Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Interviewed on Lou Dobbs (Immigration/Foreign Policy)
Lou Dobbs ^ | February 26, 2007

Posted on 02/27/2007 10:02:48 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright

See the video here


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; paul; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 02/27/2007 10:02:50 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Paul for President ping.


2 posted on 02/27/2007 10:03:17 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

Did RuPaul discuss his recent support of the terrorists in Iraq with his vote against the troop reinforcement?

Or maybe his support of Hezbollah AND the terrorists in Iraq with his vote against sanctions against Syria?

Or his encouragment to cut and run from Lebanon way back when Reagan was president?


3 posted on 02/27/2007 10:09:46 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

There's a list of the 17 pubbies who voted for the RAT-led Iraq resolution against our prez. There was one pubby rep:

Representative Ronald Ernest Paul

Phone: 202-225-2831 Web Email

Is this the same Ron Paul that's running for prez in '08?


4 posted on 02/27/2007 10:10:15 AM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
Did RuPaul discuss his recent support of the terrorists

No, but he said that he'd stop beating his wife.

5 posted on 02/27/2007 10:11:02 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

Are you joking? He may have a clue on internal politics but Ron Paul is a defeatist, isolationist coward. He has NO idea on Foreign Policy and the War in Terror and voted with the Democrats for surrender in Iraq.



6 posted on 02/27/2007 10:11:04 AM PST by SolidWood (Attack Iran NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Ron Paul a coward? LOL. That's the last thing any of his poll-watching/focus group colleages on either side of the aisle would say about Ron Paul.


7 posted on 02/27/2007 10:12:35 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

How would you describe his stance on the War on Terror and his vote in the House on Iraq?


8 posted on 02/27/2007 10:14:18 AM PST by SolidWood (Attack Iran NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

"Is this the same Ron Paul that's running for prez in '08?"

Same RuPaul.


9 posted on 02/27/2007 10:14:19 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

Carol could kick RuPaul flabby ass.


10 posted on 02/27/2007 10:15:05 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Ron Paul a coward? LOL

Does it matter what other people think or what he does?
He is a coward, a dangerous coward at that.
11 posted on 02/27/2007 10:15:09 AM PST by msnimje (The Pro-Life movement is about winning Converts to the cause. Why attack the converted?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
dangerous coward

A dangerous coward. Well....I guess that's progress. Most of the Ron Paul haters in the past have depicted him as a an ineffective quixotic "Dr No." Now, they appeared to be worried that he could actually have success in the primaries.

12 posted on 02/27/2007 10:17:15 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood
How would you describe his stance on the War on Terror and his vote in the House on Iraq?

Sure. Ron Paul is for the WOT, hence he supported the Afghan War and proposed putting a bounty on Bin-Laden's head. He is against nation-building/Wilsonian wars like Kosovo and Iraq.

13 posted on 02/27/2007 10:19:09 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Now, they appeared to be worried that he could actually have success in the primaries.

He will not win, place or show in the primaries.

In fact, he probably will not be in the race on Feb 5, 2008.

No serious student of politics is worried about Ron Paul.
14 posted on 02/27/2007 10:24:36 AM PST by msnimje (The Pro-Life movement is about winning Converts to the cause. Why attack the converted?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

He should team up with Dobbs as his VP and run as liberaltarians.


15 posted on 02/27/2007 10:24:41 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Ron Paul is for the WOT, hence he supported the Afghan War (and proposed putting a bounty on Bin-Laden's head.)

Sounds like most Democrats. Yet they (and Ron Paul) stand for defeat and surrender on the central front (Iraq) in the WoT.

Critisising nation-building is one thing... condemning the President for a troop "surge" which serves to crack down on Jihadists is cowardly, populistic and seditious.

Dream on... he has enough support to be a Congressman. Nothing more.

16 posted on 02/27/2007 10:27:52 AM PST by SolidWood (Attack Iran NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

Ron Paul -- The K-Fed of Presidential Hopefuls!


17 posted on 02/27/2007 10:31:25 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
At least Ron seems to be on the right side of the fence from what I read on this FR-Banned Website
18 posted on 02/27/2007 10:36:37 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

Excellect interview. I sent RP a check last week. All those freepers who badmouth RP are completely ignorant of the U.S. Constitution.


19 posted on 02/27/2007 10:47:04 AM PST by hubbubhubbub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

Ron Paul? He's not been relevant since...er...never, I guess.


20 posted on 02/27/2007 11:35:18 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson