Skip to comments.Gladiators Fought To death In Chester (UK)
Posted on 02/17/2007 11:13:57 AM PST by blam
Gladiators fought to the death in Chester
By Nic Fleming, Science Correspondent
Last Updated: 2:09am GMT 17/02/2007
Gladiatorial contests took place at the largest amphitheatre in Roman Britain, according to new evidence unearthed by archaeologists.
An artist's impression of Chester's ampitheatre
Finds at an excavation of the arena in Chester provide the most conclusive proof yet that it played host to grisly fights to the death for public entertainment, and reinforce the view of the town's importance in the Roman Empire.
A stone block with iron fittings was discovered at the centre of the two-storey amphitheatre, which dates back to about AD100. It is similar to one depicted in a 3rd century mosaic found at a Roman villa at Bignor, West Sussex, which shows two gladiators fighting.
It is the third such stone block found at the site and its location suggests the anchors were evenly spaced along the long axis of the arena preventing gladiators from sheltering against the arena wall and thereby giving spectators the best possible view.
Dan Garner, an archaeologist at Chester City Council, said: "Any thought that Chester's amphitheatre was used purely for military purposes such as military tattoos or drill practice can now be firmly banished.
"Up to now, we have found human and animal remains to suggest that gladiatorial games may have taken place, but the discovery of the third chain block put that suggestion almost beyond doubt.
"I dare say that people met a rather brutal end in Chester's arena some 1,900 years ago."
Tony Wilmott, an archaeologist at English Heritage, said: "There are still a number of questions: whether humans or animals were chained; whether the chains were long or short; or whether the chains passed through the ring on the stone allow-ing a degree of free movement.
"It is possible that the blocks were also used for displaying exotic animals or for executing criminals who would be cast into the arena together with violent beasts.
"What is certain is the Romans' flair for mass entertainment. By chaining victims to these blocks along the long axis, they were trying to ensure that spectators had the maximum view of whatever was happening and did so by preventing victims from sheltering against the arena wall, where they could be seen by only half of the audience."
While the archaeologists cannot be sure precisely which forms of gladiatorial encounters were staged in Chester, it is known there was a special type of gladiator called a bestiarius, who was trained to fight different types of animals.
The amphitheatre, 230ft in diameter, was discovered in 2005 beneath the remains of a later, larger arena. Half the site lies beneath a built-up area.
Previous finds include beef ribs, chicken bones, mass-produced Samian pottery bowls depicting gladiatorial scenes, a human tooth and large quantities of yellow sand possibly brought in to soak up the blood.
Also newly discovered is evidence of eight vaulted stairways, known as vomitoria, that opened directly on to the street and served as entrances to the auditorium.
Two foundation stones that formed the base for substantial half-columns have led the archaeologists to conclude there would have been one storey of such columns.
These architectural discoveries have allowed English Heritage experts to create a reconstruction of the height and grandeur of the amphitheatre.
They found the closest parallels to be the Colosseum in Rome and the amphitheatre of El Djem, Tunisia.
Unlike other smaller, more basic amphitheatres in Britain, the one in Chester had proper seating for about 10,000 spectators on two storeys.
The size and elaborate exterior design of the amphitheatre further underline the importance of Chester to the Roman Empire.
The new findings, made as part of a collaboration between English Heritage and Chester City Council, will be presented at the international symposium Roman Amphitheatres and Spectacula: a 21st century perspective, to be held this weekend.
"Chester, Do you like Gladiator Movies?"
No, Mister Dillon.
There was a great show on one of the science channels a while ago, trying to prove that Roman amphitheatres had donut-shaped retractable canvas roofs. They did hands-on experiments on existing ruins that were pretty convincing.
No word about artificial turf yet.
I saw that...it was pretty convincing.
There must have been a lot of gladiatorial combat that wasn't "to the death", for the obvious reason, gambling.
The gamesters of the time would quickly realize that the crowd wanted a good fight far more than a kill. But training good fighters takes time and money. And only a few are ever going to be real crowd pleasers.
You don't want to see such profitable talent hurt or killed.
I imagine that you would see a lot of the elements of professional wrestling in gladiatorial contests. For example, professional "villains", for the "good" gladiators to defeat on a regular basis, on the gladiatorial "circuit".
Of course, the matches would be fixed, not that the crowd minded as long as they got a good show. And there would be death, at their equivalent of the playoffs.
Most fights would be held at small, rural venues all over the empire, and a city would be on the map only when it got its own amphitheater--so every town wanted one.
There are all sorts of possibilities: gladiators killing untrained condemned prisoners would be very popular, especially if the condemned was widely hated. And there was probably all sorts of other entertainment presented at the same time, along with stadium concessions.
Archaeologist's Find Could Shake Up Science (Topper Site)
SP Times | 1-7-2007 | Heather Urquides
Posted on 01/08/2007 2:14:54 PM EST by blam
Yorkshire clan linked to Africa
BBC | Wednesday, January 24, 2007
Posted on 01/24/2007 6:19:12 AM EST by Jedi Master Pikachu
Study provides first genetic evidence of long-lived African presence within Britain
Wellcome Trust via Eureka Science News | Jan 24, 2007 | Craig Brierley
Posted on 01/25/2007 7:39:21 AM EST by Pharmboy
Whoops. That Topper site link was an accident. :')
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
Early crazed Brit fan ping
Getcha hot ribs and chicken wings here!
I can see 10,000 Roman-era Brits doing "The Wave".
At the end of each fatal match, stretcher bearers hustled out on the floor of the arena to collect the fallen gladiator and carry his body to a nearby morgue, or spoliarium. There officials slit the man's throat to ensure that he was truly dead: Roman bettors despised fixed matches..........
As studies of epitaphs show, skilled gladiators rarely survived more than 10 matches, dying on average at the age of 27.
Again, that would be the "playoffs". However, there were a LOT of venues in the Roman Empire, so I imagine that fatalities out in the "'nabes" would either be local boys who wanted to fight each other; or who wanted a crack at "the big time", against a professional gladiator; or condemned prisoners.
But once you hit the major cities, or Rome itself, things got a lot more complicated. You had animal fights, and human-animal fights, battle re-enactments (including the possibility of naval battles with the coliseum flooded!), fighting executions, races, etc.
I also suspect that though most gladiators didn't last long, the majority were put out with injuries. The fighters themselves wouldn't be too keen about most matches ending in a kill.
Hit him again! Hit him again! Harder! Harder!
Plus c'est la meme chose, plus ça change [Frog for: The arena is different, but rednecks are forever]
Wee, they could at least have beer and Clydesdales.