Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China to produce jumbo sized jets by 2020
Aviation & AEROSPACE ^ | 13 March 2007 | Staff

Posted on 03/14/2007 5:26:44 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Paleo Conservative

Don't forget the new Aircraft Carriers!!!!....


21 posted on 03/14/2007 7:06:01 PM PDT by GitmoSailor (Cold War Veteran===Beware of the IDs of Marx=Fairness Doctrine,3rd party,Slow Bleed+Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
"According to the Xinhua news agency, the blueprint for the large aircraft project will be completed by 2010."

"According to the Xinhua news agency, the blueprint for the large aircraft project has been completed and is sitting on a table at Bowing as we speak."

There, I fixed it.

22 posted on 03/15/2007 12:37:19 AM PDT by Desron13 (If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Lemme guess - first a Soyuz clone, and now an Ilyushin clone. I love how the Russians are sharing their cutting-edge technology with the Chinese.


23 posted on 03/15/2007 2:32:39 AM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Certainly they can steal airplane designs in less than 3 years.

They need another Democrat president in the U.S. for wholesale transfers of technology in case they run into any brick walls in the design.
24 posted on 03/15/2007 5:58:50 AM PDT by JayNorth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vox humana
I could never understand why it was named Airbus. Who would want to fly in a bus? Traveling by bus is not the most comfortable way to go.

Yeah, bad marketing decision on their part to choose such a pedestrian name.

Kinda like "Volkswagen".

25 posted on 03/15/2007 2:32:45 PM PDT by zipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DWPittelli
All they need is to get Loral et al to keep donating through the next two Clinton terms.

In regards to what happened with Loral and the Clintons; I think alot of Freepers have been either reading too many Tom Clancy novels or watching too many cloak and dagger movies.

China's ability to put someone into space or build a commercial aircraft takes more than just a handful of wayward foreign scientists passing on information to them.

It takes a well thoughout industry with an experienced workforce (in this case aerospace) to achieve such goals. It takes thousands upon thousands of engineers and technicians, tens of thousands of workers and an even larger community of workers that support supplying industries.

It takes responsbile political leaders, responsbile fiancial accounting and even good civic responsibility. And China has been able to put it all together.

China has been gaining experience in aerospace by openly bidding for subcontract work to both Boeing and Airbus (no cloak and dagger there, all out in the open). China also have tremendous leverage with Boeing and Airbus. Because of the potential for future growth of China's air travel industry, both Boeing and Airbus have been bending over backwards to help China. Once again, no material here for a Tom Clancy Novel.

26 posted on 03/16/2007 11:27:29 AM PDT by ponder life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ponder life
In terms of what it takes to physically manifest extremely tech-intense engineering feats, you are of course correct. China has, has had, will have, and will undoubtedly expand their skilled workforce on an ongoing and relentless basis. If they had only 50's aerospace technology and were somehow blocked from anything more modern, I think it's safe to say they would expand the effort and ability to produce same on the assumption that they would eventually acquire more up to date tech.

However, culturally, the Chinese are masters or at least strong proponents of copying anything they crave or think they can make a buck or a yuan on. At the same time, they are NOT blazing originators known for the type of super-creative thinking that comes up with satellite or other ultra-high tech. That's borne out by the tremendous piracy of CD's & DVD's and computer software going on over there and hundreds of other examples. So although it takes masses of engineers and huge plant to produce "an airplane" or "a satellite", one guy bringing in a set of blueprints can have a tremendous impact when the factories, machine tools, and zillions of motivated workers are already in place. I think it's safe to say the Chinese are relentless acquirers of any technology they (meaning their military and political leaders) decide they want, and are smart enough to realize that stealing it, forcibly co-oping it, borrowing it, or buying it are all vastly cheaper than self-developing it.

27 posted on 03/16/2007 1:35:44 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (When Bubba lies, the finger flies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
I would agree with you on everything you said. But that was all true with other Asian countries as well. From Taiwan, S. Korea and long ago, even Japan. But as these countries moved along, they realized they had to innovate to continue expanding their revenue base. They had to innovate and do their own R&D.

I believe China will get there someday. They may have to make some painful adjustments like enforcing copyright laws, but I believe it will happen.

28 posted on 03/18/2007 6:32:44 PM PDT by ponder life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I willing to bet Airbus then Boeing will be in Banckrupty within 20 to 25 years.


29 posted on 03/20/2007 8:03:07 AM PDT by LM_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson