Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thompson and the 'Laziness' Issue (MSM Bias Alert)
Newsweek ^ | June 2, 2007 | Holly Bailey

Posted on 06/02/2007 4:22:57 PM PDT by Zakeet

Does Fred Thompson have what it takes to be president? The former senator turned "Law & Order" actor, who launched an exploratory committee last week, has been dogged by rumors that he doesn't have the work ethic for a long campaign. "The book on him is he's lazy," David Keene, president of the American Conservative Union, said last week. The criticism seems fed by Thompson's time in the Senate, where he maintained a less rigorous schedule than his colleagues and was known to duck out of late-night debates. Of the 90 bills he introduced during his eight years in the Senate, only four became law.

Thompson has never denied being irritated with the pace of Senate life and cited it as one of the reasons he opted out of a 2002 re-election bid. "I don't like spending 14- and 16-hour days voting on 'sense of the Senate' resolutions on irrelevant matters," he said in 1998. "There are some important things we really need to get on with—and on a daily basis, it's very frustrating." His 2008 competitors have privately questioned his endurance, with one rival consultant (anonymous so as not to reflect badly on his own man) telling NEWSWEEK, "I doubt he has the fire in the belly to compete."

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008election; acu; fredthompson; mediabias; msm; newsweak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: WorkingClassFilth
If only we could elect a Congress that would be the same

We already have enough laws. We only need to enforce what we have now. Congress only needs to deal with maintenance.

21 posted on 06/02/2007 5:05:44 PM PDT by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
"I don't like spending 14- and 16-hour days voting on 'sense of the Senate' resolutions on irrelevant matters," he said in 1998. "There are some important things we really need to get on with—and on a daily basis, it's very frustrating."

This makes him lazy??? LOLOLOL!

22 posted on 06/02/2007 5:07:32 PM PDT by tiredoflaundry (The greatest danger to our troops is the Congress of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry
The criticism seems fed by Thompson's time in the Senate, where he maintained a less rigorous schedule than his colleagues and was known to duck out of late-night debates.

IOW , do not waste his time with pissin' contests!

23 posted on 06/02/2007 5:09:58 PM PDT by tiredoflaundry (The greatest danger to our troops is the Congress of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
"I don't like spending 14- and 16-hour days voting on 'sense of the Senate' resolutions on irrelevant matters," he said in 1998. "There are some important things we really need to get on with—and on a daily basis, it's very frustrating."
Doesn't sound lazy to me. Sounds intelligent. Doesn't want to sit around in elitist circle-jerks. Too smart for that.
24 posted on 06/02/2007 5:10:01 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry
"I don't like spending 14- and 16-hour days voting on 'sense of the Senate' resolutions on irrelevant matters," he said in 1998. "There are some important things we really need to get on with—and on a daily basis, it's very frustrating."

Can you imagine having to listen to Byrd and Kennedy and the rest of the gasbags pontificating for hours on meaningless drivel, and obviously socialist claptrap? I know I couldn't take it, I can't handle 30 minutes of CNN without throwing in the towel.

25 posted on 06/02/2007 5:12:42 PM PDT by RobFromGa (FDT/TBD in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: oyez
Repeal of useless, onerous and anti-Constitutional laws would be helpful as well.
26 posted on 06/02/2007 5:13:13 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Current tagline banned under hate speech laws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
LOL! I have on occasion! They do love to hear thier own voice!
27 posted on 06/02/2007 5:15:44 PM PDT by tiredoflaundry (The greatest danger to our troops is the Congress of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

AMEN, BROTHER — AMEN!

As Mr. Jefferson declared, “That government that governs least governs best.”

And as far as his legislative record goes, fewer bills equates to less interference in our lives.


28 posted on 06/02/2007 5:23:44 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Take care of defense and facilitate commerce among the states. Beyond that, they’re writing their own ticket.


29 posted on 06/02/2007 5:27:37 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Current tagline banned under hate speech laws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The Founding Fathers envisioned a part-time legislature of men who brought talents from many fields of endeavor to the task, came together at infrequent intervals, got the job done, and went back to their private enterprises.

If Fred got tired of the egotistical blowhards in the Senate who are in love with sound of their own voices and think that federal legislation is the only solution to every conceivable human problem, that speaks well of him.


30 posted on 06/02/2007 5:36:33 PM PDT by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet; Politicalmom
Of the 90 bills he introduced during his eight years in the Senate, only four became law.

Total spin. That has nothing to do with Thompson...it would be true whether he were in the Senate or not. The vast majority of all bills introduced into Congress are never passed into laws.

31 posted on 06/02/2007 5:45:57 PM PDT by pcottraux (Fred Thompson pronounces it "P. Coe-troe"...in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I don’t think the MSM appreciates just how lame this attack really is.

For one thing — the rigors of campaigning will support or refute it in a big hurry.

If this is all they have on Fred... they’re going to have to return a big chunk of that bag money to the DNC.


32 posted on 06/02/2007 5:48:18 PM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

If you want a job done efficiently and economically give it to the laziest person in the room...


33 posted on 06/02/2007 6:05:47 PM PDT by Wil H (In 1492 the overwhelming "Concensus" was that the World was flat - so it's not open to debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1
“talking points”

scratch gravitas, go with lazitas

34 posted on 06/02/2007 6:09:29 PM PDT by Tail Gunner John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Gee, he hasn’t even declared and they are already afraid of him. This is very good! I think I really like him. We don’t need any new laws, what we need are the enforcement of the laws we have and the repeal of a bunch of unconstitutional ones. Since governments never repeal laws I’ll be happy to settle for no new ones! Go Fred and remember to take long naps, it’ll drive them nuts.
35 posted on 06/02/2007 6:16:39 PM PDT by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oyez

i think they should set a maximum limit on the number of laws (the total number; not how many new ones they can add).
then, if congress wants to add a new one, they have to eliminate an old one.
the maxlimit should be set at about half of what we have now.
congress could then focus on figuring out which laws to eliminate until they get it down to the max allowable.
they would have to delete 25% of the surplus laws each year, until they get it down to the maxlimit.
if they fail to delete enough in any single year, laws would be deleted at random.
this would solve most problems in this country.


36 posted on 06/02/2007 6:17:53 PM PDT by drhogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
"I don't like spending 14- and 16-hour days voting on 'sense of the Senate' resolutions on irrelevant matters," he said in 1998. "There are some important things we really need to get on with—and on a daily basis, it's very frustrating."

Well, I hope a LOT of taxpayers hear that quote - it ought to raise his poll numbers significantly!

37 posted on 06/02/2007 6:48:22 PM PDT by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
" Of the 90 bills he introduced during his eight years in the Senate, only four became law."

How many of HRC's or Obama's became law?

38 posted on 06/02/2007 6:49:36 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette
If Fred is “lazy” like Reagan, he has my support

My sentiments exactly.

39 posted on 06/02/2007 6:57:52 PM PDT by Free State Four
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #40 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson