Based on the above score, you are a Hard-Core Conservative . (also: Tancredo, Hunter, Brownback, in that order)
Must say, I'm kinda proud. ;-)
Posted on 05/10/2007 8:06:48 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32
Hunter, Tancredo, Brownback. But I’d vote for Thompson in a heartbeat.
Hunter
Tancredo
Romney
1,2,3
I would least vote for Sharpton 8%, Kucinich 8%, and Clinton 10%.
I agree with the results completely, good quiz. :O)
Choose “2008 withdrawals and unannounced” and take the quiz again to include Thompson. Frist is included as well.
Choose “2008 withdrawals and unannounced” and take the quiz again to include Thompson. Frist is included as well.
Top Three for Me: Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo, Sam Brownback. Hmmm.
Good observations. Additionally, leadership ability and perception of same are not factored into this exercise. Even if the questions weren’t deficient, matching up position points is but partial measure and ignores the significant role of intangibles. Intelligent candidate selection demands both.
Would you tell me how you posted that? I haven’t found how to do it in the HTML Sandbox.
In Firefox, you drag over text, photos, etc. on a web page and highlight what you want to capture, and then right-click and choose “View Selection Source” - then right-click the code that’s highlighted and choose “Copy”; then just paste it all (text and code) into FR. Hit “Post” and you’re done.
In some cases, the (candidates) photos won’t show up, as was the case here.
What browser do you use? If you use IE I can probably tell you how to do it in that as well.
I'll go further - the methodology is garbage (take a look some of the other position categories and the votes used to derive the position - it is a joke). And some of the very definitions of what 'libertarian' means are preposterous. Whoever wrote the quiz has been drinking the left-wing ACLU liberaltarian "positive rights" koolaid.
I would like to see a longer quiz asking if we support or oppose each of the individual votes used to derive these scores (many of which have nothing to do with the stated category they are under, or are outright misleading).
(That said, I came up with Hunter and Tancredo at the top, and Kucinich and Sharpton at the bottom)
Excellent point. There's much more to the President than his position on legislation. In fact, one might say that how a President would vote on this-or-that isn't all that important, since he's not going to be voting!
Tied for first: Hunter, Brownback.
Tied for last: Kucinich, Sharpton.
40% for Hunter or Tancredo.. ironically because of economic agreement. No candidate agrees with me on even half of the issues but I guess that’s what I get for being a “Conservative-Leaning Libertarian.”
Is Fred Thomson on the list?
Who is on the score list?
Top 3: Brownback, Hunter, Tancredo
Bottom 3: Sharpton, Kucinich, Clinton
Not too many surprises there!
Tancredo, Hunter, Romney
We’ll see if it stays that way.
Based on the above score, you are a Hard-Core Conservative . (also: Tancredo, Hunter, Brownback, in that order)
Must say, I'm kinda proud. ;-)
No FRED THOMPSON.... his cousin TOMMY is there though.
Hunter, Tancredo, Brownback. I could live with that.Presently I lean towards my ex-gov Gilmore. My philospohy was “hard-core conservative” - duh!
What shocked me is that I have something in common with the lib candidates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.