Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson's Wife Urges Run For White House!
Townhall.com ^ | Saturday, March 24, 2007 | Robert D. Novak

Posted on 03/24/2007 6:49:59 AM PDT by TitansAFC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-134 next last
To: TitansAFC
Hey bud, don't you ever forget to ping me again on a Fred Thompson thread--and I mean it! ;^)
61 posted on 03/24/2007 8:43:17 AM PDT by dmw (Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

"W" Opting Out (Fred Thompson's Wife Urges Run For White House!)

Such a simple solution.

Would you still have passed on by without looking?




That would do the trick.


62 posted on 03/24/2007 8:46:34 AM PDT by rob777 (Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rob777

Thanks!

I wasn't sure exactly how to post a link via a link.


63 posted on 03/24/2007 8:47:18 AM PDT by TitansAFC ("My 80% enemy is not my 20% friend" -- Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Chode
Oh, and I should add that only four incumbent VPs have ever been elected President: John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Martin Van Buren, and George H.W. Bush.

Only two, van Buren and Bush, did so after the passage of the 12th Amendment, which established separate votes for President and Vice President (and led to same-party "running mates"). George H.W. Bush was the first VP to win in 170 years. Jefferson was the only one to serve two terms, and the only one to become President by defeating the incumbent President. Richard Nixon is the only other man besides those four to be elected President after serving a full term as VP.

Sorry, I had to indulge my useless trivia obsession, though there might be some relevance here.
64 posted on 03/24/2007 8:50:15 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (A fine is a tax on doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Crawdad
Novak must be disappointed if that's the worst thing he can come up with about Thompson.

Wait until he announces he's in. The libs will try to make him look as bad as possible.

65 posted on 03/24/2007 8:51:01 AM PDT by Just Lori (There's nothing democratic about Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: manic4organic

66 posted on 03/24/2007 8:51:02 AM PDT by TitansAFC ("My 80% enemy is not my 20% friend" -- Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Run, Fred, run. Let's liven up this race and throw RINOs and Dems into paroxysms of paranoia.


67 posted on 03/24/2007 8:51:11 AM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manic4organic

68 posted on 03/24/2007 8:51:49 AM PDT by TitansAFC ("My 80% enemy is not my 20% friend" -- Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
I don't wear panties, smart guy.
It's an expression, dumb ass. (if I'm a "smart guy" then you must be a dumb ass for not knowing it's an expression)
I know it's an expression, I'm responding in kind, get it 'dumb ass'?

As for Novak's spinning his involvement in the whole sorry matter, all he had to do was have somebody call him on the phone and say 'hey, I'm a confidential source, Armitage is the leaker', and had he proceeded to publish that fact, the entire Fitzgerald prosecution would have fallen apart inside of a day or so.

If Novak had ended up being questioned about his 'confidential source', he could have said "hey, I just got a phone call, I only reported the tip." - what would HE have been prosecuted for? Telling the truth?
69 posted on 03/24/2007 8:58:43 AM PDT by mkjessup (If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

See #69


70 posted on 03/24/2007 8:59:25 AM PDT by mkjessup (If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
i>The moment he announces his candidacy, they have to take the Law & Order episode with him in them off the air (including re-runs).

That's very interesting. That effects ALOT of people's incomes....alot of people who really depend on that money. That's alot of pressure.

71 posted on 03/24/2007 9:02:42 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
...all he had to do was have somebody call him on the phone and say 'hey, I'm a confidential source, Armitage is the leaker'...
Why would he have somebody call and tell him what he already knew? And wouldn't telling somebody so that they could call him be violating his confidentiality agreement?
...and had he proceeded to publish that fact, the entire Fitzgerald prosecution would have fallen apart inside of a day or so.
All together your reply is one of the dumbest things I've ever read. Just my opinion.
72 posted on 03/24/2007 9:06:38 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

I'm partial to the tasty lil half-smirk she's sporting. Rest of her not too bad either.


73 posted on 03/24/2007 9:09:59 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
Image hosted by Photobucket.com but i'd rather take my chances of him winning from the VPOTUS slot than his sitting on the outside running against some RAT that's been there for four or eight years... 8^)
74 posted on 03/24/2007 9:10:16 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
You don't get it Phil, Novak having someone call him as a new 'confidential source' would have given him wiggle room to publish the truth about Armitage, i.e. 'CYA', which is always the most important thing in the world of journalism.

That you don't 'get it' really comes as no surprise to me.

Armitage didn't come forward, neither did Colin Powell, Fitzgerald sure wasn't being up front, so as the publisher of the original 'Plame' story, Novak should have been the one to set things straight.

How about now Phil? Is it becoming a little easier to understand?
75 posted on 03/24/2007 9:10:25 AM PDT by mkjessup (If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
You don't get it Phil, Novak having someone call him as a new 'confidential source' would have given him wiggle room to publish the truth about Armitage, i.e. 'CYA', which is always the most important thing in the world of journalism.
And how would this new person know to call Novak to be his "new" source? Novak would have to tell somebody who hios source was first.
No YOU don't get it. You obviously don't know what a confidentiality agreement is and you've shown that you can't keep a person's confidence. If you advocate doing a thing then you would do it as well.
I advise you never speak to the press since you've got no problem with the reporter you told something to in confidence telling someone else.
Protecting your confidential source's identity is always the most important thing in the world of journalism. The public wouldn't know anything if journalists did what you suggest because nobody would feel safe telling them anything.
76 posted on 03/24/2007 9:24:18 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
And for that matter since other people at the Justice Dept. already knew for up to three months it was Armitage why didn't one of them do anything?
Everybody knows how the Justice Dept. has all kinds of "confidential sources" who just love giving out info all of the time.
77 posted on 03/24/2007 9:32:57 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Chode

That's true. His best bet would be as Governor of California, but that ain't gonna happen.


78 posted on 03/24/2007 9:33:03 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (A fine is a tax on doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Republican Babe

She's very intelligent and a former political operative, not some bimbo.

I don't think cleavage will cost Fred votes from the male population, only jealous harridans.


79 posted on 03/24/2007 9:40:33 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Thompson/Watts in 2008!! Fear the Fred!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
The major rap against Thompson is that he was not a hard worker during his eight years in the Senate.

And that is a bad thing because? Government doing less is a GOOD thing in my estimation. It's something to be encouraged not labeled as a "major rap", whatever that is.

80 posted on 03/24/2007 9:42:20 AM PDT by mc5cents (Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson