Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bloomberg's America is different from Ross Perot's
CNN ^ | June 23, 2007 | Roland S. Martin

Posted on 06/23/2007 11:03:10 AM PDT by OKIEDOC

Who is Bloomberg's constituency? Is it Republicans who are desperate for a standard-bearer in the mold of Ronald Reagan? Bloomberg doesn't appeal to the GOP base -- he's liberal, from New York and is Jewish. (Be honest, if he was a hard-core conservative and a Baptist, they would be falling over him.)

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bloomersberger; fruity; liberal; newyork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
A CNN liberal playing the Jessie Jackson/Al Sharpton religious/race baiting and enabling card.

CNN needs to be called out on this kind of rhetoric from and obvious racists thinking writer.

Yep Senor Martin us Republican base have been called many things lately, some bad words by our own elected politicians.

Words like bigot, Latino haters, racists and others come to mind.

However, Mr. Martin had you opened your obviously racists eyes and ears you would have seen the hand writing on the wall or perhaps a Baptist church service.

Something that you probably do not know and understand Mr. Martin is that it is in the best interest of Christians that Jews should not parish from the face of this earth.

I judge Bloomberg not on his religious affiliation but on his idiotic liberal dictatorial know it all attitude that he brought to the mayors job.

Just a lowly opinion of a red state wannabe.

1 posted on 06/23/2007 11:03:12 AM PDT by OKIEDOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

How can Bloomberg know anything about America, he’s never lived there?


2 posted on 06/23/2007 11:06:50 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
Be honest, if he was a hard-core conservative and a Baptist, they would be falling over him.

If he was a true conservative we'd be willing to listen carefully to what he has to say...regardless of his religion.

3 posted on 06/23/2007 11:07:55 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative ("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

The only thing that needed to be said was that Bloomberg is a liberal and not a hardcore conservative. The race/religion baiting going on is sickening. I think, no I KNOW, that if the two candidates for president were a Jewish conservative, and Jimmy Carter, who was a very devout Baptist, there wouldnt be any question who conservatives would vote for. Religion does not enter the equation.


4 posted on 06/23/2007 11:08:39 AM PDT by oakcon (Dulce et Decorum est pro Patria mori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

This youtube video will explain everything that an out of towner needs to know about how Mike Bloomberg see’s himself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyj0dR5o_Z8


5 posted on 06/23/2007 11:10:58 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

An excellent point.


6 posted on 06/23/2007 11:11:54 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

Stupidest statment I have read in a long time.

To paraphrase: Bloomberg is a liberal, but if he was a conservative then conservatives would support him.

How very hard hitting and provacative /sarc. Is this what passes for journalism today? Oh wait, it is.


7 posted on 06/23/2007 11:12:37 AM PDT by frankiep (Beer - the cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
For more on Bloomberg, click on this thread...

Fmr. Bloomberg Adviser: '08 Run '80% Probable' if Parties Nominate Extremists (Romney an extremist?)

Run, Bloomie, run!

8 posted on 06/23/2007 11:14:31 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
Bloomberg would totally disarm every American if he had the power. That alone makes him much too dangerous to ever be in a position of power outside of NYC. The fact that he’s Jewish is irrelevant.
9 posted on 06/23/2007 11:14:37 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (Run, Fred run! I will send my donation as soon as you announce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
He’s already trying to disarm every American even though he doesn’t have the power. I’ve never heard of a politician who worked harder to exert extra-jurisdictional authority.
10 posted on 06/23/2007 11:16:25 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
Bloomberg doesn't appeal to the GOP base -- he's liberal, from New York and is Jewish. (Be honest, if he was a hard-core conservative and a Baptist, they would be falling over him.)

If he were a hard core conservative, even if he were not Baptist, he wouldn't be flirting with a third party run; he'd be one of the Republican party candidates. Even if he does try to run as an Independent, he won't be hurting the Republicans; he'll get votes from disaffected Democrats who can't stand Hillary, or don't think Obama has enough political experience.

The writer is right about one thing though, Bloomberg won't get elected, even if he does burn some of his personal wealth trying. He's just not in step with most Americans.

11 posted on 06/23/2007 11:16:36 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

Perot is billionaire. Bloomberg is billionaire. A billion dollars can give one delusions of grandeur, and that is where the similarity ends. Perot was flaky to the point of a pathology, but his political piano kept knocking out populist tunes, and with the elitist clowns in Washington running the country into the ground, a nut like Perot can play a political tune which sounds pretty good for a while. Bloomberg is an elitist from head to toe and any elitist with enough money can buy any office he pleases in NY and a handful of East Coast states, but the tune this schmuck plays has no resonance whatsoever, not even for the New York minute that Perot on had on the political stage.


12 posted on 06/23/2007 11:17:17 AM PDT by Biblebelter (I can't believe people still watch TV with the sound on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
(Be honest, if he was a hard-core conservative and a Baptist, they would be falling over him.)

What a stupid remark. Being a conservative is a requirement for most conservatives. I could care less about the religious affiliation, as long as it's not muslim. Bloomberg just comes across as very arrogant. And that would turn off a lot of people. But arrogance is normally a liberal trait.

13 posted on 06/23/2007 11:18:18 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (Run, Fred run! I will send my donation as soon as you announce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
All I know is Bloomberg is one of the most boring speakers to ever mount a podium. He missed his true calling, he should have been a sleep therapist.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

14 posted on 06/23/2007 11:20:04 AM PDT by AdvisorB ("A Hillary Clinton presidency will result in a weaker economy and a weaker America" Dick Morris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oakcon

>I KNOW, that if the two candidates for president were a Jewish conservative, and Jimmy Carter, who was a very devout Baptist, there wouldnt be any question who conservatives would vote for.

Good point. How about if it was a black Muslim conservative?
I hope the answer is still the same.

I’m not too worried about the black part, but...


15 posted on 06/23/2007 11:23:42 AM PDT by chipengineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chipengineer

And a Mormon? I wouldn’t have thought it would be an issue with a lot of so-called conservatives, but apparently Jews and Mormons do not get equal standing in our midst.

They wouldn’t in liberal circles, either, of course, but that’s par for the course for anyone with strong religious convictions.


16 posted on 06/23/2007 11:33:54 AM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
Excellent comment.

Liberals just do not understand that many Christians have been driven into a defensive posture.

We either support those of our own beliefs or completely give up on the values that act as glue to hold this country together.

17 posted on 06/23/2007 11:39:45 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, DUNCAN or THOMPSON 08, ELECTION 2008, MOST IMPORTANT OF MY LIFE TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

Heard Bloomberg first time this week. He is sharp, way beyond the boatload of candidates of either major party. So, they say he is a Liberal of the worst kind. Maybe he won’t win anywhere but NYC. He will be heard from anyway.


18 posted on 06/23/2007 11:43:22 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oakcon
Believe me I am still having night sweats from my misguided youthful days of passing out Jimmy Carter campaign literature to an unsuspecting public.

I wonder if St Peter will remember that I once supported the worst president in the history of mankind. LOL

What really worries me, will God ever forgive me such a big blunder.

19 posted on 06/23/2007 11:50:12 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, DUNCAN or THOMPSON 08, ELECTION 2008, MOST IMPORTANT OF MY LIFE TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
>>Be honest, if he was a hard-core conservative and a Baptist, they would be falling over him.

>If he was a true conservative we'd be willing to listen carefully to what he has to say...regardless of his religion.

Yes, that was a cheap shot on their part.

Bloomberg's constitutency would be the disaffected middle. People who aren't strongly ideological but who are fed up with today's politics.

Maybe if you take the set of people who would have voted for Perot in 1992 and 1996, John Anderson in 1980, and Eugene McCarthy in 1976 you get an idea of who would vote for Bloomberg.

Maybe 3-5% of the population, people who used to be Republicans long ago, but haven't gotten around to becoming Democrats.

Somebody said candidates like Anderson do well in states with bottle deposit laws. Bloomberg will have a following in, say, Maine, Connecticut, Oregon, Colorado, Wisconsin and Iowa.

I don't know if those states all have bottle return laws, but they all had that old liberal Republican tradition. Even though his strength will be in Democrat states, he still may take more voters away from the Republicans.

20 posted on 06/23/2007 11:51:24 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson