Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bloomberg Leaves Republican Party (Breaking)
WCBS-TV | 06/19/07 | WCBS-TV New york

Posted on 06/19/2007 3:13:48 PM PDT by StatenIsland

Mayor Michael Bloonberg has announced that he is leaving the Republican Party, and will continue his Mayoralty as an Independent.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: bloomberg; goodriddance; nycmayor; rino; surprisesurprise; unity08; whodathunkit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300301-331 next last
To: PhilDragoo; potlatch

.

Good graphic Phil

Bloomie is one of the worst ever elected

$8 fee to drive into Manhattan

$24 fee for trucks

Bloomie made sure his businesses never paid their share

He is also a big buddy of Marc Rich


251 posted on 06/19/2007 6:29:25 PM PDT by devolve ( _Illegal_Aliens_Killed_25_Americans_Each_Day _A_Mex_Illegal_Alien_Sold_911_Terrorists_IDs_)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland
Bloomberg Leaves Republican Party

When was he ever a republican??

This run as an independent will hurt the dems more

252 posted on 06/19/2007 6:34:43 PM PDT by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

I would say good riddance, but Bloomer wasn’t really a republican anyway. Hell, I’m not a republican, so I really have no right to comment on this to start with. lol


253 posted on 06/19/2007 6:35:57 PM PDT by KoRn (Just Say NO ....To Liberal Republicans - FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Bump!!


254 posted on 06/19/2007 6:36:00 PM PDT by potlatch (MIZARU_ooo_()_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_()_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_()_ooo_))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
He’s going to be the Ross Perot of 2008, giving us a Clinton Presidency

Bloomberg is a socialist .. he'll hurt the Dem party a heck of a lot more then he'll hurt our side

255 posted on 06/19/2007 6:36:08 PM PDT by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: devolve; potlatch
He is also a big buddy of Marc Rich

That is rich indeed.

Quite a wheeler-dealer.

Now he's selling a bagel with two holes.

256 posted on 06/19/2007 6:38:36 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: devolve; PhilDragoo

I need a little sound file of LAUGHING! Maybe devolve can find one, lol!!


257 posted on 06/19/2007 6:43:36 PM PDT by potlatch (MIZARU_ooo_()_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_()_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_()_ooo_))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

He wasn’t really a Republican anyway (someone probably already posted this).

Tired of slick politicians!


258 posted on 06/19/2007 7:02:58 PM PDT by FeeinTennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

Laughing?

I’ll check!


259 posted on 06/19/2007 7:04:57 PM PDT by devolve ( _Illegal_Aliens_Killed_25_Americans_Each_Day _A_Mex_Illegal_Alien_Sold_911_Terrorists_IDs_)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: devolve

That’s OK devolve, I may find one. It’s not important.


260 posted on 06/19/2007 7:07:22 PM PDT by potlatch (MIZARU_ooo_()_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_()_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_()_ooo_))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
The great ethanol scam is another. Large agribusinesses have seen the value of their land increase by 50% because of the money they paid to politicians to force, at best, a marginal alternate energy source onto the market.

As a young news junkie, I for years wondered what it was that Archer Daniels Midland did that made it important enough to sponsor Meet the Press and Face the Nation alongside legendary corporations like General Electric and financial mammoths like Smith Barney and Merrill Lynch. ADM's commercials didn't promote a product that could be purchased by the general public, but the ads were vague as to reasons why it should be invested in as well -- it was like ADM was more of a charity than a business ("Supermarket to the World").

Only later did I understand that the targets of ADM's campaigns were not individual consumers, but politicians who watched the shows every Sunday. ADM was insisting it was the be-all and end-all to all sorts of "problems" that government claimed to be able to solve, gave gobs of cash to politicians, and every Sunday showed sixty second promotionals showing the pols how they could sell soybeans and corn as panacea to the electorate. Finally, it all paid off with ethanol getting its toehold in the market as "cleaner" and "greener" although the green is mostly in the form of greenbacks.

Now, after many years of mentioning it in speeches, President Bush is still holding on to the heretofore fruitless notion that sawgrass could help break the nationwide addiction to oil. In retrospect, I am not surprised he would buy it.

261 posted on 06/19/2007 7:08:53 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Has George W. Bush been taking Carter's Little Pills?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

I don’t think so Steve_Seattle. I wish nothing more but the polling I’ve seen so far has him hurting GOP candidates in purple and blue states. Also, right now, a large amount of the GOP feel like Bush and the Republican Party has left them. You and I of course know that the “Republicanism” represented by Bloomberg has nothing to do with genuine conservative values, but middle of the road Republicans we count on might get pulled in by him.


262 posted on 06/19/2007 7:14:26 PM PDT by Mister Politics (www.misterpolitics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Dave W
Ole Rudy will be the nominee. Then the whining will begin. The Beast or Rudy or Bloomberg? What on earth are you going to do?

Given that Ghouliani is currently behind a candidate that hasn't even announced yet in the Rasmussen poll, I assume your comments aren't serious?

263 posted on 06/19/2007 7:19:50 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

so the buffoon thinks he can get the Dems nomination?


264 posted on 06/19/2007 7:22:02 PM PDT by RDTF (www.imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Now, after many years of mentioning it in speeches, President Bush is still holding on to the heretofore fruitless notion that sawgrass could help break the nationwide addiction to oil. In retrospect, I am not surprised he would buy it.

It's really easy to "buy" a solution that involves no cost and no tradeoffs and is far enough away that noone can prove it's a stupid idea. The green movement has thrived on that kind of magical thinking for decades.

265 posted on 06/19/2007 7:26:09 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

This is hugh! And series! A mayor with a history of changing parties has changed parties again!

If anyone should be concerned about him running it ought to be Hillary since Rudy hasn’t any genuine chance of getting the nomination.


266 posted on 06/19/2007 7:26:31 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technogeeb
Well said.

Thanks. On thinking about this further, the best example of the rich in their buy-the-pols mode today is our country's China policy. One cannot explain the truly insane behavior both Clinton and W have engaged in with respect to the Chinese without resorting to the massive support for appeasement of China by the chamber-of-commerce guys--and, of course, China itself buying the Clintons.

267 posted on 06/19/2007 7:30:37 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
He’s going to be the Ross Perot of 2008, giving us a Clinton Presidency.

I think you give him far too much credit. The media connection is his asset. Everyone knows he's a spineless pipesmoker.

268 posted on 06/19/2007 7:32:09 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Thank you St. Jude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

Bllomberg is now an independent.

That’s not as bad as leaving the GOP to join al Qaeda like Ron Paul.


269 posted on 06/19/2007 7:34:56 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (Speaker Pelosi - Three cheers for Amnesty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

Right on. His progression is from opportunistic Liberal Democrat to opportunistic Liberal Republican to opportunistic Liberal Independent and he will draw away liberal Progressives making it good for the GOP if they get their s..t together in time.


270 posted on 06/19/2007 7:35:45 PM PDT by Postman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

No way. He’ll steal liberal votes, not conservatives. I think this is a good thing for Republicans. Let the RINOs leave now.


271 posted on 06/19/2007 7:37:08 PM PDT by rintense (I'm 4 Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
Well, I have to admit to a bit of guessing. By the way, I love your spelling of Giuliani.

However, Giuliani is staying steady in the polls despite the fact that his liberal social positions are becoming widely known.

The only reason Thompson is ahead by one point in the Rasmussen poll is because they stopped including Newt in the list of candidates, so Newt's supporters had to choose someone else. But the trend is clear...Thompson gaining and Rudy steady.

The media have not yet started to rip Thompson apart and neither has any of the candidates. When they get through ripping him to shreds, what will be left? This we don't know. Fred has hinted he may very well get out his red plaid shirt. Will that work today, the way it did in 1994?

Anyway, I like Fred, but I also think Rudy may have the best chance to beat the Beast. As Reagan said, "If you can't get the whole thing, some is better than nothing."

272 posted on 06/19/2007 7:37:15 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
He’s going to be the Ross Perot of 2008, giving us a Clinton Presidency.

Bloomberg peeling away a bunch of Hillary's support would be a sweet thing to behold, wouldn't it? :-)

273 posted on 06/19/2007 7:37:54 PM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

I will bet you Rudy will not be the republican nominee. Democrat, maybe. But not republican.


274 posted on 06/19/2007 7:41:11 PM PDT by rintense (I'm 4 Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

He may spend $1 billion on the race. If so, he will have impact. The billion dollars is his words.


275 posted on 06/19/2007 7:42:44 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
"'You sound like a communist.' Since when is being rich a bad thing in a capitalist country? You apparently can't comprehend English. I posted: Maybe he will take the big-business country-club Republicans with him. Why is that communist? Either you don't understand what communism is or you have an affinity for free speech -- and that sounds rather communist -- if you want to do namecalling." af·fin·i·ty /əˈfɪnɪti/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[uh-fin-i-tee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun, plural -ties., adjective –noun 1. a natural liking for or attraction to a person, thing, idea, etc. 2. a person, thing, idea, etc., for which such a natural liking or attraction is felt. 3. relationship by marriage or by ties other than those of blood (distinguished from consanguinity). 4. inherent likeness or agreement; close resemblance or connection. Yes, I have an affinity for free speech. And, yes, dislike of big-business country-club Republicans is communist.
276 posted on 06/19/2007 7:49:55 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

He could spend 10 billion. He could not get more than 2%. Don’t get me wrong. I hope he does better than I think, because he takes votes right out of the Democrats’ hide. But, he is simply a bad candidate. He has a voice that makes Hillary’s sound mellifluous. He will not win or even come close. You can take that to the bank.


277 posted on 06/19/2007 8:00:44 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

Except that Hagel is pro-gun, pro-life, and anti-taxing and spending. I don’t see how he could run on a ticket with Bloomberg.


278 posted on 06/19/2007 8:02:03 PM PDT by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: AfterManyASummer
socially libertarian

Are you insane??? A "libertarian" gun-grabber???
279 posted on 06/19/2007 8:04:31 PM PDT by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

With the majority of conservative voters still very upset with both the Democrats at every political level and with the Republicans at every political level, is there any possibility that both the Constitution Party and the Libertarian Party will start seeing much more support and much more votes for their candidates at every political level from now on?


280 posted on 06/19/2007 8:22:28 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

==With the majority of conservative voters still very upset with both the Democrats at every political level and with the Republicans at every political level, is there any possibility that both the Constitution Party and the Libertarian Party will start seeing much more support and much more votes for their candidates at every political level from now on?==

I’m a big fan of the Constitution Party on principle, but I wouldn’t risk voting for them unless a GOP landslide was predicted.

I don’t think the Constitution Party is going to get anywhere, though. People who are socially conservative, fiscally conservative, anti-globalist and pro-American on trade aren’t exactly the ones with the most money to contribute.

As for the Libertarian Party, I don’t know much about them.


281 posted on 06/19/2007 8:46:31 PM PDT by AfterManyASummer (Hunter/Huckabee '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian

==Are you insane??? A “libertarian” gun-grabber???==

I didn’t know that. On the other hand, most of the pro-abortion folks are anti-RKBA; so Bloomberg will easily attract them.


282 posted on 06/19/2007 8:49:07 PM PDT by AfterManyASummer (Hunter/Huckabee '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

A non-Republican is now declaring he is not a Republican. Hmmmmm..... is there a story here?


283 posted on 06/19/2007 8:52:17 PM PDT by admiralsn (An army of sheep led by a lion would defeat an army of lions led by a sheep. --Asian Proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb; All

Anyone know/have the poll data on whether or not he’ll take from the pubs or dems....?


284 posted on 06/19/2007 9:09:07 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (Fred Thompson....IMWITHFRED.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

He was a Republican?


285 posted on 06/19/2007 9:19:17 PM PDT by Natchez Hawk (Happy Trails Bob Barker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
And, yes, dislike of big-business country-club Republicans is communist.

I don't think that word means what you think it means. Dislike of big-business country club Republicans is one thing. Supporting a command and control economy is another. Just because you don't like big-business country club Republicans doesn't mean that you want to redistribute the wealth of all the kulaks.

286 posted on 06/19/2007 9:25:25 PM PDT by burzum (None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
With the majority of conservative voters still very upset with both the Democrats at every political level and with the Republicans at every political level, is there any possibility that both the Constitution Party and the Libertarian Party will start seeing much more support and much more votes for their candidates at every political level from now on?

No. Without a runoff system your vote can be used against you. If you vote for a third party candidate you help the Democrats. Both the Republican Party and the Democrat Party use this technique to blackmail their voters. They don't have to be good, only better in the eyes of the voter than the opposition. If we had something like IRV I think we would find the Republican Party would suddenly become much more responsive to voters.

287 posted on 06/19/2007 9:29:39 PM PDT by burzum (None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

How could anyone notice?


288 posted on 06/19/2007 9:32:20 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

“That’s not as bad as leaving the GOP to join al Qaeda like Ron Paul.”

And that’s not even a LITTLE BIT over the top, huh?


289 posted on 06/19/2007 9:32:36 PM PDT by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland
GOP membership hotline: "Press 2 for English..."

R.N.C. = the Really Not Conservative party

290 posted on 06/19/2007 9:44:22 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose2004
he’ll split the liberal vote and help the Repubs. Go Mike, run you self centered liberal.

You are so right. RUN BLOOMY; RUN!!!
291 posted on 06/19/2007 9:53:38 PM PDT by no dems (Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Agree. Big business and private clubs are part of the great American fabric.


292 posted on 06/19/2007 10:02:02 PM PDT by littlehouse36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

well said ... it’s people like you who run small businesses who get squeezed by the corporate guru’s and their K Street lobbyists. Unfortunately, few recognize that.

The current immigration bill would not be out there were it not for big business and the multitude of related trade associations in DC lobbying full time. We can complain about LaRaza all we want, but on its own it wouldn’t have been able to pull in enough Congressmen and Senators to bring this bill to the Floor, much less have a chance of passing.


293 posted on 06/19/2007 10:17:30 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: burzum

The IRV should be encouraged at every political level! I would definitely like to know how each of the GOP Presidential candidates, including Fred Thompson and Newt Gingrich, feel about possibly implementing the IRV at every political level.


294 posted on 06/19/2007 10:40:37 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; devolve; PhilDragoo

I wish I had the time to read the thread.
I’m getting ready for a rather long trip.

But, I have to say that I am MOST impressed with your posts.

Thank you all!


295 posted on 06/19/2007 10:54:26 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
well said ... it’s people like you who run small businesses who get squeezed by the corporate guru’s and their K Street lobbyists. Unfortunately, few recognize that. The current immigration bill would not be out there were it not for big business and the multitude of related trade associations in DC lobbying full time. We can complain about LaRaza all we want, but on its own it wouldn’t have been able to pull in enough Congressmen and Senators to bring this bill to the Floor, much less have a chance of passing.

It doesn't affect my business too much. But the blame needs to be squarely apportioned between the chamber guys, who drool over the prospect of an underclass to exploit for cheap labor and the leftists, who drool over the prospect of another underclass to exploit for cheap votes. Also, companies like First Data (Western Union) who make huge amounts of money remitting money to Mexico.

A guest worker class is perfect for both groups. Underclass members work for cheap, are second class residents and their kids (citizens all) grow up with the typical resentments and entitlement sense of the underclass and grow up to be perfect little exploitable democrats.

On balance, the left is more to blame--you can look at the senate votes and see where the balance lies. But without the chamber guys, the left would be unable to realize its takeover vision for America. It's an unholy alliance of venal motives all around.

But there it is. Either we beat it as citizens without huge money resources and no support from the major media outlets or we're the Senate's clay pigeon with Trent Lott, John McCain and Teddy Kennedy taking shots at us while they laugh in Senatorial bonhomie and congratulate each other on the good shots.

296 posted on 06/19/2007 11:51:58 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Bloomberg will take more votes from the Dems than the Republicans...

...by a margin of about 250-50...nationwide.


297 posted on 06/20/2007 2:42:10 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: moose2004
Wrong, it’s the exact opposite, he’ll split the liberal vote and help the Repubs. Go Mike, run you self centered liberal.

Mike Bloomberg will be the John Anderson of 2008.

298 posted on 06/20/2007 4:43:39 AM PDT by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

With the Republicans going along with the dems on some issues ie: MCCAIN/Kennedy immigration disaster, enters a third party, an independent with a different message than the two parties who knows what will happen.

An Independent may just win.

Memo to GOP stop the talk of amnesty, stop going Globalism, go back to our roots and we can and will have a chance.


299 posted on 06/20/2007 5:24:45 AM PDT by stopem (God Bless the U.S.A AND the Troops who protect her, and their Commander In Chief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: stopem

The right independent could possibly win in the right scenario.

Never in a million years do I think Mike Bloomberg will be “the right” anything on a national level.


300 posted on 06/20/2007 5:29:00 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300301-331 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson