Yay! :)
1 posted on
05/08/2007 10:05:20 AM PDT by
ozoneliar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: ozoneliar
2 posted on
05/08/2007 10:07:33 AM PDT by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: ozoneliar
Where does the appeal process go after this?
To: ozoneliar
Double tap bump! Great news!
4 posted on
05/08/2007 10:09:24 AM PDT by
beltfed308
(Rudy: When you absolutely,positively need a liberal for President.)
To: ozoneliar
Double tap bump! Great news!
5 posted on
05/08/2007 10:09:37 AM PDT by
beltfed308
(Rudy: When you absolutely,positively need a liberal for President.)
To: ozoneliar
This is well done.
As it stands now, only criminals and cops have handguns in DC. So, if you’re a law-abiding citizen in the nation’s capital, and someone is trying to break into your house, you get to call the cops. And, IF the cops can find your house(no joke), they might get there just in time to help the EMTs load your body into a bag.
The Circuit Court’s decision is driving the DC City Council bonkers. It simply cannot understand how a handgun can SAVE a life.
Council members need to get out more.
6 posted on
05/08/2007 10:10:25 AM PDT by
RexBeach
(Americans never quit. -Douglas MacArthur)
To: Joe Brower
14 posted on
05/08/2007 10:20:41 AM PDT by
EdReform
(The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF *GOA*SAS)
To: ozoneliar
Right on! Now let’s get this to the SC. Sooner than later.
15 posted on
05/08/2007 10:25:53 AM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there)
To: ozoneliar
aaaaaaaah, too bad....BWAA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
16 posted on
05/08/2007 10:27:47 AM PDT by
NurdlyPeon
(Thompson / Hunter in 2008)
To: ozoneliar
While this is great, I don’t think it matters if this goes to SCOTUS or not. Can’t they just re-write the law to be more like NYC’s? Couldn’t they still write a law so restrictive that virtually no “regular people” can still possess a gun?
To: ozoneliar
w00t!
Now let's hope these idiots are just smart enough to press the issue for the SCOTUS to hear.
24 posted on
05/08/2007 11:00:26 AM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: ozoneliar
Do not get tooo excited, denial of en banc is very routine.
Same for motion for rehearings or motions for summary judgement.
It is just a matter of routine to eliminate all avenues and open the appeal doors.
In fact this is more an appeal set up so don’t celebrate. DC municipals are going to appeal this.
27 posted on
05/08/2007 11:07:39 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: ozoneliar
Hehehehe. Two out of three Circuit Courts agree on the definition of the 2nd Admendment. IMHO that is a majority. Only the much overturned Ninth Court is in the minority.
The 2nd admendment question needs to be asked of the Al-dimocRATS that are running for president. That would be to tough of a question.
To: ozoneliar
32 posted on
05/08/2007 11:29:21 AM PDT by
RetiredArmy
(America has lost its mind and is on its last days as a free country & Republic.)
To: ozoneliar
Is there a better source to this?
33 posted on
05/08/2007 11:32:03 AM PDT by
Hazcat
(Live to party, work to afford it.)
To: ozoneliar
36 posted on
05/08/2007 11:42:14 AM PDT by
American Quilter
(You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
To: ozoneliar
On to the Supreme court then! This will be a history making case either way. Where does Kennedy stand on the 2nd?
40 posted on
05/08/2007 12:06:12 PM PDT by
saganite
(Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
To: ozoneliar
The city will probably appeal to the Supreme Court but their own attorney will tell them if they can't get an en banc hearing, odds are good the SCOTUS will probably uphold
Parker. Its a bad day for DC Democrat Thug Adrian Fenty and a good day for DC's law-abiding residents.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
45 posted on
05/08/2007 12:37:13 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: ozoneliar
Ginsburg should have been on the Supreme Court...Its a shame he pulled out and we ended up with Kennedy.
To: ozoneliar
They did this - because it’s right to do so.
50 posted on
05/08/2007 1:07:57 PM PDT by
kinsman redeemer
(The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
56 posted on
05/08/2007 1:48:18 PM PDT by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
