.

Limited government is alive and well in the hearts and minds of Americans. It will take a true leader to bring it back to the forefront. And I believe that leader will not come from the GOP, but from the outside. The GOP frankly has lost all credibility regarding limited government.
56 posted on 01/21/2007 5:26:44 AM PST by tfelice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: tfelice
The good news is that with a Clinton presidency and a liberal Congress this country will go down the tubes over her first term.

The same was said of Clinton 42.

57 posted on 01/21/2007 5:34:55 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: tfelice

Limited govenrnment was wounded in 1913/Wilson's Presidency and FDR's reign was the killing blow.

LBJ/Nixon poked sticks in it to make sure it was dead.

We need to start over which is impossible right now.


58 posted on 01/21/2007 5:36:33 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
The same was said of Clinton 42

Right. And the GOP won control of Congress for the first time in 40 years under Clinton's watch. It's a shame that the GOP blew it though.
59 posted on 01/21/2007 5:38:08 AM PST by tfelice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: All

YOU ALL IGNORE SIMPLE MATH

First, we know the balance between the two parties is fairly even.

The sad truth is that a Hillary/Obama or Hillary/Richardson ticket will bring out millions of previous non-voters based only on their gender/race. That is enough to tip the balance. Period.

Hillary's VP selection will be based on the Republican candidate. If someone like Tancredo is the nominee, Hillary will pick Richardson. Anyone soft on immigration and Hillary will pick Obama.


60 posted on 01/21/2007 5:39:20 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson