Posted on 07/29/2007 6:22:19 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
That makes sense. It is the same old drivel.
Under current circumstances, it might be best if you weren’t a total shill for GW. It is going to cost you and your children and grandchildren big time. Other than that you might try learning to read, learn a thought process, actually learn a bit about what you are about to vaporlock over.
Say what you want about Ron Paul’s position on our forays into wars we need not be in. I was in Saigon during Tet in ‘68. Were you?
Actually, I think they copy/paste their old stuff from previous threads, then slap each other on the back as though it’s funnier each time.
LOL. you are a classic
elhombrelibre posted the exact same thing twice in posts 94 and 103. Cut and paste job in the same thread. Is this a new record?
Your remarks always calms my soul.
Some of the posters here at Free Republic are real trouble makers and love to cause friction among us...
“Now they post their very own thread just to get a full bashfest going and we pick up several new pinglist members who are interested in following Dr. Paul’s campaign. LOL.”
I’ll second that LOL.
The message of freedom and personal responsibility always shines through slogans, mantras, and B.S.
I suppose that if the poor thing starts spamming himself with his own posts, we’ll be forced to notify the mods to call the Men In White Coats. LOL.
you ar a funny s/o/b
Less than a fly speck.
a little bold isn’ it?
I would like smaller federal government on the radar this election season.
So limiting the federal government & protecting our sovereignty doesn’t mean anything to you, I guess.
Rather than dealing with the question you ...speak nonsense.
How about yes limiting the federal government and protecting our sovereignty,,,as well as supporting our friends...wait Paul does not do that hence his continual non support for Israel and his blaming America first attitude. He is a weasely anti-semite.
“Lyndon LaRouche had smarter followers.”
Do you consider yourself smart?
That’s because laws pertaining to marriage are NOT under federal jurisdiction and Paul felt that giving the feds that kind of power could turn against social conservatives under the wrong President and wrong political party (i.e. Democrats).
That’s because laws pertaining to marriage are NOT under federal jurisdiction and Paul felt that giving the feds that kind of power could turn against social conservatives under the wrong President and wrong political party (i.e. Democrats).
His recognition of the separation of powers is precisely what makes him a conservative since most of us don’t want Washington involved in the regulation of marriages. The unintended effects of giving it that kind of power are unthinkable under Obama and a Democratic Congress.
As for now, I'm loading my IPOD in preparation for the 17+ h our trip from H'ville, Alabama to COB --------, Iraq. Wheels up Sunday, August 5th.
“but when a pro-Constitution Republican runs....HES A KOOK!” Riiiiiggggghhhhhhhhhhtttttttt! It isn’t the fact that he courts 9/11 Truthers that makes him a kook -— it is the fact the supports the constitution! ~snicker~ You know, the first step in getting better is to acknowledge the problem, dear.
Thanks. Wanted to have departed two weeks ago. Passport was a real pain. Murphy’s Law intersected with the Peter Principle. Gosh was it ever ugly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.