Skip to comments.Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?
Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.
One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to rule over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.
All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.
FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?
Do you really expect me to do that?
???? PLease tell me you don't realistically believe this to be a good idea.
Quid has been a good poster for 9 years and gets banned for that innocuous post? Ridiculous.
Anyone who is “pro-choice”, or pro-abortion is promoting a culture of death.
That’s probably because they are very rare. Probably about as rare as pro abortion, pro gay rights, pro gun control, pro illegal alien Republican candidates for president. They’re one of a kind and hopefully not too successful.
I couldn't encourage you more to do so.
This thread is absolutely mesmerizing.
Wahh. Boo hoo.
Maybe it’s time to start throwing the queer term around like you were a few months ago. Homo seems a little too PC.
Though I tried I’ve yet to see anyone refute my post 200.
I stand by it.
Wait a second. Is clueless different than dumbest? I thought that was MY award. I want a recount.
I am amused by people for whom the latest thing they see is always the "most" something, like "the dumbest", the stupidest", the "most clueless", etc;. I wonder if those people have very short memories, or if they have really lived a sheltered life up until that moment.
I mostly encounter that kind of post on a liberal site when they are feigning outrage over some perceived conservative slight.
So let’s see. We can’t speak badly of other unannounced candidates. We can’t speak badly of announced candidates.
But we can have spam, name calling, swear words, pictures of partial birth abortions, etc., on Rudy threads. Got it.
Just wanted to make sure I was up on all the new frickin rules. (I just love that we can talk this way now; it adds to much to the conversation).
You might want to stay tuned. He got a link, ace.
Yes. If I keep repeating the same thing often enough, people might believe it.
Or maybe I simply kept repeating the same thing as I was reading through linearly a large and rapidly growing thread, and had posted that consistant message several times before I read a post which pointed it out to me.
I vote for 2. I’ve never been able to get people to listen to me by repeating myself.
Does she give a little statuette out with these Howlie Awards?
I have no idea. I’ve written that down. Thanks again!
What’s a matter? You don’t like homosexuals? Are you a homophobe?
Because you were so undecided before 2:30 am?
I replied to that post. It was excellent.
I don't recall having said anything about you.
Since you're here, could you kindly tell me how promoting a pro-abortion anti-gun candidate furthers the conservative cause?