Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crater Could Solve 1908 Tunguska Meteor Mystery
Space.com ^ | 06:27 26 June 2007 ET | By Dave Mosher - Staff Writer

Posted on 06/27/2007 6:16:57 PM PDT by raygun

In late June of 1908, a fireball exploded above the remote Russian forests of Tunguska, Siberia, flattening more than 800 square miles of trees. Researchers think a meteor was responsible for the devastation, but neither its fragments nor any impact craters have been discovered.

Astronomers have been left to guess whether the object was an asteroid or a comet, and figuring out what it was would allow better modeling of potential future calamities.

Italian researchers now think they've found a smoking gun: The 164-foot-deep Lake Cheko, located just 5 miles northwest of the epicenter of destruction.

"When we looked at the bottom of the lake, we measured seismic waves reflecting off of something," said Giuseppe Longo, a physicist at the University of Bologna in Italy and co-author of the study. "Nobody has found this before. We can only explain that and the shape of the lake as a low-velocity impact crater."

Should the team turn up conclusive evidence of an asteroid or comet on a later expedition, when they obtain a deeper core sample beneath the lake, remaining mysteries surrounding the Tunguska event may be solved.

The findings are detailed in this month's online version of the journal Terra Nova.

Submerged evidence

During a 1999 expedition, Longo's team didn't plan to investigate Lake Cheko as an impact crater, but rather to look for meteoroid dust in its submerged sediments. While sonar-scanning the lake's topography, they were struck by its cone-like features.

"Expeditions in the 1960s concluded the lake was not an impact crater, but their technologies were limited," Longo said. With the advent of better sonar and computer technologies, he explained, the lake took shape.

Going a step further, Longo's team dove to the bottom and took 6-foot core samples, revealing fresh mud-like sediment on top of "chaotic deposits" beneath. Still, Longo explained the samples are inconclusive of a meteorite impact.

"To really find out if this is an impact crater," Long said, "we need a core sample 10 meters (33 feet) into the bottom" in order to investigate a spot where the team detected a "reflecting" anomaly with their seismic instruments. They think this could be where the ground was compacted by an impact or where part of the meteorite itself lies: The object, if found, could be more than 30 feet in diameter and weigh almost 1,700 tons-the weight of about 42 fully-loaded semi-trailers.

Caution for now

From a UFO crash to a wandering black hole, wild (and wildly unsupported) explanations for the Tunguska event have been proposed. Alan Harris, a planetary scientist at the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado, said the proposal by Longo's team isn't one of them.

"I was impressed by their work and I don't think it's something you can wave off," said Harris, who was not involved in the research.

Longo and his team "are among the recognized authorities on Tunguska" in the world, Harris told SPACE.com. "It would be thrilling to dig up chunks of the meteor body, if they can manage to. It would lay the question to rest whether or not Tunguska was a comet or asteroid."

Some researchers, however, are less confident in the team's conclusions.

"We know from the entry physics that the largest and most energetic objects penetrate deepest," said David Morrison, an astronomer with NASA's Ames Research Center. That only a fragment of the main explosion reached the ground and made a relatively small crater, without creating a larger main crater, seems contradictory to Morrison.

Harris agreed that physics could work against Longo's explanation, but did note that similar events-with impact craters-have been documented all over the world.

"In 1947, the Russian Sikhote-Alin meteorite created 100 small craters. Some were 20 meters (66 feet) across," Harris said. A site in Poland also exists, he explained, where a large meteor exploded and created a series of small lakes. "If the fragment was traveling slowly enough, there's actually a good chance (Longo's team) will unearth some meteorite material," Harris said.

Longo's team plans to return to Lake Cheko next summer, close to the 100th anniversary of the Tunguska Event. "This is important work because we can make better conclusions about how cosmic bodies impact the Earth, and what they're made of," Longo said. "And it could help us find ways to protect our planet from future impacts of this kind."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: asteroid; asteroids; astronomy; catastrophism; comet; comets; craters; deepimpact; geology; godsgravesglyphs; impact; impactcraters; lakecheko; meteor; meteors; russia; science; siberia; tunguska
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: raygun

They need to do further investigation. Send money.


41 posted on 12/21/2007 4:17:33 PM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no one in particular

HillaryChavez seems to have left the building.

Probably over at the DUmpster regaling them with tales of how he/she/it really put one over on the FR Mod Squad this time...


42 posted on 12/21/2007 4:19:00 PM PST by null and void (I've always liked Ron Paul, he is not a like a serial rapist. - rovenstinez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: VOA
Asteroid may hit Mars in next month

[snip]

"The asteroid, known as 2007 WD5, was discovered in late November and is similar in size to an object that hit remote central Siberia in 1908, unleashing energy equivalent to a 15-megaton nuclear bomb and wiping out 60 million trees.

Scientists tracking the asteroid, currently halfway between Earth and Mars, initially put the odds of impact at 1 in 350 but increased the chances this week. Scientists expect the odds to diminish again early next month after getting new observations of the asteroid's orbit, Chesley said."

[snip]

"If the asteroid does smash into Mars, it will probably hit near the equator close to where the rover Opportunity has been exploring the Martian plains since 2004."

43 posted on 12/21/2007 6:36:55 PM PST by raygun ("It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: null and void

What are you talking ‘bout?


44 posted on 12/22/2007 5:34:59 PM PST by raygun ("It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: raygun

He/she/it posted the nuked comments on this thread.


45 posted on 12/22/2007 5:43:50 PM PST by null and void (I've always liked Ron Paul, he is not a like a serial rapist. - rovenstinez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: null and void

When? Was that some sort of new startling revelation or something? I appreciate you keeping me appraised, and what not, but...

Dude!


46 posted on 12/22/2007 6:46:31 PM PST by raygun ("It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: raygun

Slow news day...


47 posted on 12/22/2007 6:49:49 PM PST by null and void (I've always liked Ron Paul, he is not a like a serial rapist. - rovenstinez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: raygun

Oh, come one.

All the leading scientists know it was some kind of response from nature, to man’s doings.


48 posted on 12/22/2007 6:51:45 PM PST by unspun (God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raygun
/s
49 posted on 12/22/2007 6:52:19 PM PST by unspun (God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

btt


50 posted on 12/22/2007 6:58:29 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz

Color me “stupid”, but I just don’t get it.


51 posted on 12/22/2007 7:16:18 PM PST by raygun ("It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: raygun
Eh, you're asking me for advice?!?!
52 posted on 12/22/2007 7:24:48 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz

Eh, wherever did you get that idea?


53 posted on 12/22/2007 9:07:39 PM PST by raygun ("It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson