Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eagles Talon IV

Yesterday I saw a documentary where it was said that nuclear plants was not the answer: we need 10 000 plants to sustain the amount of energy we currently are consuming - and with that many plants we would drain the world’s uranium resources in 2 decades.

I believe you are right that there is a technological sollution to this - it could be cold fusion, it could be solar power, but my point is that the transition will come gradually, we won’t end up in a mad max scenario over night.


22 posted on 09/17/2007 8:38:08 AM PDT by Kurt_Hectic (Trust only what you see, not what you hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Kurt_Hectic

Probably right. What could also happen is the discovery of a power source heretofore not even considered. An example is the radiation of salt water by microwaves which is said to actually cause the water (or the salt) to burn, giving off heat and of course energy. Of course you need electricity to generate the microwaves so who knows how efficient this will be.


28 posted on 09/18/2007 5:05:03 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson