Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elderly Man Dies In Gunfire Exchange With Undercover Officers
News4Jax.com ^ | January 28th, 2007 | Staff

Posted on 01/30/2007 1:12:56 PM PST by FreedomCalls

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- An elderly man is dead and two Jacksonville Sheriff's Office detectives are on administrative leave after an undercover narcotics investigation ended in gunfire late Saturday.

According to the JSO, detectives Donald Maynard and James Narcisse had been working undercover for about three hours in the 2300 block of Westmont Street when 80-year-old Isaac Singletary approached them with a gun just before 6 p.m.

The officers said they ordered the man to put down the gun. However, Singletary did not drop his weapon and gunshots were exchanged.

Singletary was shot several times. Paramedics rushed him to Shands-Jacksonville Medical Center, where he died.

Less than 24 hours after the fatal police shooting left his uncle dead, Gary Evans told Channel 4 he's mad.

"Eighty-years-old, and they had to shoot him twice or more in order to subdue him. I'm very upset about it," Evans said.

He said his uncle was territorial and mad about the drugs on his street, and would often take his gun and try to scare the drug dealers away.

On Saturday, things went terribly wrong.

"My uncle asked the officer, which he didn't know at the time he was a police officer, to leave his property and he didn't," Evans said.

Neighbors told Channel 4 that Singletary was very protective of his property.

"You don't expect somebody to come pointing a gun at you, and once they do that, the officers will tell them to drop the gun," JSO Chief Dwain Senterfitt said. "We're still investigating what statements were made, but obviously, at that point, the officers' lives were in danger."

Police said they are still trying to figure out if the undercover officers had time to tell Singletary they were undercover officers. They said the detectives had to hid behind a tree to avoid being shot by Singletary.

According to police, the officers had been in the neighborhood since about 2:45 p.m., and had made five drug-related arrests.

"In the course of our undercover activity and making several arrests in this neighborhood, a man we now know to be a resident of that area, Mr. Isaac Singletary, was shot by officers," said Director of Investigations and Homeland Security Micheal Edwards.

Saturday's shooting was the third JSO-involved shooting in three weeks. Unlike last week's case at the Sable Palm Apartments, there is no dispute whether Singletary had a gun.

"There was a confrontation between them and an exchange of gunfire," Edwards said.

However, the question of who fired the first shot remains unanswered.

"He shot at my uncle first. He was the first one to shoot, and my uncle returned fire," Evans said.

"As you know, our investigation into any shooting must be thorough and methodical. At this time, there's a limited amount of information we can share," Edwards said.

As the details of the shooting are being hashed out, scared neighbors and sad family members remember Singletary.

"I looked in his eyes I saw his pain. I felt the pain for him. He never bothered anybody. He's never done anything to anybody. He didn't want anybody in his yard," said neighbor Antionette Douglas.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: addictedleroy; donutwatch; drugwar; guns; police; shooting; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last
To: FreedomCalls

Sad, but bad idea to point your gun at someone unless they are threatening you. Old west rules, you draw first, that is a threat that justifies return fire.


41 posted on 01/30/2007 2:33:17 PM PST by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

On a related note:

http://www.rense.com/general75/emp.htm


42 posted on 01/30/2007 2:34:27 PM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tinian

I think most marijuana is either grown inside the US or imported from Canada actually. I don't think Coca or Poppy grows very well in the Mexican climate. A wall needs to be built but to think it will stop drugs from entering the country is naive at best.


43 posted on 01/30/2007 2:34:46 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
>>"Another grandpa dead because of an undercover drug squad."

>"Oh goody. Another "I'm a 'libertarian' and thus don't need facts" thread.

What part of that sentence is factually wrong?

44 posted on 01/30/2007 2:36:19 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

If the police tell you to put down your gun, put it down!


45 posted on 01/30/2007 2:45:16 PM PST by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
I have no idea why they just didn't leave if he gave them the opportunity.

Live theatre. The show must go on.

46 posted on 01/30/2007 2:47:59 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
What part of that sentence is factually wrong?

You do not know why this man died, thus the entire sentence is prejudice masquerading as judgement. You're a "libertarian" aren't you?

47 posted on 01/30/2007 2:48:27 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lafroste
However, from the info in the article, they are culpable and should be held accountable.

There is not enough information. We don't know who fired first. We don't know what the resident said to the cops. I do not have specific knowledge of Florida laws but would you think the cops culpable if the resident fired first? Does a Florida homeowner have a legal right to shoot anyone in his yard who fails to leave when ordered to?

48 posted on 01/30/2007 2:56:19 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
"My uncle asked the officer, which he didn't know at the time he was a police officer, to leave his property and he didn't," Evans said.

Any grammar mavens out there care to try to diagram this gem? Me, I'm noodling out what figure of speech "which" is here.
49 posted on 01/30/2007 3:00:31 PM PST by Xenalyte (Anything is possible when you don't understand how anything happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Continental Soldier
If the police tell you to put down your gun, put it down!

Not when you are on your own property, and they aren't identifying themselves properly. Florida has the "castle doctrine."

50 posted on 01/30/2007 3:02:55 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: gvrlady; misterrob
AND IF IT WAS YOUR GRANDPA? Would you be saying that to yourself? NO NO I DON'T THINK SO!!!!!!

Settle down, unbunch your panties, and lay off the exclamation points.

I don't know if Misterrob would "be saying that" to himself, but I'm willing to bet he, like most FReepers, doesn't welcome other people assuming he'd say stupid crap.
51 posted on 01/30/2007 3:03:08 PM PST by Xenalyte (Anything is possible when you don't understand how anything happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JTHomes
Sad, but bad idea to point your gun at someone unless they are threatening you.

People dealing drugs in your yard is a threat to you.

52 posted on 01/30/2007 3:04:05 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
Does a Florida homeowner have a legal right to shoot anyone in his yard who fails to leave when ordered to?

Florida follows the "reasonable man" standard, so the answer is "yes" in the correct circumstances.

53 posted on 01/30/2007 3:05:19 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: AmericanHunter

Not good enough. If you have nothing to hide why not just surrender?


54 posted on 01/30/2007 3:07:04 PM PST by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
You do not know why this man died, thus the entire sentence is prejudice masquerading as judgement.

He didn't die of natural causes did he? He died from bullets shot from the undercover drug squad. The police admit that much. You can't put your head in the sand and deny facts in the hope that they will go away.

55 posted on 01/30/2007 3:07:36 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
Settle down, unbunch your panties, and lay off the exclamation points.

Sage advice < /snicker >

56 posted on 01/30/2007 3:08:02 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
You can't put your head in the sand and deny facts in the hope that they will go away.

We're talking about the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office here...you'd be amazed at what they get away with by putting their heads in the sand and denying facts.

57 posted on 01/30/2007 3:10:47 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Continental Soldier
If the police tell you to put down your gun, put it down!

Sure.. if someone in plain clothes asserts that they are police you better do exactly what they say.

You would be an easy mark.

58 posted on 01/30/2007 3:17:34 PM PST by Smogger (It's the WOT Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
Florida follows the "reasonable man" standard, so the answer is "yes" in the correct circumstances.

I asked whether the homeowner had the right to shoot anyone and your reply is that he would only have the right "in the correct circumstances". The article does not provide information sufficient to show whether the circumstances at hand would establish the homeowner's right to shoot in this case. Therefore you were wrong when you stated previously that the officers are shown by the known facts to be culpable.

59 posted on 01/30/2007 3:29:04 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
It is against the law to sell drugs, purchase drugs or possess drugs.

It is also against the law to trespass. If they were on his property they need to face manslaughter charges. One thing is for sure they should be finished as cops.

60 posted on 01/30/2007 3:31:55 PM PST by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson