Skip to comments.
President fires official over border fence fight
KOMO-TV ^
| July 12 2007
| KOMO-TV
Posted on 07/12/2007 9:13:31 PM PDT by republicpictures
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: montag813
21
posted on
07/12/2007 10:34:58 PM PDT
by
Pelham
(Deportation- without it you have amnesty.)
To: sionnsar
For the WA St. ping list.
22
posted on
07/12/2007 11:35:38 PM PDT
by
GretchenM
(What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus)
To: montag813
Don’t forget NCIS and Navy Secretary Winter, who refuses to review their fubar investigative techniques.
23
posted on
07/13/2007 12:49:17 AM PDT
by
4woodenboats
(DefendOurMarines.com)
To: stinkerpot65
Bush didn't imprison anybody. The political pressure to persecute Marines came directly from scammin Jack Murtha, primarily to influence the public against Bush Policy to maintain the global war on terror.
The same enemedia that has leaked national security secrets to undercut Bush and attack his cabinet has slandered the troops.
How did Murtha calling our troops cold blooded murderers, and the NYT, WaPo, Time, etc. all of whom are dedicated Bush enemies, all of whom refer to the ambush by insurgents in Haditha as a massacre by Marines, get twisted in your mind into "Bush imprisons combat soldiers"?
You got BDS in a big, big way, and it's confusing you.
24
posted on
07/13/2007 1:04:16 AM PDT
by
4woodenboats
(DefendOurMarines.com)
To: republicpictures
There must be a story behind that story on both the retaining wall and the firing.
25
posted on
07/13/2007 3:18:47 AM PDT
by
familyop
To: familyop
All property is held subject to the public’s right of paying just compensation for “taking” the property for a legitimate public purpose. I would think that if the treaty preceeded the patenting of the land, the title to the land was subject to treaty provisions. If it was patented after the treaty, then the treaty prohibitions would be a taking of the right to use and enjoy. If it is substantial enough, then the court of claims could award just compensation. Otherwise, the court may say it was not a taking of the entire use of the property or taking of sufficient value to qualify for compensation.
26
posted on
07/13/2007 3:31:05 AM PDT
by
marsh2
To: republicpictures
"It's on our property," Leu said. "Don't you have a right, as an American, to your own property? You paid for it." Don't worry, ma'am. The President will save you!
27
posted on
07/13/2007 3:34:48 AM PDT
by
ovrtaxt
(The FairTax and the North American Union are mutually exclusive.)
To: miliantnutcase; sourcery
Interesting question....can the the Constitution allow what it expressly forbids ?
Looks like it
"Article V
This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
28
posted on
07/13/2007 3:50:36 AM PDT
by
stylin19a
(Since bad golf shots come in groups of 3, a 4th bad shot is the start of the next group of 3)
To: paul51
"firing 100 federal bureaucrats"
They can't be fired or demoted. They are union. All he can do is move them laterally or up.
To: Paperdoll
“But do civil servants make $100,000 these days?”
Yes.
30
posted on
07/13/2007 4:15:48 AM PDT
by
PLMerite
("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
To: just mimi; Eaker; humblegunner; thackney; TheMom; pax_et_bonum; Allegra; dasher; NYTexan; ...
31
posted on
07/13/2007 5:42:44 AM PDT
by
stevie_d_64
(Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
To: republicpictures
Also...
Isn’t it amazing how many citizens in this country actually own property directly on the international border...Both north and south...
Just an observation...
32
posted on
07/13/2007 5:45:55 AM PDT
by
stevie_d_64
(Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
To: republicpictures
33
posted on
07/13/2007 5:47:09 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: LasVegasMac
He gets $135,000 a YEAR!!
34
posted on
07/13/2007 5:50:56 AM PDT
by
Suzy Quzy
(Hillary in '08.....Her PHONINESS is GENUINE !!!!)
To: Paperdoll
Is he a civil servant, and can civil servants be fired now? Read about it somewhere, something to do with his position being covered by an international treaty between the US and Canada. He flat out said the POTUS does not have the authority to fire me!
And another poster said his salary is $135,000 a year!
35
posted on
07/13/2007 6:25:19 AM PDT
by
LasVegasMac
(I've reached the age where happy hour is a nap.)
To: LasVegasMac
I doubt that he has “civil service” status....not at that salary. I think there was some guideline under Homeland Security that says he can be fired.
36
posted on
07/13/2007 6:33:55 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
To: 4woodenboats
Bush is the commander in chief. He runs the military and the INS and the Justice Department. He could put a stop to it, but he doesn’t give a flip.
37
posted on
07/13/2007 9:29:24 AM PDT
by
stinkerpot65
(Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
To: All
treaties won’t mean nothing when we (mexico, USA, canada) are all one bug happy country
38
posted on
07/13/2007 4:33:52 PM PDT
by
sure_fine
( • not one to over kill the thought process)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson