Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google bans Anti-MoveOn.Org Ads(Heil Hillary-No Dissent Will Be Tolerated!)
The Examiner ^ | 10-11-07 | Robert Cox

Posted on 10/11/2007 9:22:05 AM PDT by tcrlaf

WASHINGTON- Internet giant Google has banned advertisements critical of, the far-left advocacy group that caused a national uproar last month when it received preferential treatment from The New York Times for its “General Betray Us” message.

The ads banned by Google were placed by a firm working for Republican Sen. Susan Collins’ re-election campaign. Collins is seeking her third term. Earlier this week, Google told Lance Dutson, president of Maine Coast Designs, that the ads he placed for Collins had been removed and would not be allowed to resume because they violated Google’s trademark policy.

Google’s Web site states, “Google takes allegations of trademark infringement very seriously and, as a courtesy, we’re happy to investigate matters raised by trademark owners.” That suggests Google acted in response to a complaint by

The banned advertisements said, “Susan Collins is MoveOn’s primary target. Learn how you can help” and “Help Susan Collins stand up to the money machine.” The ads linked to Collins’ campaign Web site with a headline reading “ has made Susan Collins their #1 target.”

The Collins Web site claims that MoveOn has contributed $250,000 to her likely Democratic opponent and has run nine ads against her costing nearly $1 million. The Web site also displays’s controversial “General Betray Us” ad.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: achillwind; ads; alreadyposted; boycottgoogle; censorship; collins; democratparty; doasearch; duplicatepost; fundedbysoros; google; googleconscensor; googlessp; howtostealanelection; moveon; moveonorg; shadowparty; soros; stalinisttactics; susancollins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: tcrlaf
I'm torn.

Living in the People's Republic of Maine and having to put up with the embarrassment known as Susan Collins and despising the commies who run Google is not good for the blood pressure.

41 posted on 10/11/2007 1:07:00 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Even the 9th Circus says it’s not a trademark infringement.

The article also points out the hypocrisy of, as they name drop corporations all the time. Someone needs to fight fire with fire.

42 posted on 10/11/2007 2:51:08 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (Fight the illegal Mexican colonizers & imperialist conquistadors! Long live the resistance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

AlGore is a Google board member.

43 posted on 10/11/2007 2:59:59 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Here are some good search alternatives to Google. These will all go in FireFox search bar. Probably IE too, but I don’t use IE. they have image, video, MP3 Audio and news searches too.

If Google does not like our politics and values lets go elsewhere.

44 posted on 10/11/2007 4:34:42 PM PDT by free_life (Pro God is Pro life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

boycott Google.

45 posted on 10/11/2007 4:51:45 PM PDT by WOSG (I just wish freepers would bash Democrats as much as they bash Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

“I thought the use of the “Betray-Us” ad featuring their logo was the trademark violation. If it’s just the use of the name at issue, then of course it’s insane.”

Even if the ad were used, it is ‘fair use’. Political discourse can’t be supressed over brand identity.

Trademarks were established so businesses could protect themselves from similar sounding (or identical) copycats. That is a far cry from the issue here.

46 posted on 10/11/2007 5:39:23 PM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan

Dogpile has been mine for = leftist traitors

47 posted on 10/11/2007 5:44:01 PM PDT by Right_Rev ("We need to get back to winning arguments by our ideas, not our ability to call people names.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

I thought they had a reasonable out, given the cost of fighting in court against a political ally. Legal issues come up when someone threatens litigation — frivolous or otherwise — which they seem to be implying.

But... I was wrong. A lot of people don’t find it reasonable and the story’s getting traction. I hate Google anyway, so I’m fine with that.

48 posted on 10/11/2007 7:57:14 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Use Dogpile. Tell a friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson