Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thompson's Health (Hugh Hewitt's Obsession With This...)
Townhall ^ | September 06, 2007 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 09/06/2007 8:27:27 AM PDT by jdm

September 6, 2007

Posted by: Hugh Hewitt  at 9:55 AM

The most comprehensive report on Fred Thompson's cancer I have seen is here.  (HT: Politico.)  Key graphs:

``The nature of the disease is that it tends to relapse,'' said David Fisher, a lymphoma specialist and assistant professor of medicine at Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. ``How long one can live with the disease varies considerably.'' ...

Thompson's cancer is an uncommon form called nodal marginal zone lymphoma, which accounts for 2 percent to 4 percent of all cases, according to Owen O'Connor, chief of the lymphoma service at Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center in New York and author of about 100 research papers on the disease....

``Because this is so rare -- there are about 1,500 cases per year in the U.S. -- it's hard to prognosticate,'' O'Connor said in an interview. ``Most of the statistics you see on the National Cancer Institute Web site are old data. It's very hard to reach broad generalizations.''

Thompson's doctor, Bruce Cheson, head of hematology and oncology at Georgetown University Hospital in Washington, told CNN in April that his patient had no evidence of the disease after being treated and that many such patients ``can live a normal life span.''

``The indolent, or slow-growing lymphomas are very treatable, but rarely if ever curable,'' Cheson said in the April interview. ``Therefore, his likelihood of recurring is high, but this may not happen for a number of years.''

Cheson couldn't comment further because Thompson hasn't given permission for him to do so, Georgetown Medical School spokeswoman Marianne Worley said in a Sept. 4 interview. Thompson's campaign representatives didn't return phone calls seeking comment. ....

The textbook average life expectancy for all forms of non- Hodgkin's lymphoma is six to 12 years after diagnosis. Among patients diagnosed with Stage 1, or cancer that hasn't spread, the average 10-year survival rate is about 70 percent, Fisher said. For those diagnosed with extensive cancers, the 10-year survival rate is 36 percent. It is not known at what stage Thompson's cancer was diagnosed.



TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cancer; elections; fredthompson; hughhewitt; lymphoma
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: jdm

Has Thompson’s entire political career consisted of just two years in the U.S. Senate?


21 posted on 09/06/2007 9:02:08 AM PDT by Irene Adler (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
Hugh is so vested in Romney that he really is losing credibility. Sad to see....

I've been a big fan for a long time, but it's getting so I can't trust anything Hugh says concerning the presidential race. SO disappointing.

22 posted on 09/06/2007 9:02:29 AM PDT by inkling (exurbanleague.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Does anyone actually think Thompson looks healthy and strong or are we all seeing something else and no one wants to say it?

I suppose it could just be my bias since I’m a Hunter supporter but my eyes are usually pretty trustworthy.

23 posted on 09/06/2007 9:02:44 AM PDT by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
Actually I think he was just to lazy to get treatment and figured, “Hey, I am going back to DC were the dead run things anyways, what the hell!”
24 posted on 09/06/2007 9:03:55 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Perchant

He has just been through a battle with cancer and is comming back, not going back, it will wear on even a younger man. But he is working out and getting back in shape. Give him some time.


25 posted on 09/06/2007 9:05:37 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: inkling

Re#22 Exactly.


26 posted on 09/06/2007 9:08:31 AM PDT by eureka! (Is power so important to the Democrats that they are willing to betray our country? Sadly, yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Why all the deflecting of this issue of Thompson's cancer?

It was the first thing Fred Thompson made public when he started his "testing the waters" phase.

Thompson thinks it is important and his supporters need a better response to the issue than try to tear down anybody who brings up the subject.

This issue will get A LOT of attention from the media and most assuredly the Democrats so there needs to be compelling responses and not just calling the questioner a "poopy head."
27 posted on 09/06/2007 9:17:02 AM PDT by elizabetty (Ron Paul - Because Moonbats Need Choices Too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irene Adler
Fred was a Sen from 94-2003

Fred Dalton Thompson (born August 19, 1942 as Freddie Dalton Thompson[1]) is an American politician, lawyer, lobbyist, and character actor. He represented Tennessee as a Republican in the U.S. Senate from 1994 through 2003.

28 posted on 09/06/2007 9:17:09 AM PDT by Hazcat (We won an immigration BATTLE, the WAR is not over. Be ever vigilant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Perchant

I am also a huge Hunter fan. He always sounds great in the debates. Last night he barely got a question. I am torn about Thompson, agree with you that he just doesn’t look well. Does he just look old compared to other candidates or are we used to seeing him in full makeup on Law and Order?
I am interested to see Fred in action now that he is in.


29 posted on 09/06/2007 9:19:22 AM PDT by 2rightsleftcoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Irene Adler

Obama is the one with the two year stint.

Fred was elected twice, once to fill the term of Algore in 1994, then a full term in 1996 for six years. He could have run one more term but didn’t because of Betsey and other things. He believes in term limits and took himself out of the picture, like George Washington did.

He was also a prosecutor and has done other work for the government. He’s been on a committee to advise the secretary of state until he started this campaign. He had a high security clearance. Plus working on the staff of the watergate committee. Worked on the John Roberts nomination. Worked as an unpaid staffer for several political campaigns. Founded a Young Republican group in his hometown.


30 posted on 09/06/2007 9:21:24 AM PDT by hoosierpearl (To God be the glory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

I heard he died because he was too lazy to breathe....

Or didn’t have time to breathe because he’s been working too many jobs at the same time...

But it’s okay, its a CFR conspiracy, they have to practice life support on someone.


31 posted on 09/06/2007 9:24:20 AM PDT by hoosierpearl (To God be the glory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jdm
I have concerns about Fred's health as well, especially considering the heavy toll being President can exact upon a person.

Having said that, however, I trust his Doctor's assessment of his condition and his ability to handle the job.

Fred will be a GREAT President.
32 posted on 09/06/2007 9:27:54 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elizabetty

Fred put his health issue out there first, because people wanted him to run. He didn’t think it was a problem, but practiced full disclosure on this so people could make up their own minds. I admire how he handled it.

If it was a problem, people could have brought it up before when he first disclosed. Some did, many did not.

It is a judgment call for everyone involved as many people go in remission, and often it never comes back. I have a dear friend who was a cancer patient and is doing well forty years later. You never know and hope for the best.

That said, some will use it against him no matter what. This has been discussed rather thoroughly. A person needs a little humor in this grim world.


33 posted on 09/06/2007 9:30:35 AM PDT by hoosierpearl (To God be the glory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

On the contrary, the autopsy said that the cause of death was a 3 alarm belly fire, caused by eating a chili dog at the county fair. Apparently the onions were too much for old, sick, Fred and he keeled over sometime after.

Kudos to those CFR reanimators on an excellent job of reanimating Fred!


34 posted on 09/06/2007 9:34:11 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Do you know that if Hillary had sex with Bill Clinton she could become mentally ill from a venereal disease.


35 posted on 09/06/2007 9:37:48 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ( An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping that it will eat him last..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perchant

He looks healthy and strong to me.


36 posted on 09/06/2007 9:39:27 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Anyone can die, any minute, on any given day. If you are President, this is what VPs are for ......... so to Fred: pick a good one and to Hugh: MOVE ON!


37 posted on 09/06/2007 9:48:31 AM PDT by MissMagnolia (Democrats can't win unless America loses & their definition of "fairness" is equal misery for all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Like it or not, on the subject of electability, Fred Thompson's health is a real issue and must be addressed seriously if he is to have any chance of winning the general election.

People know he battled cancer. Therefore, people are understandably concerned about his ability to serve out a four-year term.

Until voters are convinced his cancer is not an issue, it will remain an issue. His opponents—on both sides—will make sure it remains an issue.

The last thing we should want to see is for the so-called "11th Commandment" to be in force during the primaries, only to have our nominee's chances quickly go up in smoke in the general election because Republicans were "too polite" to bring up such issues when we had the chance.

Rather than excoriate any of our fellow lib-haters who would dare to bring up the "C" word and Sen. Thompson, I see this as an opportunity to deal with it now, while there's still plenty of time to find out which antidotes work and which do not.

38 posted on 09/06/2007 9:51:29 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Of the worst kind...HH is a big Arnold and Riordan supporter too.


39 posted on 09/06/2007 9:53:15 AM PDT by Fred (Democrat Party - "The Nadir of Nihilism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul; Mia T; Peach; EaglesTalon; FairOpinion

Scumbag ghoul pinglist.


40 posted on 09/06/2007 9:53:21 AM PDT by Petronski (Cleveland Indians: Pennant -17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson