Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A river regained
Tacoma News Tribune ^ | 8/18/2007 | JEFFREY P. MAYOR

Posted on 08/18/2007 5:10:53 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP

A river regained

JEFFREY P. MAYOR; The News Tribune PORT ANGELES – Floating down the Elwha River on Thursday, Robert Elofson nodded his head in appreciation.

A trio of harlequin ducks skittered across the river’s tumbling surface as they took off. Downstream, a handful of mergansers quietly dozed, ignoring the three rafts drifting by their riverside roost.

Rings on the river’s surface marked the occasional rise of a trout as it slurped in a bug for a midday meal.

With the Elwha River already a remarkable outdoors experience for kayakers, rafters and anglers, Elofson believes it will become so much more when the two dams that impede its journey to the Strait of Juan de Fuca are removed.

He’s in a position to know. Now the river restoration director for the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, he has been involved in the effort to remove the Elwha and Glines Canyon dams since 1992.

Elofson was among a group, including Olympic National Park staff members and members of the National Park Conservation Association, on an afternoon float meant to show what the river could be like when the dams are removed and the lakes behind them drained.

REMOVING THE DAMS

When the river flows freely from its headwaters in the Olympic Mountains 45 miles to the strait, the focus will shift to restoring runs of 10 species of fish, including all five Pacific salmon stocks and steelhead.

But the impact will extend beyond the riverbanks.

Port Angeles will have a new water-treatment plant, eliminating the $1 million the city spends annually to protect its current plant. The contract for that project, estimated at $15 million to $25 million, could be awarded within the next week.

Another project, estimated at $60 million to $80 million, will improve flood protection and build an Elwha water-treatment plant. That contract should be awarded late this fall, said Brian Winter, project manager for the park.

Overall, the $185 million dams project could mean an estimated $96.8 million in business spending and 1,650 construction jobs, producing $51.5 million in personal income, according to projections.

Studies also predict increased recreational use, tourism and fishing will add $355 million to the local economy over the next 100 years.

Once the construction contracts are awarded, officials will have a better sense of when the dam removal will begin, Winter said. It’s scheduled to begin in 2009 and take two to three years.

“Right now we’re focusing on the water mitigation contracts,” Winter said. “Once we get those awarded and construction timetables set, we’ll reassess the dam removal timetable.”

When that happens, the river will flow freely as it once did almost 100 years ago.

The project is not without its risks.

Along a side channel sit several historic buildings at the Elwha ranger station.

“There are no plans to move the buildings,” said Pat Crain, a fisheries biologist for the park. “And armoring the bank with rocks runs counter to the intent to restore the natural environment.”

Also lost will be the recreational fisheries in Lake Adwell, behind the Elwha dam, and in Lake Mills, behind the Glines Canyon dam.

REBUILDING THE RUNS

Yet if plans to restore salmon, steelhead and trout populations come to fruition, those lost fishing opportunities will be negligible.

Right now, 5,000 to 10,000 salmon return to the river. But the fish have just the lower five miles in which to spawn before reaching the Elwha Dam. Officials said 22 species of wildlife, including bald eagles, black bears and river otters, have declined because of a lack of salmon carcasses in the upper river.

Removing the dams will give fish access to more than 70 miles of habitat.

The goal, Elofson said, is to produce runs that reach 400,000 fish.

“I think it’s doable,” he said. “Eighty-seven percent of the drainage is in the park, so that habitat is protected.”

The state will concentrate on restoring chinook runs, while the tribe concentrates on coho, chum, pink salmon and steelhead. Fish eggs, fry and yearlings will be planted upstream to build new runs.

Restoring runs to such levels will take time, likely between 12 and 30 years, Elofson said.

“I’m hoping it will happen as fast as the Toutle (River) rebounded after Mount St. Helens erupted,” he said. “I’d just love it if it took just a couple of runs.”

As for when fishing, recreational and commercial, will be allowed, that’s another matter. Crain said the state and the tribe have agreed not to fish for the first five years after the dams come down.

“The primary objective is to restore the salmon runs to the Elwha,” Crain said. “Fishing will be secondary.”

Looking to the future, Crain cites the South Fork of the Skykomish River as an example. A fish passage was built around Sunset Falls, and now the watershed is a healthy ecosystem.

“In 10 to 15 years, I think we’ll see fish throughout the watershed,” Crain said, referring to the Elwha. “In 50 years, I think you’ll see something similar to what existed before the dams went in.”

As the group neared the takeout, Elofson said every dollar that has been spent, every meeting attended, every document written and reviewed has been worth it:

“I wouldn’t want to tell my kids we had the chance to restore this river and we didn’t take it.”

About the project

The river: The Elwha River flows 45 miles from its source on the flanks of 6,480-foot Mount Queets and 5,993-foot Mount Barnes inside Olympic National Park to the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Historically it has been home to runs of five Pacific salmon species and steelhead.

The dams: When the 108-foot-tall Elwha Dam and 210-foot-tall Glines Canyon Dam were built, they supplied electricity to Port Angeles. They now supply 15 percent of the power to the Daishowa America Co. paper mill in Port Angeles. The dams have no fish passages, so their construction left just 5 miles of the lower river for spawning.

The plan: A diversion channel will be built to drain Lake Adwell behind the Elwha Dam. Crews then will blast part the dam. The Glines Canyon Dam will be removed by cutting it into sections 71/2-feet-long and weighing 22 tons. Lake Mills, behind the dam, will be drained through the existing outlet pipe. The mill will get its power from the Bonneville Power Administration.

The result: Salmon, steelhead and trout would have access to more than 70 miles of habitat in the river and its tributaries. According to projections, removing the dams would produce about 400,000 salmon and steelhead in about 30 years, compared with fewer than 50,000 fish if the dams were fitted with upstream and downstream fish passages. Right now, 5,000 to 10,000 salmon spawn in the river between the Elwha dam and the strait. elwha through the years

1913: Elwha Dam completed.

1927: Glines Canyon Dam completed.

1992: Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act becomes law. It directs the secretary of the Interior to study ways to restore the Elwha River ecosystem and native anadromous fish.

1994: The Interior Department’s Elwha Report concludes that removing the dams is the best alternative.

November 1996: The first environmental impact statement is completed and calls for removal of the dams.

February 2000: The dams are bought from the Fort James Corp. for $29.5 million.

July 2005: A final supplement environmental impact statement is issued.

October 2005: The National Parks Service issues its decision calling for the removal.

2009: Removing the dams could begin and be completed in two to three years.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: elwha; environment; libertarianizethegop; salmon; water

1 posted on 08/18/2007 5:10:54 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP
The mill will get its power from the Bonneville Power Administration.

Yes, and where will Bonneville Power get its power? I'll bet these are the same folks that don't want any power plants near them. And nukes? No way, anywhere.

2 posted on 08/18/2007 5:58:12 PM PDT by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertina; acoulterfan; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; NurdlyPeon; RainMan; Maynerd; ...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
Say WA? Evergreen State ping

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.

Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.

3 posted on 08/18/2007 6:07:37 PM PDT by sionnsar (trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP
There are several reasons for the depletion of the salmon runs in Washington State:

1) Natives have an unlimited finishing allowance and can fish for salmon ALL YEAR LONG and catch AS MANY AS THEY WANT. I’ve seen native fishing boats as a child setting nets up along the salmon spawning runs and this depletes the stocks significantly.

2) The State won’t shoot the damn sealions that camp outside the locks killing the salmon waiting to get up the fish ladders.

3) Militant environmentalists.

4 posted on 08/18/2007 8:23:59 PM PDT by Duke Phelan (Save the cheerleader, save the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T. P. Pole; Duke Phelan
Having lived in Port Angeles in the mid 90', I am familiar with the plans to remove the dams. However, this was only loosely contemplated back then.

Removing the dams on the Elwh is basically a test concept for removing the dams on the Columbia. The Elwha river runs right through the middle of Olympic national park, which is pretty big. As such, there are no other man-made barriers or sources of pollution to interfere with the return of the salmon.

As much as I like Salmon, I hope this fails miserably in bringing them back.. If it fails, then the wacko pressure to remove all the dams on the Columbia river will subside. Although I am sure there a few nuts out there who would still think we need to remove the dams even without any hope of salmon recovery. If this experiment on the Elwha does succeed, there will be considerable pressure to remove all the dams on the Columbia.

I like how the article minimized the impact of the loss of electricity that will occur with the dam removal. I don't know how the environmentalist resolve this with the fact that hydro electric power does not contribute to (alleged man made) global warming

5 posted on 08/19/2007 11:48:24 PM PDT by eeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Thanks for the WA state pings


6 posted on 08/19/2007 11:50:24 PM PDT by eeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson