Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1970: Heathrow welcomes first 'jumbo jet' (Link to Video)
BBC ^ | 22 January, 2007 | Staff

Posted on 01/22/2007 4:26:40 PM PST by Paleo Conservative

1970: Heathrow welcomes first 'jumbo jet' The first jumbo jet carrying fare-paying passengers has arrived at Heathrow airport.

The newly-constructed Boeing 747, Pan Am Flight Two, touched down at Heathrow at 1414GMT today - seven hours late due to technical problems.

The jumbo had brought 324 passengers across the Atlantic from New York to London.

But the return journey to New York did not run so smoothly. Thirty-six of the 153 passengers transferred to other flights after a faulty compressed air bottle, used to blow open the plane's door in an emergency, meant take-off was delayed for four-and-a-half hours at Heathrow.

Safety concerns

This was not the first problem experienced by the 350-ton aircraft during the run-up to its launch into commercial service.

In October 1969 it was revealed there were developmental problems with the Pratt and Whitney JT 9D engines used to power the aircraft, and there were fears the project would be scrapped.

However, Pan Am was confident the problem could be overcome and the jumbo was safe, so production continued.

The previous year there had been concerns about the safety of passengers in an emergency and the logistics of evacuating large numbers of people from the aircraft in a short space of time.

As a result every jumbo jet was fitted with four inflatable chutes down which 80 passengers a minute could slide in an emergency.

But in spite of these problems it is thought the 360-seat 747, now the largest aeroplane on the market, will herald the dawn of a new era in long-distance air travel for a huge number of travellers.

With operating costs dramatically reduced and larger passenger capacity, more people will be able to afford to travel further afield. Travel experts predict that long-distance package holidays will now become more popular.

Pan Am is the first airline to fly the newly-constructed jumbo jet on a commercial basis, having purchased 25 aircraft at a cost of £187m last year.

The British Overseas Airways Corporation (Boac) have placed an order for 11 jumbos but a current pay dispute by the British Air Line Pilots Association (Balpa) is delaying its introduction into service in the UK.

Heathrow has undergone an £11m refurbishment to accommodate the new aeroplanes and the huge influx of passengers that is expected.

In Context

Within six months of its launch the Boeing 747 Jumbo Jet had carried a million passengers.

A year after its launch nearly 100 jumbo jets were being operated by 17 airlines and the number of passengers had increased to seven million.

The safety record of the Boeing 747 has been good and although it has been involved in several accidents none has been directly attributable to a fault with the aircraft.

The Boeing 747 has dominated the airline world for the past 30 years and has remained the largest passenger aircraft in existence.

However, it was beaten in size by the Airbus A380 which seats between 555 and 840 passengers and went into production in May 2004 in Toulouse, France.

It made its UK debut on 18 May 2006 when it landed at Heathrow from Berlin.



TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: 747; aerospace; boeing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Boeing is close selling its 1,500th 747.
1 posted on 01/22/2007 4:26:41 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; namsman; ...

Pan American Airlines are the first
company to fly the Jumbo 747
commercially

If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail.


2 posted on 01/22/2007 4:28:36 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

The technical problems with the first 747 sound like the current issues with the A-380.


3 posted on 01/22/2007 4:30:27 PM PST by trumandogz (Rudy G 2008: The "G" Stands For Gun Grabbing & Gay Lovin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

American engineering at its finest!


4 posted on 01/22/2007 4:30:56 PM PST by Aikonaa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
The technical problems with the first 747 sound like the current issues with the A-380.

The main problem with the 747 was the engines. The first commercial flights were delayed a couple of months. The A380 is being delayed by over two years so far, but the engines aren't the problem, the airplane itself is. Boeing delivered over 100 747's in the first two years including 63 the first year. Airbus will have the A380 in very limited production till 2009.

5 posted on 01/22/2007 4:35:50 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Before the 747 went into service, the P&W engines was the big hold up of the project.
Boeing just kept on producing the 747, and parked them in the lot, and hung huge concrete blocks from the pylons to prevent the plane from coming up and rest on the rear of the plane.
6 posted on 01/22/2007 4:36:39 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
Boeing just kept on producing the 747, and parked them in the lot, and hung huge concrete blocks from the pylons to prevent the plane from coming up and rest on the rear of the plane.

Does anyone have some pictures of that?

7 posted on 01/22/2007 4:38:04 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Didn't they start to work on the 747-200 a few months after the first 747-100s went into service ?
What was the main difference between the 100s and the 200s ? a more beefy landing gear, and stronger engines, and more windows in the upper deck ?
8 posted on 01/22/2007 4:40:10 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I have to find some.


9 posted on 01/22/2007 4:40:58 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

They still build 'em that way - take a tour of the Boeing plant (Seattle) and you'll see the blocks holding down the wings until the engines are installed.


10 posted on 01/22/2007 4:42:08 PM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
They still build 'em that way - take a tour of the Boeing plant (Seattle) and you'll see the blocks holding down the wings until the engines are installed.

That was started more recently as a way of decreasing the interest cost of building them. The engines used to be installed earlier.

11 posted on 01/22/2007 4:44:17 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Thanks, didn't know that part.

More "just-in-time" techniques, I guess.


12 posted on 01/22/2007 4:53:09 PM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
More "just-in-time" techniques, I guess.

When you consider how expensive the components are, reducing interest charges is not insignificant. The interest on one $10,000,000 engine per month at 8% interest is $66,666.67. So installing all four engines on a 747 before they are needed would cost over a quarter million dollars a month just for interest payments.

13 posted on 01/22/2007 4:59:45 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

14 posted on 01/22/2007 4:59:58 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
What's the difference between Boeing jets and Airbus jets?

Boeing jets break ground and fly into the wind.

HF

P.S. When Boeing jets land they touch down. When Airbus jets land, they arrive!

15 posted on 01/22/2007 5:20:11 PM PST by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
And for those who don't know, the 747 that flew that first trans-Atlantic flight (Clipper Victor, N736PA) was later lost on March 27, 1977 in the accident at Tenerife.
16 posted on 01/22/2007 5:24:12 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Bush Derangement Syndrome Has Reached Pandemic Levels on Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holden
Boeing jets break ground and fly into the wind.

Does that mean tha Airbus jets break wind and fly into the ground??

17 posted on 01/22/2007 6:19:38 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

11 & 1/2 hours of delay on 12 hours worth of flight doesn't sound like an accomplishment of which to be proud.


18 posted on 01/22/2007 7:01:18 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
That's the joke, yup.

HF

19 posted on 01/22/2007 7:05:56 PM PST by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I flew on that first return flight from Heathrow to NY- what a hoot!


20 posted on 01/22/2007 7:31:02 PM PST by fat city (What part of cognitive dissonance don't you understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson