Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New footage released on Iranian TV
Sky News ^

Posted on 03/29/2007 9:29:22 AM PDT by UKrepublican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-177 last
To: Mr. Silverback

Good point. Leftism/Liberalism is truly a mental illness.


161 posted on 03/30/2007 2:28:46 PM PDT by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

Three carriers? My, my.


162 posted on 03/30/2007 5:24:47 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
I really don't know what the UK and US can do in this situation. The most effective option would be to start bombing Iranian military assets but under what authority? There is not a state of declared war and UN resolutions authorizing military responses are months away (if ever).

Excellent question. We should be able to act simply because the Iranians have egregiously violated international law. Sure, the UN will whine, but they whined when we invaded a country that had a hijacking school complete with a Boeing airliner for use as a training aid.

As for options? Here's my plan:

1. Give the Iranians until a certain date (soon!) to release the troops.

2. If the date passes, destroy the entire Iranian Navy and all its shore facilities. Optionally, we could do it to the Revolutionary Guard instead, but their Navy, though not great, is far more dangerous to our naval personnel than the Guard. Probably the best way to go is Navy first, Guard second, then ask the Air Force and Army if they want any. It won't take long for two carrier groups to accomplish this, and part of the plan would be to move some Air Force and Marine assets into Iraq before pulling the trigger.

3. During step 2, destroy all Iranian nuke facilities.

4. Level the single petroleum refinery in Iran. See how the government does when their military and the populace have to do without fuel. Actually, this might fit in during step 1, because if they haven't already put a mess of air defense around it, they will.

5. Kill any tanker that tries to carry gas to Iran.

6. Enjoy footage of the hostages coming home, Ahmadinejad getting the Mussolini treatment or both.

Oh, one last thing: Call it Operation Salamis.

163 posted on 03/30/2007 6:05:27 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

No, he's not being sarcastic, he's dead on. Going full on--especially nuclear--against Iran is like deciding to wipe out all the American liberals, and putting New York, Los Angeles, Provo and Crawford, TX on your target list.


164 posted on 03/30/2007 6:12:13 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

Maybe not...isn't Nimitz replacing Eisenhower?


165 posted on 03/30/2007 6:21:34 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

The Revolutionary Guards will probably keep trying to grab hostages every chance they get.


166 posted on 03/30/2007 6:24:53 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
. . .Ahmadinejad getting the Mussolini treatment . . .

If only. The enemy then was never given the 'benefit of the doubt'. . .they were recognized for they were. . .and what they justly deserved.

167 posted on 03/30/2007 6:52:14 PM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon
. . .and this IS the hand-writing of the signee?

(Whatever. . .but for sure. . .they know the DNC talking points. . .) Wish the media and surely every fricking Repub in Leadership. . .would spend more time pointing out how very 'Democratic' (as in Demrat. . .). . .they sound.

168 posted on 03/30/2007 6:56:43 PM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

"Maybe not...isn't Nimitz replacing Eisenhower?"

Yes, but that does not mean Ike will leave once Nimitz gets there.

Linoln had been on station for almost 11 months when W flew onboard.


169 posted on 03/31/2007 4:38:57 AM PDT by ryan71 (You can hear it on the coconut telegraph...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican

Blair has his chance to fix his legacy.


170 posted on 03/31/2007 5:41:00 PM PDT by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon
To the Iran nutball

'Uhmm no not yet, but keep pushing the 'bomb me button' and its bound to happen at some point'

171 posted on 03/31/2007 8:57:00 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon

The only thing missing is "Allah willing" and "Allah Akbar" punctuating the sentences.

Gotta' love the misspellings as well.


172 posted on 03/31/2007 9:10:46 PM PDT by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon
Sounds like it could have been written by A) the MooLahs, B) a democrat in congress or C) a poster at KoS/DU

Well they all most likely all had a hand in the thinking leading up to it anyway.

173 posted on 03/31/2007 10:21:58 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: zendari

A side note to this story, we have MASSIVE elections in May, about a month away.

Blairs handling of this could save his parties ass in the election, or it could make it a hell of a lot worse.

The falklands did Thatcher a MASSIVE favour, and likewise, while we're not talking military confrontation, should it continue to esculate, and Blair gets tougher and tougher, it could do him some good.


174 posted on 04/01/2007 5:08:49 AM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

RockinRight wrote:

Which is why I'm asking the question. It needs to be done.


Especially since Iran declared War on us in the 70's during the hostage crisis, and we have never responded.


175 posted on 04/02/2007 10:27:57 AM PDT by AmericanDave (It's like Deja Vu, all over again............ Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sinclair

"Oh, he!! yeah. After all it worked so well in Iraq."

Why it hasn't worked in Iraq is due to Iran and Syria. If we take out Iran, Syria will be sitting up and paying attention...


176 posted on 04/02/2007 10:29:30 AM PDT by AmericanDave (It's like Deja Vu, all over again............ Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave
"Why it hasn't worked in Iraq..."

Why it hasn't worked in Iraq is because we have our collective testicles securely stashed away in a lock box in Queen Pelosi's congressional office closet and there is zero chance we will be allowed to retrieve them any time soon.


177 posted on 04/02/2007 10:39:28 AM PDT by sinclair (ou have never tasted freedom my friend. Else you would know, it is purchased not with gold, but with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-177 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson