Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Tries to Save Immigration Bill
Time Magazine ^ | Jun. 11, 2007 | Gilbert Cruz

Posted on 06/11/2007 4:10:39 PM PDT by Baladas

It's indicative of how very badly President Bush needs a victory — any victory — that he plans to make a rare trip to Capitol Hill Tuesday afternoon to attend a weekly Republican luncheon. There, he will make a personal appeal to senators on behalf of his bipartisan immigration reform bill, the progress of which came to a sudden and surprising halt late Thursday night after a failed attempt to bring the legislation to a vote.

While Bush has previously leaned on Vice President Cheney to make these kinds of congressional entreaties (the President last sat in on a Senate policy lunch in 2002), either Bush's desperation or the VP's lack of enthusiasm for the measure — or quite possibly both — has forced his hand.

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; bush; bushlegacy; deathofthegop; georgebush; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; presidentbush; scaretactics; smokeybackroom; vampirebill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: 3D-JOY

I wasn’t sure what you meant till I went to his web site and read his opinion on Kennedy\McCain,now I get the LOL reference !!!


41 posted on 06/11/2007 4:57:19 PM PDT by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Looks like our president has ruled out doing anything militarily about Iran in the next 18 months. He isn’t going to have any possibility of recovering political capital with this latest move.


42 posted on 06/11/2007 4:58:01 PM PDT by Menehune56 (Oderint Dum Metuant (Let them hate, so long as they fear - Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
He knows his popularity is at about the sewer level...so I think he’s just figures he’s gonna burn the house down after he walks away.

Oh! so true, no one in their right mind would vote for another bush, so the hell with everyone.

43 posted on 06/11/2007 5:00:52 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Well I’d say he’s doing a good job of it...


44 posted on 06/11/2007 5:01:36 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Obie Wan

I can’t bear to look...he is head of the RNC too. That is where we are attacking the contributions...none given and for this reason. They let the callers at headquarters go this week...they must have gotten the message!


45 posted on 06/11/2007 5:02:52 PM PDT by 3D-JOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon
To try and tell people this ANMESTY bill is not AMNESTY, is just silly on it’s face, and a bald face lie in fact.

Last fall he had a news conference when he signed the fence bill.

Wheres the damn fence Jorge? His little lies are growing lies.

46 posted on 06/11/2007 5:03:59 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
My two Senators Inhofe and Coburn are totally opposed to this bill.

I've asked this question several times on FR, and have yet to get any sort of answer at all, so I'll ask you, PhiKapMom: Why did Tom Coburn abstain from voting on the Cornyn Amendment?

47 posted on 06/11/2007 5:04:14 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

He should have fought this hard for SS reform. Or anything else that would be for the good of this country.

He’s been too cozy with that mess that passes itself off as a country since he started.


48 posted on 06/11/2007 5:25:05 PM PDT by Duke Nukum (The World is Not Enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

This is not over yet. Bush refuses to give up this easily. It's his stuborn character. He will try to resurect it and call it something else. We have to keep our guard up. We need to keep the pressure up.

STAGE TWO is to go after the people who hire illegals. Start giving them fines and arresting them. Just catch ten or 100 of them on the nightly news. The magnet will dry up and most of the 12 million will go home by themselves.

As an adendum, we should anonymously call the IRS, people working "off the books" means taxes ain't being paid. Make anonymous fliers and hang them around the neighborhood, name names. It's time to embarras these bustards, whether they give to the GOP or Rats, we don't need them.

STOP AMNESTY NOW!! WE CAN DO IT!!

CALL! CALL! CALL! CALL! AND KEEP CALLING TILL THE LINES FRY!

WRITE! WRITE! WRITE! WRITE! TILL YOU RUN OUT OF INK IN YOUR PEN!

Bombard the Democrats as well, especially the ones that ran on an anti illegal immigration plank and the ones in marginal districts who could be vulnerable. keep pounding on them. This is a bipartisan issue not a Conservative or Liberal issue BUT AN AMERICAN issue.

49 posted on 06/11/2007 5:25:53 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
... Crickets.

Again.

The only thing I've found is that a staffer claimed Coburn had a speaking engagement. A speaking engagement. More important than defeating this bill? More important than voting yea on Cornyn's amendment, which would have removed convicted felons from consideration for this de facto amnesty? I admired Tom Coburn enough to have mentioned his name several times, as a potential presidential candidate. But, this lapse disturbs me greatly.

50 posted on 06/11/2007 5:27:01 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: School of Rational Thought

“Bush may be self-medicating again.”

I had the same thought. His insulting comments in Bulgaria—said in his crudest Texas drawl—suggested to me the behavior of a belligerent drunk spoiling for a fight. He was known for behaving that way when he was drunk—insulting people in restaurants, for example. Now he’s insulting Republicans who don’t agree with him. He told Tom Tancredo that he wouldn’t be able to darken the door of the White House ever again. Maybe Republicans in the House and Senate can put together an impeachment resolution that will prevent Bush from darkening the White House door again.

By the way, Harry Reid is referring to the illegals as “undocumented Americans” who should be brought out of the shadows. And Bush wants to deal with him and Kennedy and Salazar? He knifes his Republican base and throws in with the sleaziest Democrats in the Senate.


51 posted on 06/11/2007 5:30:03 PM PDT by WestSylvanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

52 posted on 06/11/2007 5:43:12 PM PDT by LFOD777 (In 2006, Washington spent $2.7 Trillion and ran a $248 billion budget deficit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

More like ‘freedom fajitos’ the way he is going nowadays.

His rationale? “I just want to reward the Hectors and Hectoritas for doing the jobs you racist bigots won’t do.”

The real deal behind this is that the globalist minded politicians don’t want a fence as it will throw a wrench into merging the US, Canada and Mexico into an unholy (and illegal) United Americas.


53 posted on 06/11/2007 5:49:15 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WestSylvanian
Bush swore to uphold and protect the constitution. That's his job and he hasn't done it. Bush's whining that he can't do this unless a "comprehensive" plan is fashioned for dealing with the invasion of our southern borders is incomprehensible. Bush is a traitor and his legacy will be harsh. Consider if Al Qaeda walks across the border and nukes a US city? All of those heads will be on Bush, Chertoff, and the whole Republican country club.

Cromwell will have fared the better in that case.

54 posted on 06/11/2007 5:54:56 PM PDT by kcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
The real deal behind this is that the globalist minded politicians don’t want a fence as it will throw a wrench into merging the US, Canada and Mexico into an unholy (and illegal) United Americas.

I see you have been doing your job, must be how you picked your screen name LOL.

I wholeheartedly agree. That IS why there will be no fence. That IS why there is no fence and the National Guard is now gone.

Bush wanted to make sure even more would cross to get in on the National tit.

55 posted on 06/11/2007 5:57:15 PM PDT by dforest (Fighting the new liberal Conservatism. The Left foot in the GOP door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
Today’s headlines regarding this story went from:

“Bush Confident Immigration Bill Will Pass”

to

“Bush Tries To Save Immigration Bill”

in about 9 hours!

Tomorrow’s headlines:

“Bush Shocked By Senators’ Rebuff”

followed by:

"Bush Despondent Over Barney’s Rejection Of Immigration Bill" -

56 posted on 06/11/2007 6:06:02 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Last fall he had a news conference when he signed the fence bill.

IIRC, he was going to sign the bill without ANY media present at all. Eventually, he was persuaded to sign the bill with the cameras rolling and to make a brief statement. I remember thinking at the time that he looked like it pained him to sign the bill.

The fence isn't there because Bush does not want a fence built.

I call the White House daily and record one of my objections to the bill. I do it politely.

I know it won't change his mind, but I want him to know that this bill isn't fooling Americans.
57 posted on 06/11/2007 6:16:01 PM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kcar
Bush swore to uphold and protect the constitution. That's his job and he hasn't done it. Bush's whining that he can't do this unless a "comprehensive" plan is fashioned for dealing with the invasion of our southern borders is incomprehensible. Bush is a traitor and his legacy will be harsh.

But you see, all that is not important. Bush has a higher calling and responsibility. As with the jihadists, he believes it's proper, effective and good strategy to lie to the American people about his loyalty to the Constitution and the American public, since he has a supreme vision of a new North American Superstate, currently referred to in government NewSpeak as "The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" (http://www.spp.gov), composed of Mexico, Canada and the US. We should not question his goals nor his methods since, after all, he knows what is best and he is the "Decider".

Sure, implementing all this will be nasty, brutal and murderously chaotic for the citizens of this nation, but not to worry, he has a new 98,000 acre ranch in Paraguay where he and his elitist ilk can ride it all out. The man does think ahead.

58 posted on 06/11/2007 6:26:14 PM PDT by guitfiddlist (When the 'Rats break out switchblades, it's no time to invoke Robert's Rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: guitfiddlist

Alcoa or Reynold’s?


59 posted on 06/11/2007 6:35:46 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
Alcoa or Reynold’s?

Read it for yourself. Sure, I didn't believe any of this either - before Bush demonstrated a suicidal urge to destroy the basic fabric of this nation - and for what purpose? None of the other motives make any sense - but this one does, to an insulated elitist. In any case, you will be hearing more about the SPP as the snickers die down and our "leaders" start openly referring to and defending the concept.

"Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) was launched in March of 2005 as a trilateral effort to increase security and enhance prosperity among the United States, Canada and Mexico through greater cooperation and information sharing.

This trilateral initiative is premised on our security and our economic prosperity being mutually reinforcing. The SPP recognizes that our three great nations are bound by a shared belief in freedom, economic opportunity, and strong democratic institutions.

The SPP provides the framework to ensure that North America is the safest and best place to live and do business. It includes ambitious security and prosperity programs to keep our borders closed to terrorism yet open to trade.

The SPP builds upon, but is separate from, our long-standing trade and economic relationships. It energizes other aspects of our cooperative relations, such as the protection of our environment, our food supply, and our public health.

Looking forward, President Bush, Prime Minister Harper and President Fox have identified emergency management; influenza pandemics, including avian influenza; energy security; and safe and secure gateways (border security and facilitation) as key priorities for the SPP. The Leaders also announced the creation of North American Competitiveness Council to fully incorporate the private sector into the SPP process." (more at http://www.spp.gov/)

60 posted on 06/11/2007 6:43:17 PM PDT by guitfiddlist (When the 'Rats break out switchblades, it's no time to invoke Robert's Rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson