Skip to comments.
Fred Thompson's Wife Urges Run For White House!
Townhall.com ^
| Saturday, March 24, 2007
| Robert D. Novak
Posted on 03/24/2007 6:49:59 AM PDT by TitansAFC
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-134 next last
To: TitansAFC
Hey bud, don't you ever forget to ping me again on a Fred Thompson thread--and I mean it! ;^)
61
posted on
03/24/2007 8:43:17 AM PDT
by
dmw
(Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
To: philman_36
"W" Opting Out (Fred Thompson's Wife Urges Run For White House!)
Such a simple solution.
Would you still have passed on by without looking?
That would do the trick.
62
posted on
03/24/2007 8:46:34 AM PDT
by
rob777
(Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
To: rob777
Thanks!
I wasn't sure exactly how to post a link via a link.
63
posted on
03/24/2007 8:47:18 AM PDT
by
TitansAFC
("My 80% enemy is not my 20% friend" -- Common Sense)
To: Chode
Oh, and I should add that only four incumbent VPs have ever been elected President: John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Martin Van Buren, and George H.W. Bush.
Only two, van Buren and Bush, did so after the passage of the 12th Amendment, which established separate votes for President and Vice President (and led to same-party "running mates"). George H.W. Bush was the first VP to win in 170 years. Jefferson was the only one to serve two terms, and the only one to become President by defeating the incumbent President. Richard Nixon is the only other man besides those four to be elected President after serving a full term as VP.
Sorry, I had to indulge my useless trivia obsession, though there might be some relevance here.
64
posted on
03/24/2007 8:50:15 AM PDT
by
The Pack Knight
(A fine is a tax on doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.)
To: Crawdad
Novak must be disappointed if that's the worst thing he can come up with about Thompson.Wait until he announces he's in. The libs will try to make him look as bad as possible.
65
posted on
03/24/2007 8:51:01 AM PDT
by
Just Lori
(There's nothing democratic about Democrats.)
To: manic4organic
66
posted on
03/24/2007 8:51:02 AM PDT
by
TitansAFC
("My 80% enemy is not my 20% friend" -- Common Sense)
To: TitansAFC
Run, Fred, run. Let's liven up this race and throw RINOs and Dems into paroxysms of paranoia.
67
posted on
03/24/2007 8:51:11 AM PDT
by
rhema
("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
To: manic4organic
68
posted on
03/24/2007 8:51:49 AM PDT
by
TitansAFC
("My 80% enemy is not my 20% friend" -- Common Sense)
To: philman_36
I don't wear panties, smart guy.
It's an expression, dumb ass. (if I'm a "smart guy" then you must be a dumb ass for not knowing it's an expression)
I know it's an expression, I'm responding in kind, get it 'dumb ass'?
As for Novak's spinning his involvement in the whole sorry matter, all he had to do was have somebody call him on the phone and say 'hey, I'm a confidential source, Armitage is the leaker', and had he proceeded to publish that fact, the entire Fitzgerald prosecution would have fallen apart inside of a day or so.
If Novak had ended up being questioned about his 'confidential source', he could have said "hey, I just got a phone call, I only reported the tip." - what would HE have been prosecuted for? Telling the truth?
69
posted on
03/24/2007 8:58:43 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
To: Sioux-san
70
posted on
03/24/2007 8:59:25 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
To: capt. norm
i>The moment he announces his candidacy, they have to take the Law & Order episode with him in them off the air (including re-runs).
That's very interesting. That effects ALOT of people's incomes....alot of people who really depend on that money. That's alot of pressure.
71
posted on
03/24/2007 9:02:42 AM PDT
by
Hildy
To: mkjessup
...all he had to do was have somebody call him on the phone and say 'hey, I'm a confidential source, Armitage is the leaker'...
Why would he have somebody call and tell him what he already knew? And wouldn't telling somebody so that they could call him be violating his confidentiality agreement?
...and had he proceeded to publish that fact, the entire Fitzgerald prosecution would have fallen apart inside of a day or so.
All together your reply is one of the dumbest things I've ever read. Just my opinion.
To: jonrick46
I'm partial to the tasty lil half-smirk she's sporting. Rest of her not too bad either.
To: The Pack Knight
but i'd rather take my chances of him winning from the VPOTUS slot than his sitting on the outside running against some RAT that's been there for four or eight years... 8^)
74
posted on
03/24/2007 9:10:16 AM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: philman_36
You don't get it Phil, Novak having someone call him as a new 'confidential source' would have given him wiggle room to publish the truth about Armitage, i.e. 'CYA', which is always the most important thing in the world of journalism.
That you don't 'get it' really comes as no surprise to me.
Armitage didn't come forward, neither did Colin Powell, Fitzgerald sure wasn't being up front, so as the publisher of the original 'Plame' story, Novak should have been the one to set things straight.
How about now Phil? Is it becoming a little easier to understand?
75
posted on
03/24/2007 9:10:25 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
To: mkjessup
You don't get it Phil, Novak having someone call him as a new 'confidential source' would have given him wiggle room to publish the truth about Armitage, i.e. 'CYA', which is always the most important thing in the world of journalism.
And how would this new person know to call Novak to be his "new" source? Novak would have to tell somebody who hios source was first.
No YOU don't get it. You obviously don't know what a confidentiality agreement is and you've shown that you can't keep a person's confidence. If you advocate doing a thing then you would do it as well.
I advise you never speak to the press since you've got no problem with the reporter you told something to in confidence telling someone else.
Protecting your confidential source's identity is always the most important thing in the world of journalism. The public wouldn't know anything if journalists did what you suggest because nobody would feel safe telling them anything.
To: mkjessup
And for that matter since other people at the Justice Dept. already knew for up to three months it was Armitage why didn't one of them do anything?
Everybody knows how the Justice Dept. has all kinds of "confidential sources" who just love giving out info all of the time.
To: Chode
That's true. His best bet would be as Governor of California, but that ain't gonna happen.
78
posted on
03/24/2007 9:33:03 AM PDT
by
The Pack Knight
(A fine is a tax on doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.)
To: Republican Babe
She's very intelligent and a former political operative, not some bimbo.
I don't think cleavage will cost Fred votes from the male population, only jealous harridans.
79
posted on
03/24/2007 9:40:33 AM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(Thompson/Watts in 2008!! Fear the Fred!!)
To: TitansAFC
The major rap against Thompson is that he was not a hard worker during his eight years in the Senate. And that is a bad thing because? Government doing less is a GOOD thing in my estimation. It's something to be encouraged not labeled as a "major rap", whatever that is.
80
posted on
03/24/2007 9:42:20 AM PDT
by
mc5cents
(Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-134 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson