Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Canada Become the 51st State?
The Vancouver Sun ^ | August 18, 2007 | By Kelly Patterson - CanWest News Service

Posted on 08/19/2007 6:40:35 PM PDT by JACKRUSSELL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: JACKRUSSELL

We could do a lot worse than including Alberta as a 51st state.


41 posted on 08/19/2007 7:59:24 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL

Headline makes no sense — if this idea ever went forward it could not be that all of Canada would come in as one “51st state” — there would be at least 10 new states based upon current provinces.... but there would be great controversy about allotting 2 US Senators to the most sparsely populated provinces such as PEI, Nova Scotia, Yukon, etc. I see that the website does not allot senators to some of those entities, but it would be highly controversial either way.

I cannot see most people on either side of the border going for this, but who knows? As a US citizen with some Canadian ancestry I am not automatically averse to the idea, but it could be terrible if it merely cemented rampant socialism north and south, and that seems to be the most likely outcome.


42 posted on 08/19/2007 8:02:20 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Nah. Since the majority of the country uses the English units, we’d make the Albertans use ‘em too.


43 posted on 08/19/2007 8:08:19 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (From my fist to Harry Reid's face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mhx

Give ‘em Massachusetts too.


44 posted on 08/19/2007 8:10:36 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (From my fist to Harry Reid's face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
Toss in San Francisco for Vancouver as well.

No, Vancouver sucks. It's like Seattle north. We'll give them San Fransisco for Saskatchewan.
45 posted on 08/19/2007 8:14:29 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (From my fist to Harry Reid's face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

What is the SPP?


46 posted on 08/19/2007 8:17:35 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (“Jesus Saves. Moses Delivers. Cthulu Reposesses...”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
It is the Security and Prosperity Partnership, a sprawling effort to forge closer ties among the three nations in everything from anti-terrorism measures to energy strategies to food-safety and pesticide rules.

Think European Community but for North America.

We all know where that ended up.

47 posted on 08/19/2007 8:24:15 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * U.Va. Engineering '09 * Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat * Fred in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: antiunion person

There are only 33 million Canadians. Their strain on our medical system wouldn’t be that huge. Plus Canada has a wealth of natural resources. Oil, wood, hydropower, metals, hockey.


48 posted on 08/19/2007 8:25:04 PM PDT by CollegeRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

go Flames!


49 posted on 08/19/2007 8:30:07 PM PDT by Disciplinemisanthropy (...and that, friends, is what grinds my gears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL

I really like you...as a friend.


50 posted on 08/19/2007 8:31:27 PM PDT by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSES
Actually, I can think of some rather nice "Trades" of States for Provinces!

I'd trade Alberta,Yukon and the NW Terr. for everything east of the Hudson River. I'd throw in King County, WA for all of BC except metro Vancouver.

51 posted on 08/19/2007 8:34:49 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
It is confusing, isn’t it? Pretty soon all the Americans will be overseas, and all the foreigners will be here.

I share that funny ironic sarcasm, but where overseas can we go?

Thinking Iceland, where we are safe from Algore - but wait - all that geothermal activity, we're doomed!

52 posted on 08/19/2007 9:06:24 PM PDT by quantim (The U.S. 110th Congress is the first duly elected 'Politburo' of the new millennium.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL

Turning Canada or Mexico into States would require (A) giving them considerable representation in our Congress and presidential elections.

AND (B) they would have to vote to become states. Meanwhile our own sovereign status is crumbling.


53 posted on 08/19/2007 9:28:58 PM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

The idea of Canada becoming a state (one or many) is silly.


54 posted on 08/19/2007 9:31:57 PM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ExSES

As long as Northwest Territories makes the cut, I am in.


55 posted on 08/19/2007 9:38:03 PM PDT by Xenophon450 (They say it's lonely at the top, then I am as lonely as can be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kanawa; Springman; GMMAC; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; Ryle; ...

56 posted on 08/20/2007 5:32:52 AM PDT by fanfan ("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL

If we can have our choice, can we just take Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba? Leave the liberal part to Britain.


57 posted on 08/20/2007 5:34:41 AM PDT by CholeraJoe ("Is the lion burning?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin; JACKRUSSELL
There is nothing wrong with adding new states. Nothing says that the USA is limited to 50 states.

Each of Candada's provinces would make great states of our union. Except for a few historic events, they might have already been brought in.

58 posted on 08/20/2007 5:36:42 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
Can we take in Alberta and forget the rest?

Be careful what you wish for Sionnsar. They just voted to remove support the troops signs from city vehicles in Calgary.

59 posted on 08/20/2007 5:41:58 AM PDT by fanfan ("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: svcw
Will Canada Become the 51st State?

I thought they already were.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Nah! Russia's got first dibs.

They planted a flag up North to prove it. Thats more than the USA has done since the War of 1812.

60 posted on 08/20/2007 6:02:30 AM PDT by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson