Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Modern Standards Too High?
Hartford Courant ^ | 2/15/07 | Joann Klimikiewicz

Posted on 02/15/2007 10:19:33 AM PST by qam1

It can be argued, and without a hint of mockery, that the commitment crisis befalling the current marrying generation could come down to a question of deodorant.

And it's a big question.

Blinking at the vast rows of tubes in the pharmacy aisle, there are many considerations: Stick or aerosol? Regular or scented? Sea Breeze or Powder Fresh? Newfangled body spray or old-fashioned antiperspirant?

The options feel endless. And overwhelming.

The same can be said of the modern state of dating and mating and trying to marry, says Jillian Strauss, author of "Unhooked Generation: The Truth About Why We're Still Single."

"We live in a multiple-choice society, and our options are totally paralyzing us," Strauss says. "And because we have so many choices, we raise our expectations."

Experts believe those mounting expectations factor heavily in the nation's declining marriage rate. Today, Americans look to their partners to be everything: best friends and lovers, protectors and counselors. They want marriages anchored in romance yet practically organized around family and finances.

"One of the fundamental problems about marriage today is that we have a very high standard of what it should be," says David Popenoe, a co-director of the National Marriage Project at Rutgers University. "And that kind of marriage is actually unique in the history [of the institution]. In times past, a spouse was just someone who could help you get through life. It was a sexual and work partnership more than anything.

"But today, it's an emotional partnership. That's much harder to maintain."

And much harder to find, says Strauss. "We don't really need marriage for financial stability or status. We want it because we think it will make us happy," she says. "That's a [higher] bar to set. How can something make us happy all the time?"

Still, Strauss' generation digs through the masses of singles in search of it. As much as they've treasured their independence, as they brush against and into their 30s, they're wondering why they haven't been able to find that connection yet. And why it seemed so easy for their parents' generation.

The answer, says Strauss, is there's a lot stacked up against Generation X. Many values and ideals they were raised with go against the nature of marriage and the ingredients that make it work.

A successful marriage takes compromise, but her generation was raised to believe it is a dirty word. Marriage is about working as a team, but they were raised to think in terms of "I." Marriage is about consistency and companionship. Gen Xers crave change and value their independence.

And marriage requires tolerance. But Strauss says her peers stand at its threshold with a lofty checklist of unwavering standards. Singles today shop for mates like they do houses and cars. They log onto internet dating sights or Google potential partners, getting information that was never available to their parents' generation.

An opposing political affiliation, a misspelled word in an e-mail, a hobby that doesn't match their own - all these things gleaned at an instant, and all grounds to pull out of a relationship, or never plug in in the first place.

"We've started to commodify our partners. And we think we can have every single thing we want in a mate," says Strauss. If they disappoint, "we think there's an upgrade out there, just like a cellphone."

It comes back to a question of options. Whereas previous generations might have had 10 people to choose from at party, hers has hundreds to choose from on Match.com. They have to whittle them down somehow.

"You think, `I've waited this long. I'm not going to settle now. I'm going to wait for the right person'," says Strauss. "All the options seem to say the perfect person is out there."

Are We Asking Too Much?

Isn't this too much expectation put upon one person, upon one relationship? It might be, says Stephanie Coontz, author of "Marriage, A History: From Obedience to Intimacy, or How Love Conquered Marriage."

Yet, she's not an advocate of lowering expectations. "I have studied the 4,000 years of marriage where people did not expect any kind of fairness or fulfillment," says Coontz. "Some people might have managed to carve out a good marriage anyway, but it also meant a lot of people put up with some truly miserable marriages."

What she advocates is that people broaden expectations of relationships they have outside of romantic partnerships. No one person can meet every single need. The belief that they should, Coontz says, is a new one that's developed only in the last 30 years.

"More married people are cocooning with each other than ever before. And fewer married people say they have other friends and confidantes outside of marriage," says Coontz. "And that's probably a bad thing. Somehow we've gone from one extreme to the other."

From not expecting enough to expecting far too much.

But this does not have to spell gloom for modern-day courtship in America, says Strauss. "All these obstacles exist out there, seeming to conspire against our finding love. But it's all within ourselves to change it," she says.

Flip the paradigm, Strauss says. Embrace compromise, celebrate change. Come to terms with the fact that a committed relationship does not have to equate boredom, that swinging singledom is not always so swinging.

Take a risk - on mates, on their inevitable foibles, on easing some standards of that unwavering checklist.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: genx; itsallaboutme; loveandmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: dljordan

living on a river boat is a gamble lol


21 posted on 02/15/2007 11:09:30 AM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

22 posted on 02/15/2007 11:09:52 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wizecrakker

Women can afford to be pickier because we don't "require" a man to support us, hold property for us, drive us around, etcetera. I don't see this as a bad thing. Some feminist types may turn it into a bad thing by carrying it too far, but it's still good. I got married at 23 which is not bad these days. If I'd had to get married at 18 to have someone to pay for my upkeep, I wouldn't have found my perfect match.


23 posted on 02/15/2007 11:15:52 AM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

"I would guess that marriage rates might coincide along red-state, blue-state break downs in a manner that family size and abortion rates do."

Let's look on the bright side -- over time, there will be fewer liberals, and more conservatives. We just have to be patient, and do more of what comes naturally...


24 posted on 02/15/2007 11:17:46 AM PST by Clioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

and if it weren't for women, i'd be rich!


25 posted on 02/15/2007 11:21:16 AM PST by absolootezer0 (stop repeat offenders - don't re-elect them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

I'd hope to be deaf too so I didnt have to listen to you lame ass attempts at humor.


26 posted on 02/15/2007 11:21:18 AM PST by wallcrawlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

The only men who want that are the ones who spend a lot of time on FR bitching and complaining about the lack of good American women, while they look at internet porn in their mothers' basements.


27 posted on 02/15/2007 11:23:35 AM PST by RockinRight (When Chuck Norris goes to bed at night, he checks under the bed for Jack Bauer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JenB
Women can afford to be pickier because we don't "require" a man to support us, hold property for us, drive us around, etcetera. I don't see this as a bad thing. Some feminist types may turn it into a bad thing by carrying it too far, but it's still good. I got married at 23 which is not bad these days. If I'd had to get married at 18 to have someone to pay for my upkeep, I wouldn't have found my perfect match.

My point exactly.

So again... men haven't changed. Women have.

28 posted on 02/15/2007 11:23:49 AM PST by wizecrakker (Trying to behave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
The script says the guy not only must be a good provider, but be drop dead handsome as well as being sensitive, romantic, caring, giving and totally understanding. The only guys like that in real-life already have boyfriends. ;~))

or we're already married :P
29 posted on 02/15/2007 11:24:15 AM PST by absolootezer0 (stop repeat offenders - don't re-elect them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

LOL


30 posted on 02/15/2007 11:26:57 AM PST by wallcrawlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JenB

Im still very young (20), but the prospect of even a girlfriend right now dosent even seem appealing. I just got out of a soul-sucking year-long relationship. I may never get married haha. (sarcastically). But seriously, women these days seem so demanding as the article states, its hard to impress.


31 posted on 02/15/2007 11:28:38 AM PST by gun_supporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JenB

 

 

 

                Phenomenal Woman


 

 

 

Pretty women wonder where my secret lies.
I'm not cute or built to suit a fashion model's size
But when I start to tell them,
They think I'm telling lies.
I say,
It's in the reach of my arms
The span of my hips,
The stride of my step,
The curl of my lips.
I'm a woman
Phenomenally.
Phenomenal woman,
That's me.

I walk into a room
Just as cool as you please,
And to a man,
The fellows stand or
Fall down on their knees.
Then they swarm around me,
A hive of honey bees.
I say,
It's the fire in my eyes,
And the flash of my teeth,
The swing in my waist,
And the joy in my feet.
I'm a woman
Phenomenally.
Phenomenal woman,
That's me.

Men themselves have wondered
What they see in me.
They try so much
But they can't touch
My inner mystery.
When I try to show them
They say they still can't see.
I say,
It's in the arch of my back,
The sun of my smile,
The ride of my breasts,
The grace of my style.
I'm a woman

Phenomenally.
Phenomenal woman,
That's me.

Now you understand
Just why my head's not bowed.
I don't shout or jump about
Or have to talk real loud.
When you see me passing
It ought to make you proud.
I say,
It's in the click of my heels,
The bend of my hair,
the palm of my hand,
The need of my care,
'Cause I'm a woman
Phenomenally.
Phenomenal woman,
That's me.

Maya Angelou

 


32 posted on 02/15/2007 11:31:18 AM PST by Lady Jag (A positive attitude will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

May boundless good fortune be unto you in your quest.


33 posted on 02/15/2007 11:32:07 AM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gun_supporter

Either that, or they are too darn far to the left, like here in Madison, WI.


34 posted on 02/15/2007 11:33:03 AM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: qam1

We MUST stamp-out the evils of Lookism!


35 posted on 02/15/2007 11:54:18 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gun_supporter
its hard to impress

Don't try, it worked for me.

36 posted on 02/15/2007 11:57:10 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ditto; patton
The script says the guy not only must be a good provider, but be drop dead handsome as well as being sensitive, romantic, caring, giving and totally understanding. The only guys like that in real-life already have boyfriends. ;~))

...or married to me :D
37 posted on 02/15/2007 11:58:41 AM PST by leda (The quiet girl on the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight; wallcrawlr
Do I detect the female presence?

I'll have you know that I have my own basement....

38 posted on 02/15/2007 11:59:08 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pete
What really gets me is that they are so busy with their theoretical social agendas that they forget that actions have real consequences.

The left's attitude toward moral misbehavior is to try to have the government take care of the consequences. However, whatever the government subsidizes, society gets more of. So now we have broken families subsidized by liberal governmental policies.

Now we've gone so far that moral misbehavior has to be treated as the same as moral behavior by government in things like "gay marriage". It's all in the name of tolerance and diversity. It's the core belief difference in liberal vs. conservative. Liberals think that people are basically good and have to be helped by government when bad things happen. Conservatives believe that people are basically bad and need to be encouraged by government to be good.

Guess which one pans out historically?
39 posted on 02/15/2007 12:01:01 PM PST by dan1123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

I'm male. Most definitely. So you have your own basement? Good for you.


40 posted on 02/15/2007 12:01:08 PM PST by RockinRight (When Chuck Norris goes to bed at night, he checks under the bed for Jack Bauer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson