Posted on 05/16/2007 5:29:56 AM PDT by tcostell
He definitely would siphon off votes from Hillary.
The Dem version of Ross Perot!
Gore, or Bloomberg?
What can I say, I have no real excuse other than that I'm a math guy.
They’re all creeps.
You might want to reread it. It’s highlighting Bloomie’s more glaring shortcomings. It’s one of those endorsements along the lines of “RUN AL, RUN!”
That answers that one. Calling off the Viking Kitties (after we ROFL at Boomberg).
Virginia just passed a law making it illegal for N.Y. investigators to conduct investigations in Virginia and the VA Attorney General has provided written notice to N.Y. that violators will be prosecuted.
Bloomberg as a third party leftist will take a whole lotta votes from the libs. Which is what the poster is implying.Which is very good for Us :)
Don’t quit your day job, dude.
among other places. . .
Am assuming this is done with tongue in cheek
Whatever the case; good points scored against Bloomberg. The news as of late that New Yorker's think he is a better mayor than Rudy, did leave me wondering if this was not more than a bit of Demrat spin designed to interfere with Rudy's numbers. . .
Not only that...
"They were originally enacted to keep guns away from those feckless Irish immigrants less they begin to demand things of their government that their government was uninterested in delivering."
Lest they begin to demand things...
Tcostell lists three "obviou's" reasons why someone (it isn't clear who) should or should not support Mike Bloomberg:
-his personality
-he banned transfats
-he's for gun control.
You'll have to do better than that.
The truth is, it was only inspired by one of the other posts where people who didn't know Bloomberg very well seemed open to his idea of a candidacy. I thought about it a bit and decided that I liked the idea, but for very different reasons.
Hey, considereing the doozies I post I’ve got no room to criticize. I really DO think that if you got someone to proofread it for you and fix it a little, it could be published as a tongue-in-cheeck op-ed.
LOL. Excellent. Amusing and intelligent. We don’t see that too often at FR. You should write more. Ping me if you do.
As a Texan, I have always viewed most Northurn' politicians very suspiciously--but this Bloomberg guy has seemed more suspect than most to me. That is because of his hideous record on the 2A,
Not long ago, word got out that the "honorable" mayor and a band of a few other mayors from around the country were going to hold this big press conference in DC. A few Second Amendment Sisters, a contingent from the Virginia Citizen's Defense League, and some DC freepers decided to show up and "share our views" with the good governor.
The strangest thing happened...Apparently the Goonberg heard that we were there--so he moved his "news conference"-----I heard that he moved it several times.
I know that we never found him--but mission accomplished, as he never got much attention when he finally found a place to give it. Apparently nobody cared, because he drew very little attention from it.
I've also taken heart in the fact that several of his allied cities have backed away from him, too.
I think you did a great job of capturing the essence of this guy. I also think you should publish it after a bit of editing.
Thanks for the compliment. I’m pleased someone was able to get past my awful spelling and grammar.
Actually, the SULLIVAN Laws were passed by the Irish-American head of the New York State Assembly, because he didn't want those "gangsters and revolutionaries" to be armed.
Other than that, great article!
There were errors? lol,I enjoyed the humor,the amusing sentence structure and obvious knowledge about this man that I didn’t even notice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.