Skip to comments.Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?
Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.
One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to rule over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.
All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.
FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?
Do you really expect me to do that?
You are just being a mean old poopoo head when you say things like that because Rudy wouldn't EVER do that! He's America's mayor, the hero of 9/11 Rudy Rudy Rudy!
Reagan signed what at the time was the most liberal expansion of abortion in this country. We got two pro abort Supreme Court judges too.
But it’s what they do, attack other conservatives for having policies that are like Rudy’s.
It’s like they don’t WANT anybody to support their candidate. If you even TRY to support one of his policies, they are as likely as not to attack you for it the next time you post anything they don’t like.
I love that picture. Rush to the right of Arnold, Rudy to the left.
“On social issues, Rudy is liberal. On everything else, hes a conservative.”
That simply isn’t true. Even when we Conservatives were defending him when the media decided they had to remove him (before 9/11), we knew he was anti-conservative.
Peach you have some conservative ideas, but you are no conservative.
I’m hoping I didn’t need a sarcasm tag for that last post, but on this thread maybe I better add one, so no one does get me confused with a real Rudy supporter.
You really shouldn't post stuff like that; it shows your ignornace of what went on during the Clinton administration.
Well you know what? I’ll save that one. Thanks so much for finding that! I don’t know how you do it, but I’m glad you did.
“What did quidnick (sp?) do to get banned?”
Go back and look, post 50 I believe.
Fool forgot who he was talking to.
And got the God-Zot.
(And yes, your spelling was incorrect.)
So you prefer Hillary, then? -quidnunc (Since 1998-09-15)
...Up yours asswipe. -Jim Robinson
...This account has been banned or suspended.
I’d respond if your post made sense. But since it doesn’t, I’ll just let it stand.
I agree with your well reasoned post. Many people would have handled the aftermath of 9/11 as well or better than Rudy. It is ludicrous that the above actions translate into Rudy will fight the WOT better than any other Republican.
When Romney went up a couple of points in the polls, they threw a bunch of stuff about a speech he gave in Florida that was misleading.
When Thompson came on board and started getting poll traction they started with the “he’s mormon” and “he’s a lobbyist” and “he gave money to clinton” and “he’s a DC politician”, a “career politician”, and “a globalist”.
SOmetimes they go after people with no movement, like Hunter.
So a 9 year freeper in good standing asks Jim if he prefers Hillary to Rudy and he gets banned and you think that’s justified? Wow.
You forgot the part where you, who has been here less than a week, cheered because he was banned.
Check your Freepmail.
And such lovely language too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.