Heck, even Forrest Gump was smart enough to figure out that sometimes, sh!t just happens.Posted on 04/20/2007 10:26:44 AM PDT by Thunder90
Remember this April 19th (Waco Anniversary): the BATF is the Armed Forces of the international Gun Control lobby!
It’s still in the Constitution. It’s still the law of the land.
Have a nice day.
“Max Schlusselberg ... is a freshman majoring in journalism.”
Just some dopey kid.
“2nd Amendment out of date”
I keep going to the clerk’s office to see if marriage
license has expired, and they keep saying `No’.
Just another college dumba$$ writing in another dumba$$ college newspaper.
Heck, even Forrest Gump was smart enough to figure out that sometimes, sh!t just happens.Yep They seem to think that if all guns
are outlawed, the modern outlaws will obey
the law and NOT obtain weapons! Idiots.
Besides, he suggests the ridiculous premise
that our society no longer faces the Wild
West dangers of roaming animals and maurading
savages. Those are pretty apt nomenclatures
for the Manson’s, Speck’s, Gacy’s, Bundy’s and
Cho’s.
If you Google the author’s name, you’ll find that he has written several articles/columns for the Badger Herald that mark him as a member of the fascist left right down the line, from hating Pres. Bush, to decrying the war, to trivializing Saddam’s death, to global warming, and so on. In other words, he’s your average jounalism major. Nothing special about this clown.
Every American has the right to propose and work for any amendments to the Constitution he thinks are appropriate.
And the rest of us have the right to oppose those changes if we think they’re a bad idea.
It’s only when the courts short-circuit this process that problems arise.
Who is this NAZI?
"Let us reason together"
Here’s a thought, a la Rush’s “demonstrating obsurdity with obsurdity.”
I suggest creating a Bill of Non-Rights to document exactly those things liberals advocate. If you amend the Constitution by removing the 2nd amendment you will have in affect taken a right away. So it only seems appropriate to deliniate these non-rights so that they will stand out as special, as the “Bill of Rights” does.
It would go like —
1. NO right to free speech when in regard to hate, race, or other special groups to be addend on to as libs see fit.
2. No right to protect one’s self by possessing personal fire arms — period.
etc.
Someone please feel free to continue with this. When any of the 10 non-rights are brought up by the libs we can begin to refer to them as such.
The Second Amendment is vital to repelling tyranny, whcih is why liberals hate it so much.
Gun control has an evil downside...Genocide.
Our Founding Fathers valued the rights of the individual, and sought to protect those rights.
That is why they gave us a bicameral legislature.
That is why they gave us the electoral college.
And that is why they gave us a Constitutional Republic, rather than a "democracy".
My friends at JPFO would call him a lampshade.
Here is some of the kid's brilliant writing.
"Whoever imagined..."
"...weapons that none should possess..."
"It is time that we take firm steps to eradicate this epidemic, and it most certainly can be done."
The saddest part of this paragraph is that malaria has not been eradicated. Millions still die from it because DDT was banned by libs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.