FBI's Mueller: Al-Qaida Has Intent to Use Nuclear Weapons [Important]

NewsMax ^ | June 11, 2007

[smoketree]

Agreed.
Then we go after the next “leader” without hesitation wherever he is.
If he is in a heavily populated tribal area then we bomb the hell out of them until they either give him up or die. hopefully disrupting any and all communication networks they have and totally deny them any time or place to plan and carry out any attempts to hurt us again.
Whatever we have to do to avoid losing one or more cities to this backwards evil death cult.

[JasonC]

A rather vacuous article. About all he said is "let's Interpol". But of course there are entire countries that want nuclear terrorism to succeed, and refusal to face that fact is close to the heart of the problem.

About the only actual news in the article is the 6 ships from India story. (And radioactive waste came out of India how? And went to NYC why? But those are quibbles).

[RockinRight]

If that happened, I’d say nuke every Middle Eastern city, one by one, until they ‘fess up and turn in the people responsible.

[sheik yerbouty]

“WWJBD?” of couse!

[Sir Clean Plate Club]

"And what would you know about that, Mr. Newbie?

Is your allegiance to the Constitution, or is it to one man?

I'll tell you what is sick, and it's the herd mentality of the kneepad wearing BushBots who would defend his flawed policies no matter how detrimental they are to the national security of the United States.

Take a look in the mirror, that picture is you."

---

I have eyes and a good brain, Mr. Oldbie. And they tell me what you haters are. That's what I know.

You're no different at all than the rest of the BDS sufferers on the US Left, in Europe/Canada, the MSM, the UN, etc, etc.

One little twist from you guys: It's Bush's immigration fault! Bush is reading "My Immigrant Goat! He is! It's TRUE!!!!"

Weak egos with "BushBot" and "kneepad" vocabularies. This is a thread about nuclear threats and you BDSers need to hijack it to be about yourselves.

W is wrong on this issue. Building big fences and "rounding them up and shipping them home" are what I want. Neither action will deter a terrorist, however.

Neither will obsessive self indulgence, that's another thing I know.

LOL @ "ALL". Did you say something so profound it has to be widely disseminated? Or is it more likely that you're weak and scared of being alone?

Take a look at Cindy Shehan's medical chart. That patient is you.

[mkjessup]

Well, well, well, Mr. "Sir Clean Plate Club" (whatever that's supposed to mean), what you're overlooking is that first of all, I'm no Bush-hater, I voted for that now-revealed RINO three times, and I have supported him in every way I know how, but he is derelict in his duties by NOT enforcing the laws regarding illegal immigration, and my past support for him, versus my allegiance to our Constitution means that I can no longer stand with him.

Now for someone like you who actually says:

"W is wrong on this issue. Building big fences and "rounding them up and shipping them home" are what I want. Neither action will deter a terrorist, however"

...your grasp of national security issues is abysmal. How can you possibly say that "building big fences and...shipping them home" will NOT deter a terrorist? Are you daft?

Those 'big fences' make it more DIFFICULT for terrorists to enter the United States, and 'rounding them up' means that by deporting illegals who have no business in this country, the odds are increased that potential terrorists will be among those rounded up.

This isn't about Bush-hating, which is the last defense of the BushBot groupies who worship the ground GWB walks on, regardless of his contempt for, and failure to protect our Constitution. You need to decide if you're going to put your misplaced loyalty to a President now way off the reservation above that of the Constitution of the United States.

You whine about this thread about nuclear threats being 'hijacked' with the immigration issue, but has it occurred to your Bushwhacked mind that an unprotected border combined with no effective enforcement of immigration laws makes it all the more likely that a terrorist group may be able to smuggle a nuclear device into the United States?

For all of your sputterings about what you 'know', it is evident that you don't know a damn thing about what you're talking about.

And as for the ';all' in my posting, FYI buster: I don't need reinforcements to deal with the likes of you, that 'all' was to bring your absurd statements to the attention of the entire thread.

So what was your prior FR screen name? You're way too cocky to be a true newbie except in date of registration, sounds more like you're a retread trying to get back in.

You know, kinda like an illegal immigrant sneaking across the border.

[Sir Clean Plate Club]

"first of all, I'm no Bush-hater"

Wrong again. That is second of all. The libs took first place with their refrain of: "WE SUPPORT THE TROOPS!"

If you think a wall and air tight immigration will deter a terrorist for a half a minute then you have half a mind. And when you tell people that then you are fully dangerous.

Yap, yap, yapping, like any other cult member.. all with the logic and integrity of the OJ jury.

You used to be one of the good guys. Get well soon, dude.

[mkjessup]

"Get well soon dude"

I'm perfectly fine, thank you very much.

But in your case? Your ignorance is on display for all the world to see, and I predict for you a brief life expectancy, at least here on FR. The Viking Kitties are ultimately going to devour you.

Count on it, Mr. Registered-On-May-27-2007.

Darkwing104?

File this yokel under 'future kitty troll-snacks'.

[reagan_fanatic]

If you think a wall and air tight immigration will deter a terrorist for a half a minute then you have half a mind. And when you tell people that then you are fully dangerous.

Leaving the border virtually defenseless is an open invitation to terrorists and whoever else wishes us harm to enter this country undetected.

No one ever said building the wall would stop EVERYTHING AND EVERYBODY, but the alternative of doing NOTHING is not only much worse, but from a national security standpoint and just plain old common sense, unconscionable.

[Sir Clean Plate Club]

Terrorists don’t need no steenking invitations.

Other than than I agree.

Thanks for a substantive reply.

[Sir Clean Plate Club]

“Count on it, Mr. Registered-On-May-27-2007”

And I would be Mr. Registered-On-May-28-2007 if I weren’t -10 UTC!

(Don’t sell yourself short. The later I clicked a particular link means you are that much smarter. You and your impressive kitties need every advantage.)

[mkjessup]

Whatever.

[Dajjal]

jihad bump