Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A GOP Plan to Oust Cheney [good for laughs]
The Washington Post ^ | 7/26/07 | Sally Quinn

Posted on 06/25/2007 9:33:07 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn

The big question right now among Republicans is how to remove Vice President Cheney from office. Even before this week's blockbuster series in The Post, discontent in Republican ranks was rising.

As the reputed architect of the war in Iraq, Cheney is viewed as toxic, and as the administration's leading proponent of an attack on Iran, he is seen as dangerous. As long as he remains vice president, according to this thinking, he has the potential to drag down every member of the party -- including the presidential nominee -- in next year's elections.

Removing a sitting vice president is not easy, but this may be the moment. I remember Barry Goldwater sitting in my parents' living room in 1973, in the last days of Watergate, debating whether to lead a group of senior Republicans to the White House to tell President Nixon he had to go.

(snip)

Today, another group of party elders, led by Sen. John Warner of Virginia, could well do the same. They could act out of concern for our country's plummeting reputation throughout the world, particularly in the Middle East.

For such a plan to work, however, they would need a ready replacement. Until recently, there hasn't been an acceptable alternative to Cheney -- nor has there been a persuasive argument to convince President Bush to make a change. Now there is.

(snip)

That leaves Fred Thompson. Everybody loves Fred.

(snip)

He could be just the partner to bring out Bush's better nature -- or at least be a sensible voice of reason. I could easily imagine him telling the president, "For God's sake, do not push that button!" -- a command I have a hard time hearing Cheney give.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cheney; fredthompson; sallyquinn; vpotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: marron

If Cheney could come up with a bionic heart, he would be my number one choice for president.


When I heard Fred being interviewed by the Hoover scholar, it made me think of Cheney at the VP debates. Casual brilliance.


61 posted on 06/26/2007 6:58:34 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

They are trying to get Cheney removed so that when they impeach Bush, Pelosi gets to be President.


62 posted on 06/26/2007 7:16:59 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn; snugs; MJY1288; ohioWfan; DrDeb; Wolfstar; Mo1; Peach; GretchenM; ...

Boy, you’re right. Old Sally, grand dame of DC hosteses, just can’t keep her hands out of her husband’s (Ben Bradlee - Washington Post Vice President At Large and the newspaper’s former executive editor) pot, although I’m sure he’s not a reluctant accomplice.

I also find her position as co-writer “On Faith” totally laughable.


63 posted on 06/26/2007 7:30:19 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Pathetic beyond belief but very laughable :)
64 posted on 06/26/2007 7:50:00 AM PDT by jveritas (Support the Commander in Chief in Times of War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Sally Quinn is a vindictive fool.

She needs to stop drinking

65 posted on 06/26/2007 7:51:00 AM PDT by Kaslin (Fred Thompson for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

Silly libs!


66 posted on 06/26/2007 7:52:15 AM PDT by airborne (COULTER: Actually, my favorite candidate is [Rep.] Duncan Hunter [R-CA], and he is magnificent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne; All
This is what Heading Right has to say

A Charming Naiveté At The Washington Post

67 posted on 06/26/2007 8:05:29 AM PDT by Kaslin (Fred Thompson for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

They’re still so afraid of big, bad Cheney. So for the Washington COMpost, speculation now passes for news. Disgraceful.


68 posted on 06/26/2007 8:09:47 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (Don't you worry, never fear, FDT will soon be here. http://www.imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Be careful what you wish for.


69 posted on 06/26/2007 8:10:24 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (Don't you worry, never fear, FDT will soon be here. http://www.imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
No worries, women understand it!

I love Fred!!

70 posted on 06/26/2007 8:18:14 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (Don't you worry, never fear, FDT will soon be here. http://www.imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan

Methinks a lot of people missed the “almost.” He has become so focused on this issue that everything, including Iraq, seems to be neglected lately.


71 posted on 06/26/2007 8:18:54 AM PDT by Ingtar (...right wing conservatives are growing tired of crawling on bloody stumps looking for scraps - JRob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan
No worries, women understand it!

And that's good enough for me.

72 posted on 06/26/2007 8:20:33 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Kill Bill II, The Night of the Living Dead Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

I didn’t miss the “almost.” It seemed to be an implied parenthetical. IMO


73 posted on 06/26/2007 8:23:44 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (Don't you worry, never fear, FDT will soon be here. http://www.imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush

freep mail me and it’s done )~


74 posted on 06/26/2007 9:09:55 AM PDT by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

Of course, the moonbats want to impeach both Bush AND
Cheney. That would make Nancy Pelosi president (God
forbid). The only upside to that scenario would be the resulting cat fight between Pelosi and Hillary for the oval office

Man, that’s what I’ve been thinking. Pelosi wants to sneak in ahead of Hillary. Cat fight, exactly what I was thinking. Does anyone know what their relationship is? Has Pelosi ever supported Hillary?


75 posted on 06/26/2007 9:37:30 AM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn; Politicalmom
Thanks, Mom...;)
This sounds like a hit piece on Fred Thompson to me.
Thats who it would hurt the most, if this lame brained asinine idea ever come to fruition.
Actually, isn't this a favorite trick of the marxist regimes?
Annoint the predecessor by removing someone and placing the anointed in that position?

These people are scared.
They are scared of Fred Thompson, and they are most assuredly afraid of the conservative grassroots movement.

76 posted on 06/26/2007 12:22:58 PM PDT by concretebob (I'm NOT pro-war, I'm ANTI - TERRORIST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

That ploy would be looked upon with great disdain by the American people; starting with me.

Why not get Dubya to resign and let Cheney become the Prez for the next year and a half. That would drive the moonbats into bowel orgasms.


77 posted on 06/26/2007 12:50:40 PM PDT by no dems (Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shelayne

Sheylayne, thanks for the laugh. This thread sure needed one.


78 posted on 06/26/2007 2:23:55 PM PDT by kitkat (I refuse to let the DUers chase me off FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

You have to have basis for impeachment, which doesn’t exist. Being upset with the President is not basis. This article is fantasy. But then the Left is based on wishful thinking. I too, am upset about the amnesty, but I would never vote for impeachment because 1) we are at war, and 2)it aides the Democrat agenda. I prefer to look at the bigger picture.


79 posted on 06/26/2007 3:50:22 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oneamericanvoice

I agree there is no basis. I was trying to say that it might at least prove a distraction. But I was not advocating it.


80 posted on 06/26/2007 4:05:56 PM PDT by Ingtar (...right wing conservatives are growing tired of crawling on bloody stumps looking for scraps - JRob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson