[Petronski]

Ungrateful social conservatives, vowing to seek revenge for his failure to back Toomey, took it out on him in 2006 by voting him out of office.

Prove it.

Meanwhile, I note that a President Rudy (heaven forbid) would sign a repeal of the ban on partial birth abortion, making this decision moot.

[writeblock]

“Meanwhile, I note that a President Rudy (heaven forbid) would sign a repeal of the ban on partial birth abortion, making this decision moot.”

First, Bush would never sign such a repeal. Second, the Supreme Court does more than affirm this law. It allows the states to pass similar laws—which many will do pronto.

[Petronski]

Get a load of this garbage.

[avacado]

"Meanwhile, I note that a President Rudy (heaven forbid) would sign a repeal of the ban on partial birth abortion, making this decision moot."

PROVE IT!

[gonewt]

note that a President Rudy (heaven forbid) would sign a repeal of the ban on partial birth abortion

Really? Have you read Giuliani's comments on today's court decision?

[hinckley buzzard]

Meanwhile, I note that a President Rudy (heaven forbid) would sign a repeal of the ban on partial birth abortion, making this decision moot

A "President Rudy" would mean a Republican Congress, which would never pass such a repeal, and thus no occasion for anyone to "sign" it. So your anxiety attack is unwarranted and moot.

[Lancey Howard]

Meanwhile, I note that a President Rudy (heaven forbid) would sign a repeal of the ban on partial birth abortion, making this decision moot.

Except it will never be repealed:
1. If Rudy is elected he will likley bring a GOP House with him, and maybe a GOP Senate;
2. The GOP would filibuster such an attempt to repeal the ban even if the rats were stupid enough to commit political suicide and try it.