Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's absolutely crucial to the conservative pro life movement to block Giuliani!
Vanity/The American Spectator ^ | 4/19/2007 | By W. James Antle III

Posted on 04/26/2007 1:26:07 AM PDT by Jim Robinson

It's absolutely crucial to the conservative pro life movement to block the pro choice, pro gay agenda Rudy Giuliani from obtaining the GOP nomination. It would kill the movement and ultimately destroy the credibility of the GOP.

Excerpts from the American Spectator:

The Real Deal

4/19/2007

~~snip~~

"Despite the calls to leave litmus tests behind, pro-life Rudy reluctance is justified. If nominated, Giuliani would be the most pro-choice Republican presidential candidate in history. Even Gerald Ford, an archetypal Republican for choice, backed a constitutional amendment overturning Roe v. Wade during the 1976 campaign. Barry Goldwater, who was nominated before abortion became a national issue and outspokenly pro-choice in retirement, backed the human life amendment in his final Senate race."

"Giuliani has feted NARAL and Planned Parenthood. He has praised Margaret Sanger and repeatedly accused mainstream pro-lifers of wanting to put pregnant women in jail. His concessions to date have been minor and offered without enthusiasm."

"Abortion opponents can ill afford to give up their leverage in the GOP. Their position has little support among the cultural elite; many in the Republican establishment would like nothing better than to “get beyond issues like that.” If pro-lifers support Giuliani because he “hates” abortion, it will be difficult for them to criticize “personally opposed” Democrats like John Kerry in the future. Their campaign to get bishops to withhold communion from pro-choice Catholic Democrats will seem partisan and hypocritical. And the whole movement may be seen as less serious and less influential."

~~snip~~

Don't be fooled. Don't betray your principles or the cause due to fear of Hillary and the moonbats. Would Ronald Reagan cower in fear and betray his principles?

Keep the faith!!

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; elections; giuliani; prolife; stoprudy2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-136 next last
To: GSlob

Machiavelli is for the same kind of personality that reads the Art of War. Neither have any real application, but offer good justification for bad decisions.


51 posted on 04/26/2007 4:34:43 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cloud8
It’s about who is the best choice to defeat the clintns and lead the Global War on Terror.

Rudy is not going to beat Hillary. No way.

And Rudy is one of the least qualified to lead the GWOT.

So if those are your criteria, your backing the wrong man.

52 posted on 04/26/2007 4:35:24 AM PDT by airborne (Duncan Hunter is the only real choice for honest to goodness conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Yes, I read that one before. “Nihilists” at work.

I remember the discussions at the Collegiate level in my house of “existentialism”, “Nietzsche”, “Dostoyevsky”, etc. as a child in the very early 1960’s. So early in the ‘60’s I believe the dirt was still being tossed on the grave of 1959. Ad nauseum the discussions went on.

Although the link I provide below can, and probably will cause some to become brain numbed as well cause eyes to glaze over, and will possibly need to be approached more than five sittings to complete, it provides an interesting insight into those discussions I remember. As well provides us all some source of insight possibly as we reflect upon our society today.

I’m certain other sub memories also come into play here that I haven’t resurrected as yet thus my intent may be confusing to those whom might read up on “Nihilism” in the following link, but truly one cannot be hurt by simply reading the posting and understanding the content.

http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/nihilism.html


53 posted on 04/26/2007 4:38:37 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: durasell

Both “Art of War” and Machiavelli are required reading for military staff officers and for politicians. So much for “neither have any real application”. Why, look at our own WJC of the stained blue dress to see the real life applications to making a political career and to the political survival. One needs not merely read the texts, of course, but to ponder and to understand them. But then again, that applies to many other texts.


54 posted on 04/26/2007 4:46:32 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: sonic109

Then be prepared for Klinton in the White House .

Better an enemy in front of me then behind me.


55 posted on 04/26/2007 4:48:52 AM PDT by THEUPMAN (####### comment deleted by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

Both are still required reading for strategy by military, though there really is no “required reading list” for pols. Perhaps there should be.

The Prince, interestingly enough, was written to curry favor with the family after the Big M made some strategic errors. Basically it’s a butt kissing book.

Durasell’s Rules for Business #121: If the guy sitting across the table from you brings up either The Art of War or The Prince, understand you’re dealing with a second rate mind. The only rational response is a triangle paper football flicked at his left eye.


56 posted on 04/26/2007 4:52:44 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Agreed!


57 posted on 04/26/2007 5:14:17 AM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonic109

Boogeyman.Dont worry, the beast will defeat herself.


58 posted on 04/26/2007 5:17:02 AM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

He certainly is not qualified to be the republican nominee.But as a rat bastard I would say YES!


59 posted on 04/26/2007 5:19:12 AM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

It is his gun grabbing ways that does it for me.


60 posted on 04/26/2007 5:19:17 AM PDT by corlorde (New Hampshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: THEUPMAN

And that! is the truth, plain and simple.


61 posted on 04/26/2007 5:45:53 AM PDT by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: airborne

What was Hunter’s stand on the Schaivo case?


62 posted on 04/26/2007 5:53:02 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: cloud8
Think about it: is President Giuliani going to force your daughter to have an abortion? Is he going to take away your precious gun? Of course not.

Seldom has so much nonsense been packed into three short sentences.

First of all, the Rockefeller Republican condescension drips from your post. Precious guns? I know you self-proclaimed Republican elites prefer to look down your nose at gun-totin' red-state rubes. However, red state rubes are the ones who put Bush in the White House. Twice. Since you live in gun-control nirvana, I can see why you can belittle gun-rights activists. You apparently don't care enough about gun rights to live in a state where you have any.

And second, President Rudy might not force daughters to have an abortion. But he'd pay for his grandaughter to have one. And use tax dollars to create a right for any woman to have an abortion, even if she can't pay for it. Such a man is completely unfit to lead the pro-life political party.

And third, I guess you've deliberately missed all the posts about Rudy's anti-gun and gun-grabbing past. But again, I guess us red-state rubes are just too unsophisticated to put Rudy's past actions aside and uncritically accept what he is telling us now that he needs our votes. Silly rubes...

63 posted on 04/26/2007 5:53:17 AM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

Wait a minute. Rudy’s understanding of the nations predicament came too late. While I blame the terrorists who flew those planes into the WTC, Rudy was not exactly pro-active regarding terrorism until after the fact. He put the emergency command center and fuel in the WTC after it had already been targeted. He made NYC a SANCTUARY CITY for illegals, therefore, LEO were prohibited from questioning anyones legality. Think about it, what a great city to live in if you aren’t supposed to be here. It has also been brought up that the radio systems the firemen were using were not up to par, imagine that in a city that size.

I am not ashamed to say that I am supporting Duncan Hunter, I can back up the fact that he is well aware of our countries predicament and has been fighting for years for the military. His voting record proves it, the fact that he served in the military and has a son that is currently serving in Iraq, he knows the cost of war. He certainly has the expertise to handle our predicament. The United States Military is not the same as the NYPD and FDNY.


64 posted on 04/26/2007 5:58:07 AM PDT by panthermom (DUNCAN HUNTER 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Rudy is pro abortion and pro gun control. Those are the two major reasons why the media is pushing him.

Republicans can do much better. republican’s great weakness is that they cannot compete in the political arena.

Republicans are, I’m sorry to say, wimps. They can only win by default.


65 posted on 04/26/2007 6:00:50 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

I’m not certain.

Perhaps his son, Sam, could find out for us.

Meanwhile, here are some of his positions that are fromhis website.

http://www.gohunter08.com/inner.asp?z=4


66 posted on 04/26/2007 6:13:24 AM PDT by airborne (Duncan Hunter is the only real choice for honest to goodness conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Duncan Hunter Ambassador

Sam, can you tell us what your dad’s position was with regards to the Terri Schiavo case?


67 posted on 04/26/2007 6:15:18 AM PDT by airborne (Duncan Hunter is the only real choice for honest to goodness conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

“Abortion opponents can ill afford to give up their leverage in the GOP. Their position has little support among the cultural elite; many in the Republican establishment would like nothing better than to ‘get beyond issues like that.’”

There’s the money quote.

The white shoes, country club Republicans just aren’t happy with us social conservatives. They’ll take our votes as long as we shut up and ride the back of the bus.

I’m not going to vote for their candidate for president.


68 posted on 04/26/2007 6:17:08 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

For later.


69 posted on 04/26/2007 6:32:25 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
It's aabsolutely crucial that FR provide a forum for the conservative alternatives to Rudy... ALL the conservative alternatives to Rudy.


70 posted on 04/26/2007 7:38:45 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Don't blame Illinois for Pelosi, we elected ROSKAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Thompson: On the Issues

" Right to Life -- Governor Thompson is strongly pro-life and signed one of the nation’s first partial-birth abortion bans. Under Thompson, the number of adoptions in Wisconsin increased by 22 percent, while the number of abortions decreased by 37 percent. Just as he did in Wisconsin, Thompson would appoint strict constructionist judges who do not legislate from the bench."

71 posted on 04/26/2007 7:47:46 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Don't blame Illinois for Pelosi, we elected ROSKAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
A nation that does not permit self protection (guns) and refuses to protect the defenseless (the unborn) lacks the moral vigor to defeat a ruthless and fanatical enemy.

I concur. If Giuliani is elected, he'll face two ruthless and fanatic enemies--one in Islamofascism, and one in the Democrat congress. If we don't have a strong majority in congress, he won't be able to get funding for the war unless he "compromises" with the Dems--meaning he'll have to give them what they want on issues like gun control, abortion, non-conservative judges, etc. And since all indications are that he's in favor of those things anyway, I can see huge inroads on our deteriorating freedoms in return for too little money for the war, effectively rendering us incapable of fighting it.

The only favorable thing about Giuliani, IMO, is his determination to fight for victory against Islamofascism. But his liberalism on all other issues would, I believe, result in his inability to carry that fight forward.

Another question, which I believe correlates to your statement, is whether God can even be assumed to be on the side of a nation that permits the slaughter of its most innocent and defenseless citizens.

72 posted on 04/26/2007 7:49:35 AM PDT by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
>>Neither. With abortion providers I have not had any contacts, and as for gay activists - the only time I got in contact with them was 18 years ago when some demonstration of theirs was passing by me and they tried to give me some of their literature. I told them that I was not interested, and that ended the conversation. I am not foaming at the mouth at the mentioning of them, though, so that must make me an activist.

You are a pretender and we've seen your kind before. They casually mention they just happened to be at "some demonstration" (even though you obviously remember the exact date, time, place, etc.) and, oh, you weren't really interested, blah, blah, blah.

You're a big phony pretender, pure and simple, who doesn't support a conservative agenda -- much more, you do support a liberal agenda including the compromise of our troops with "out and proud" homosexuals. You also BTW don't support right to life, you don't support the 2nd amendment -- even though you purport to belong to the NRA as related on your FR homepage -- given you endorse the #1 gun grabber Rudy G.

Get lost jerk. We don't need you or your ilk on this forum. Go somewhere else to spread your lies and false representations.

73 posted on 04/26/2007 7:55:16 AM PDT by vox_freedom (John 16:2 yea, the hour come, that whosoever killeth you, will think that he doth a service to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith; Cindy
Even if he's the GOP candidate?

A snowball has a better chance of getting tossed around by the Devil himself than Rudy has of EVER getting my vote. The hillery beast threat carry's no wieght with me. If the beast gets to the WH, look back on these days where you Rudybots were warned, and you'll soon realize the damage YOU inflicted on our Country. I'm not whistling Dixie here, and I will NOT join in electing a NE LIBERAL, so people like you can whistle past the graveyard of what used to be America. Some of you bots have the common sense and reason of a rock so I don't expect you to get it until it's too late, and even then, I'll have to rely on a coin toss, just to keep it real. Blackbird.

74 posted on 04/26/2007 7:56:03 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST (A vote for rudyputin IS a vote for the hildabeast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
On May 3rd we'll get to see him in debate with the Rudy McRomney's.

Oh, good. On what network will the debate be televised, do you know? Will it be Fox, I hope I hope?

75 posted on 04/26/2007 7:58:51 AM PDT by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Admin Moderator
BTW, isn't this week's "poll question" just a retreat of the exact same question FR asked a few weeks ago, i.e.:

" Looks like our true blue conservative did pretty well in our prior poll. Let's now see what happens if we nominate a social liberal who's okay with abortion, gay unions and gay rights is a gun grabber and is weak on illegal immigration. Who do you vote for in the general?
- The social liberal with the big "R"
- Third party
- Undecided/praying
- Stay home
- Hillary, et al

Incidentally, the Fred Fan Club on FR is gloating about Fred is such a "winner" because he gets 70% in a FR poll where the ONLY choices are him or Rudy on the ballot. My guess is that any "true blue conservative" would get a similar level of "support" in a hypothetical two-way race with Rudy.

Shall we test this theory? Have some FR "polls" on the following:

Rudy vs. Tommy Thompson - Pick ONE
Rudy vs. Huckabee - Pick ONE
Rudy vs. Brownback - Pick ONE
Rudy vs. Gilmore - Pick ONE
Et. al

76 posted on 04/26/2007 8:00:11 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Don't blame Illinois for Pelosi, we elected ROSKAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter
PMSnbc... (phew!)
77 posted on 04/26/2007 8:07:28 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Issue in Doubt." -Col. David Monroe Shoup, USMC 1943)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
Conservatism is already defined as a reasonably broad notion, including "social conservatives", "economic conservatives", "libertarian" and so on.

"Libertarian" = conservative? BWAH-Ha-Ha-Haaaaaaa!!!

78 posted on 04/26/2007 8:08:12 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("On 11/07/06, 'true' conservatives and 'rat traitors joined forces to bring Sharia law to America.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Oh well, at least I can get that channel. I’m sure it’s on my list somewhere. Thanks for the info!


79 posted on 04/26/2007 8:19:52 AM PDT by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Why not Rudy vs Rudy -- pick NONE.
80 posted on 04/26/2007 8:20:08 AM PDT by vox_freedom (John 16:2 yea, the hour come, that whosoever killeth you, will think that he doth a service to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter
Another question, which I believe correlates to your statement, is whether God can even be assumed to be on the side of a nation that permits the slaughter of its most innocent and defenseless citizens.

Gulp. Now there is a big ol' elephant in the living room right there!

It is very difficult to even bring that up, due to the Phelps cultists.

But, the facts of the matter and history are inconvenient things. Lord have mercy.

81 posted on 04/26/2007 8:23:45 AM PDT by don-o (Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom

Take it easy. The same thing could have happened to you or anyone else if you didn’t know such an obscene event were taking place. Do you keep track of all the gay activists in your area so you can avoid them? What would you have done in Gslob’s situation when someone like that approaches you?


82 posted on 04/26/2007 9:05:59 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

> Precious guns? I know you self-proclaimed Republican elites prefer to look down your nose at gun-totin’ red-state rubes.

Giuliani said w/r guns “What works in New York won’t work in Texas.” So go down to the swamp and fire off a few rounds, redneck. I’m off for the country club.


83 posted on 04/26/2007 9:14:07 AM PDT by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: cloud8
Giuliani said w/r guns “What works in New York won’t work in Texas.”

Funny, I missed that part of the 2nd Amendment that has state-by-state exemptions.

And beyond that, Rudy called for FEDERAL gun control laws to override state laws.

So you're claim that gun owners have nothing to fear from Rudy has been discredited.

Another recycled Rudy zombie talking point done in again.

84 posted on 04/26/2007 9:21:43 AM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: doc30
I'm saying he's a fraud when it comes to conservatism. And listed several issues including his position on homosexuals in foxholes.
What's it to you anyway? Are you his keeper?
85 posted on 04/26/2007 9:24:58 AM PDT by vox_freedom (John 16:2 yea, the hour come, that whosoever killeth you, will think that he doth a service to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

And why “bwa-ha-ha?” Contemporary collectivists of all stripes are characterized by their love of the big government [provided they are in command, of course], and classic liberal [in Friedrich von Hayek’s usage] tradition, with ist libertarian overtones - most surely looks and feels conservative in comparison.


86 posted on 04/26/2007 9:53:52 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: cloud8
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Yeah, Giuliani is not for federal gun bans, no sireee...

87 posted on 04/26/2007 9:55:00 AM PDT by vox_freedom (John 16:2 yea, the hour come, that whosoever killeth you, will think that he doth a service to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom
What's it to you anyway?

You just seem very agitated and it's showing in your recent posts. I've never seen so much anger on FR like I have this week and it bothers me as a Christian. It's like no one wants to discuss things, but just get upset when there is disagreement.

88 posted on 04/26/2007 10:27:14 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: doc30
I've never seen so much anger on FR like I have this week and it bothers me as a Christian.

What bothers me, as a Christian, is pretenders who support abortion, homosexual "rights" and removal 2nd Amendment freedoms. Further they defend and support a guy like Giuliani who is wrong on each of these critically important issues. Asking that there be compromise on these issues is just plain wrong. BTW, I wouldn't call it "anger" or being "upset" just serious disagreement on matters of moral values and freedoms.

In case you haven't noticed, that is what FR is about and those that want to subjugate these opinions to "discussion" or compromise should and will be held accountable.

For example is the matter of Giuliani and gun control. He has been on record regarding this issue (in his speeches and graphically in the above picture along with his friend Chuckie Schumer). Yet some here deny that he wants to do anything but allow states to regulate/restrict gun ownership and use. Well now, we have a disagreement on this issue don't we? So we stand up and state our opinion about it. Why? because it is important to us, our families, our sons and daughters and our future.

89 posted on 04/26/2007 10:44:55 AM PDT by vox_freedom (John 16:2 yea, the hour come, that whosoever killeth you, will think that he doth a service to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: panthermom

Exactly my point, it isn’t all about abortion and 2nd amendment. The Sanctuary City thing is more than enough for me. If Rudy doesn’t care about enforcing immigration laws in NYC, why would he care to do so in the rest of the USA? Rudy would be good in the GWOT? Tough talk to the enemy at the front door, while your enemy sneaks in the back door, somehow doesn’t seem so secure to me.


90 posted on 04/26/2007 1:07:17 PM PDT by WildcatClan (Just wait till the Pretendicans have to debate, Hunter in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Great idea and that poll is bogus anyway as if those are our only choices. I would like to see a straight up poll with all Republican candidates, sans those who aren’t even running. It would really be interesting to see how Freepers would vote as things stand now.


91 posted on 04/26/2007 1:17:47 PM PDT by WildcatClan (Just wait till the Pretendicans have to debate, Hunter in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
The fact that -- by your own admission, mind -- you are incapable of discerning the baseline, fundamental difference between a pro-infanticide, pro-"gay rights" party platform and one adhering to traditional conservative principles serves as concrete evidence that you are, demonstrably, staggeringly ill-equipped to contribute meaningfully to any such discussion on this forum.

You are, however, in the right place to actually learn quite a bit more on said topic than you (evidently) do at present, should you genuinely desire to avail yourself of the opportunity. Whether you actually elect to do so is, ultimately, no one's responsibility but your own.

92 posted on 04/26/2007 1:43:42 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("On 11/07/06, 'true' conservatives and 'rat traitors joined forces to bring Sharia law to America.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I do not share your concerns, and consider them as counterproductive.


93 posted on 04/26/2007 2:01:22 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: durasell
I’d give it up on the rudy thing. He doesn’t stand a chance and really isn’t qualified.

How is he not qualified?

94 posted on 04/26/2007 2:16:26 PM PDT by A Longer Name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: WildcatClan; Jim Robinson; John Robinson; Admin Moderator
"I would like to see a straight up poll with all Republican candidates, sans those who aren’t even running. It would really be interesting to see how Freepers would vote as things stand now."

I have been saying this for weeks. C'mon, JimRob, if you are REALLY serious about letting the "anti-Rudy" voters here have a voice, LET US tell you WHICH candidates we prefer. Don't try to engineer a hypothetical "Fred vs. Rudy" victory until such candidates are actually running against each other. Might as well ask whether freepers would vote for Ronald Reagan over Karl Marx.

You want what kind of competition Rudy has? ASK.

A simple FR poll is in order:

====================================================

Here is a list of all the Republicans CURRENTLY running for President. If the election was held today, which of these would you vote for?

Former Governor Tommy Thompson (R-Wisconsin)
Former Governor Mitt Romney (R-Massachusetts)
Former Governor Mike Huckabee (R-Arkansas)
Former Governor Jim Gilmore (R-Virginia)
Former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani (R-New York)
US Senator Sam Brownback (R-Kansas)
US Senator John McCain (R-Arizona)
Congressman Duncan Hunter (R-California)
Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas)
Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-Colorado)
Stay Home/Pass

================================================

THOSE are the cards we're currently being dealt. We can talk hypothetically all day if 92% of freepers would choose Condi Rice or Newt Gingrich or George Allen (anyone member last year when we were told HE was the savior of the GOP and anyone here who thought otherwise was ignorant??) or "Fred" over "Rudy" but it won't accomplish a damn thing unless those candidates actually RUN.

95 posted on 04/26/2007 2:24:17 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Don't blame Illinois for Pelosi, we elected ROSKAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Jim, there is no movement. I am disheartened by the lack of commitment or knowledge to what the CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT IS...

They just past what is practically SAME SEX MARRIAGE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE... Where is the movement? Where is the voice of the conservative? I say it is lame, speechless. Why? because the Media has successfully won the mind of many who dare to even think for themselves. Sit back, get fat and enjoy the ride.....EVERYTHING YOU HAVE STOOD FOR WILL BE TAKEN. I SAY EVEN YOUR BIBLE, YOUR RIGHTS TO YOUR CHILDREN,YOUR RIGHT TO SPEECH. Your grandchildren will not know your God and will curse you. This is the price of conforming to this world.

96 posted on 04/26/2007 2:29:24 PM PDT by Texas4ever (Anything off the dollar menu :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
"I would like to see a straight up poll with all Republican candidates, sans those who aren’t even running

I bet you would, since Fred is sucking more oxygen away from Rudy with each passing day.

97 posted on 04/26/2007 2:31:08 PM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Yeah, yeah, yeah, Fred and Rudy are our ONLY choices. Anyone here not for your hero Fred MUST be a “Rudy McRomney” supporter, right? We have a dozen people running on the GOP side but the only “real” candidate is a guy who sits on his ass for monthes and refuses to say if he’ll run. Get your head out of your @$$ and realize that you can’t dictate to us who the candidates are.

$100 bucks says most of you guys in the Cult of Fred are the ones who spent all of 2006 telling us George Allen WILL BE our candidate for President. Your last imaginary presidential candidate worked out sooooo well, didn’t he?


98 posted on 04/26/2007 2:38:44 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Don't blame Illinois for Pelosi, we elected ROSKAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Hey, blowhard, there already was a poll similar to what you are demanding

http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/poll?poll=170;results=1

99 posted on 04/26/2007 2:42:46 PM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Oh, and blowhard, there was this poll as well - Fred and all the other candidates, declared and possible:

http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/poll?poll=177;results=1

So before you whine about how unfair FR is, perhaps you could examine past polls, eh?

100 posted on 04/26/2007 2:45:16 PM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson