Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2 children found dead in trash bags under S.C. apartment sink
The State ^ | 31 July 2007 | BRUCE SMITH

Posted on 07/31/2007 6:36:54 PM PDT by aomagrat

HANAHAN, S.C. (AP) — Two small children who had been left in a hot car while their mother was at work were later found dead, their bodies in trash bags under an apartment sink, authorities said Tuesday.

Autopsies were scheduled Tuesday to determine the causes of death of 1-year-old girl Triniti Campbell and 4-year-old Shawn Campbell Jr., Berkeley County Deputy Coroner George Oliver said.

The children's mother, Sametta Heyward, 27, had taken them to work Monday in downtown Charleston and left them in her car all day as the temperature outside rose to 88 degrees, Oliver said.

Officers investigating a report of a disturbance at Heyward's apartment Monday night and found her crying and yelling, "'Oh, my babies,"' according to an incident report.

A man holding Heyward told officers "the kids were in trash bags and under the cabinet." The police report said Heyward tried to bite and kick the officers, had to be restrained, and was taken to a hospital because medics thought she could be having seizures.

"She stated she wanted to die and asked officers to kill her," the report said.

Hanahan Police Chief Don Wilcox said investigators have not been able to talk to the woman because she was advised by an attorney not to say anything.

"We're trying to run down the timeline, as well as get any physical evidence, so we can determine exactly what took place," Wilcox said.

Neighbor Brandon Coving said he saw Heyward and the children on Sunday. "They were running around, and she had a big smile on her face, and it seemed like a regular day," he said.

Coving lived about eight doors down from Heyward on the second floor of The Willows, a two-story apartment complex with cranberry red doors. There are 44 units at the complex, which resembles a motel.

Apartment manager Ricky Dyson said the 252 square-foot apartment had a queen bed, a small bathroom and an efficiency kitchen.

He said Heyward moved there in May and said she wasn't going to stay long and was looking for another place.

"She was just a regular working girl out there making a living," Dyson said.

Yellow police tape was put up along the door to Heyward's apartment, but there were no officers around at midday Tuesday. A small white teddy bear had been placed outside the apartment.

Hanahan is about 15 miles north of Charleston.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: abortionmurder; childabuse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-71 next last
What the hell is happening to our country?
1 posted on 07/31/2007 6:36:59 PM PDT by aomagrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aomagrat
"She was just a regular working girl out there making a living," Dyson said.

Yeah, right. . .regular working girl who killed her children (deliberate or not) and then stuffed them in GARBAGE bags. That, to me, says it all.

Rest in Peace little ones.
2 posted on 07/31/2007 6:41:23 PM PDT by ninergold3 ("Normal" - Just a cycle on the washing machine - Naomi Judd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat

Those innocent children. It’s mind boggling.


3 posted on 07/31/2007 6:42:38 PM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninergold3

I’m not in any way cutting her a break, she should be prosecuted, etc. But, I’m sure what happened is she thought they would be ok (she’s probably not the smartest bulb in the chandalier) and when she discovered they were dead, she panicked, and tried to hide them. I suspect she does indeed feel regret that they died.
None of that (to me) means she shouldn’t be prosecuted, but I can see how it happened. And she should never ever be allowed to have another child to endanger.
susie


4 posted on 07/31/2007 6:46:27 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat

The problem is that too often child care is not affordable. So low-income working mothers are forced into this type of situation, taking their small children to work and leaving them in the car.

Women in these situations need to give up their children to foster care or adoption so that higher-income people can raise the children.


5 posted on 07/31/2007 6:47:33 PM PDT by Logan1492
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat
"The children's mother, Sametta Heyward, 27, had taken them to work Monday in downtown Charleston and left them in her car all day as the temperature outside rose to 88 degrees, Oliver said."

Here comes the 'Justice Brothers' to DEMAND free child care centers to be provided by every city, every county and every employer.

6 posted on 07/31/2007 6:48:09 PM PDT by Baynative (What if illegal entry into the U.S. was as serious an offense as downloading music files?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat

There’s a lot of information about this incident at the following link:

http://scoop.epluribusmedia.org/story/2007/7/31/153411/700


7 posted on 07/31/2007 6:51:09 PM PDT by Logan1492
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
The problem is that too often child care is not affordable. So low-income working mothers are forced into this type of situation, taking their small children to work and leaving them in the car.

You are, of course, kidding me.

Right?

You got me good on this one.

Right?

8 posted on 07/31/2007 6:51:45 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
The problem is that too often child care is not affordable. So low-income working mothers are forced into this type of situation, taking their small children to work and leaving them in the car.

You are, of course, kidding me.

Right?

You got me good on this one.

Right?

9 posted on 07/31/2007 6:51:52 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492

“The problem is that too often child care is not affordable. So low-income working mothers are forced into this type of situation, taking their small children to work and leaving them in the car.

Women in these situations need to give up their children to foster care or adoption so that higher-income people can raise the children.”

it sure would help if daddy would stick around.


10 posted on 07/31/2007 6:53:18 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat

What the hell is happening to our country?

So what the hell did the SCOTUS approve abortions?
America is in a downward spiral, thanks to all libs!!!


11 posted on 07/31/2007 6:57:11 PM PDT by buck61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

To: Scotswife: Well, if the father leaves, what do you suggest should be done?

The most rational solution is probably this: children ought to be taken out of custody of single working mothers earning less than a living wage, and put in foster homes or given to adoption agencies.

That way, situations like these won’t arise.

The following link has information about the incident.

http://scoop.epluribusmedia.org/story/2007/7/31/153411/700


12 posted on 07/31/2007 6:57:19 PM PDT by Logan1492
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492

I wasn’t trying to dispute what you said, I’m just making an observation.

This past month I’ve been reading heartbreaking story after heartbreaking story.

And the common denominator in most cases is that dads aren’t sticking around.

When dad leaves - terrible things happen.


13 posted on 07/31/2007 7:00:17 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat

Where is the father?


14 posted on 07/31/2007 7:02:32 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
The problem is that too often child care is not affordable. So low-income working mothers are forced into this type of situation, taking their small children to work and leaving them in the car.

The federal government has all types of paid child care for low income people.

15 posted on 07/31/2007 7:02:48 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat

This story doesn’t smell quite right. I can see a 1 year old, but 4 year olds can get themselves out of car seats and out of cars. I’m not sure I’m buying her story.


16 posted on 07/31/2007 7:06:12 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
Went to your site, it doesn’t have jack about this story and it was a waste of time.
17 posted on 07/31/2007 7:06:52 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492

Man, talk about your nanny government! Sound soviet to me.


18 posted on 07/31/2007 7:07:27 PM PDT by blu (All grammar and punctuation rules are *OFF* for the "24" thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

“The federal government has all types of paid child care for low income people.”

If you’re making extremely low income, there’s sometimes government-subsidised child care available. But if you’re making moderately low income, you are often in a bind. You lose the paid child care, but you don’t make enough to afford private child care.


19 posted on 07/31/2007 7:08:18 PM PDT by Logan1492
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
I’m not sure I’m buying her story.

We have a bingo!

20 posted on 07/31/2007 7:08:20 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat

If it were a “clinic sink” rather than an “apartment sink,” it would not have been illegal.


21 posted on 07/31/2007 7:09:21 PM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu
"Man, talk about your nanny government! Sound soviet to me." Exactly. This is why it is important to have a national debate on whether low-income people should at all be allowed to have children. And if you have a child and then become low-income, the child should be taken away and given up for adoption. That may make the state into a jackbooted thug, but that is at least a one-shot thing and definitely better than the nannification of the state into an affordable-child-care provider. Anything is better than that kind of nannification, in fact.
22 posted on 07/31/2007 7:13:52 PM PDT by Logan1492
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492

I’m guessing these cases are more like post birth abortions.


23 posted on 07/31/2007 7:17:50 PM PDT by TheDon (The DemocRAT party is the party of TREASON! Overthrow the terrorist's congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

“Went to your site, it doesn’t have jack about this story and it was a waste of time.”

It’s not *my* site, by the way.

The site is:

http://scoop.epluribusmedia.org/story/2007/7/31/153411/700

And the information is after the “fold”.


24 posted on 07/31/2007 7:18:12 PM PDT by Logan1492
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
Women in these situations need to give up their children to foster care or adoption so that higher-income people can raise the children.

GEEEEZ!!

25 posted on 07/31/2007 7:18:46 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492

“The most rational solution is probably this: children ought to be taken out of custody of single working mothers earning less than a living wage, and put in foster homes or given to adoption agencies.”

To people like you, there’s no problem which can’t be solved by gov’t.

Your solution is ridiculous. FR has been overrun by nanny-staters like you.


26 posted on 07/31/2007 7:21:38 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat
What the hell is happening to our country?

I think this is some of that "new direction" stuff that the 'RATS were pimping prior to the last election.

27 posted on 07/31/2007 7:22:24 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (You know you are a great American when a Kennedy calls you a traitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492

“Well, if the father leaves, what do you suggest should be done?”

Well, they could do what my mom did; she worked three jobs to afford a babysitter. Of course, that would require something like personal responsibility, so it’s probably not really possible.


28 posted on 07/31/2007 7:23:38 PM PDT by Old Student (We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
it sure would help if daddy would stick around.

Stick around? After the free sex?

Why?

29 posted on 07/31/2007 7:25:27 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

“When dad leaves - terrible things happen.”

No disputing that.

But what makes you believe that there was anything other than an anonymous sperm donor in this situation?

Single moms often occur because women get pregnant out of wedlock (which seems to be increasingly socially acceptable).

Many times it has nothing to do with a father not sticking around: they don’t even know who the father is.


30 posted on 07/31/2007 7:28:52 PM PDT by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
But if you’re making moderately low income, you are often in a bind. You lose the paid child care, but you don’t make enough to afford private child care.

Well, it's the same situation if you're making a moderately high income. I don't qualify for ANY government handouts, and I sure as hell can't afford "private child care." That's why my wife and I raise our children. It's much easier to do with a partner, a hard-won bit of wisdom casually discarded by the modern progressive ethos.

31 posted on 07/31/2007 7:29:44 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: webstersII

“The most rational solution is probably this: children ought to be taken out of custody of single working mothers earning less than a living wage, and put in foster homes or given to adoption agencies.”

“To people like you, there’s no problem which can’t be solved by gov’t.”

Adoption is a government solution? How? Last time I checked, private couples adopt, not the government.


32 posted on 07/31/2007 7:30:11 PM PDT by Logan1492
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: csvset

is there no end to man’s inhumanity toward children?


33 posted on 07/31/2007 7:31:16 PM PDT by alfie (peace through superior firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass

“That’s why my wife and I raise our children. It’s much easier to do with a partner, a hard-won bit of wisdom casually discarded by the modern progressive ethos.”

What should those women who have been divorced or widowed do? Any thoughts about this?


34 posted on 07/31/2007 7:32:26 PM PDT by Logan1492
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
I REALLY hope you're just forgetting the /sarc tag.
35 posted on 07/31/2007 7:46:39 PM PDT by blu (All grammar and punctuation rules are *OFF* for the "24" thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: blu

Ignore him, he’s a troll.


36 posted on 07/31/2007 7:47:11 PM PDT by darkangel82 (Socialism is NOT an American value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492

This is the gubmint solution part:

children ought to be taken out of custody of single working mothers

Who did you think would do the “taking”? David Bowie?


37 posted on 07/31/2007 8:00:17 PM PDT by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
What should those women who have been divorced or widowed do? Any thoughts about this?

My grandma was divorced and raised 3 kids on her own, during the depression, in Alabama, when it was MUCH harder than it is today for a woman to make a living. Somehow she managed without neglecting or abusing her kids. Get a grip, buddy.

38 posted on 07/31/2007 8:01:36 PM PDT by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
What should those women who have been divorced or widowed do? Any thoughts about this?

What should they do? How the hell should I know? Make do the best they can, I guess. Count on family or friends. join a church and contribute to a church community? What they would get in return would astound them.

Is YOUR only solution to run to the government?

39 posted on 07/31/2007 8:02:46 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat

The culture of abortion rears its ugly head (again)...


40 posted on 07/31/2007 8:07:15 PM PDT by Joan912 (Your spies came clean, they told me everything...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492; Old Sarge; admin

We have a troll here.


41 posted on 07/31/2007 8:07:45 PM PDT by darkangel82 (Socialism is NOT an American value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
"This is why it is important to have a national debate on whether low-income people should at all be allowed to have children."

You posting from party headquarters in red china?

"And if you have a child and then become low-income, the child should be taken away and given up for adoption."

Are you a former official from the Pol Pot regime that escaped prosecution?

42 posted on 07/31/2007 8:11:33 PM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat

I can’t imagine what the little girls went through. One of them dies, and the other one is crying for her sister’s death, and then she fades away. I’ve got two baby girls, and I can’t even “go there” in my thinking. How very, very sad.


43 posted on 07/31/2007 8:38:30 PM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492

Women in these situations need to give up their children to foster care or adoption so that higher-income people can raise the children.”
_____________________
No, women in these situations need to be neutered.


44 posted on 07/31/2007 8:42:49 PM PDT by cowdog77 (" Are there any brave men left in Washington, or are they all cowards?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Responsibility for ones actions. Simple.


45 posted on 07/31/2007 8:51:27 PM PDT by CTSeditor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
"... on whether low-income people should at all be allowed to have children."

I'm going to give you credit here and just assume you're making a bad joke.

This isn't red china. It's America.

Americans of any economic circumstances are free to have as many children as they want. They are also responsible for every last decision they make.

There are no excuses for leaving children in a death trap like a hot car. And no government has any business telling Americans whether they can produce and raise children.

46 posted on 07/31/2007 9:28:39 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
>>The problem is that too often child care is not affordable. So low-income working mothers are forced into this type of situation, taking their small children to work and leaving them in the car.<<

Investigators found a note Heyward left at her apartment, explaining that she had arranged for a baby sitter, but when plans fell through she took the children with her in the car to work in downtown Charleston Townhall.com

This sounds less like a case of not being able to afford child care and more like a case where the baby sitter didn't show.

47 posted on 07/31/2007 9:34:12 PM PDT by Between the Lines (I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
Women in these situations need to give up their children to foster care or adoption so that higher-income people can raise the children.

Yes, child neglect and child abuse are crimes that exist only amongst the poor. We must remove these children now. / sarc

48 posted on 07/31/2007 9:48:01 PM PDT by Between the Lines (I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Logan1492
I don’t see what that link is suppose to prove. Even if she had never lost her home, she still would have to go to work and I assume she might still have left her children in the car.

By the way, if I was in the position where I could not come up with $169 I would make damn sure I didn't get pregnant.

49 posted on 07/31/2007 9:49:32 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

“This sounds less like a case of not being able to afford child care and more like a case where the baby sitter didn’t show.”

As

http://scoop.epluribusmedia.org/story/2007/7/31/153411/700

writes:

“At the previous minimum wage, she would have brought home $206/week before taxes. She had a 60x14 ft. mobile home, but she didn’t have the $169.75 to pay the taxes on it and it was sold by Charleston County. If she was lucky, she got a respectable one-bedroom apartment for $590/month. That works out to $136.15 per week in rent, leaving her $69.85 per week for ALL OTHER EXPENSES - food - utilities - phone - gas - car - insurance - clothes - for her and her two children. Even if she qualified for and received state and Federal assistance for these expenses, under $70 a week is not enough money to pay for child care for a 1- and 4-year old.

“I picture her asking friends, family, neighbors to help out with her two children. I picture those people helping her whenever they could. But there came a day when no one was available to watch these two kids. Sametta couldn’t take them into work with her, and she couldn’t leave them alone. She didn’t figure it would be so hot that day, and she knew tht if she didn’t show up for work - at best - she would lose a day’s work and money to eat; and, at worst - she would lose the job entirely. So she figured that leaving the kids in the car was the only option she had. And so she did.

“I repeat: this is just speculation on my part. It’s difficult to envision a rational person leaving her two young children in a car period, et alone during the summertime in South Carolina. I’m not defending leaving chidren in cars. I’m not defending even the mildest form of neglect of child.

“But let’s face it - these kinds of trade-offs are going on every day (and right this moment) in America. Despite the incessant touting of our “strong economy”, the number of people and particularly children below the poverty level is growing. Real wages are not growing. The cost of living is growing. More people, and particularly children, are going without basic health care.

“So I ask you: are the Sametta’s of this world simply bad parents or are they being placed in positions where a bad choice is their best option? “


50 posted on 07/31/2007 9:54:51 PM PDT by Logan1492
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson