Skip to comments.Zogby Poll: Half Say They Would Never Vote for Hillary Clinton for President
Posted on 10/20/2007 11:22:06 AM PDT by keepitreal
While she is winning wide support in nationwide samples among Democrats in the race for their partys presidential nomination, half of likely voters nationwide said they would never vote for New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, a new Zogby Interactive poll shows.
The online survey of 9,718 likely voters nationwide showed that 50% said Clinton would never get their presidential vote. This is up from 46% who said they could never vote for Clinton in a Zogby International telephone survey conducted in early March. Older voters are most resistant to Clinton 59% of those age 65 and older said they would never vote for the New York senator, but she is much more acceptable to younger voters: 42% of those age 1829 said they would never vote for Clinton for President.
(Excerpt) Read more at zogby.com ...
Didn’t stop Beezelbubba either time which should make us more nervous than them.
And this from the left leaning Zogby Polls? Interesting.
Her hubby won with 43% of the vote.
Third party candidate at that time. Talk of the same this time based on who gets the Republican nomination. That’s Hillary’s ticket...
She does not need 50% of the votes to win. She just has to carry the right states.
Time for the Clintons to dig up a third party candidate.
What I’ve been saying for year...the Shrew is unelectable in a national election. Let’s hope she gets the Dem nomination.
Hard to win when 50% of the voters will NEVER vote for you!
Yes, but rats have their ways of finding, make that waking up, the needed votes.
True, but I’m not sure that I believe the poll. Zogby isn’t above lying to us in hopes that the Right will lower its guard against advancement of the Antichrist.
We’ve just got to work hard to nominate a conservative. Iowa and New Hampshire are just around the corner. It’s time to stop worrying and time to start using the same energy we used to kill the amnesty bill into supporting conservative candidates. In my case it’s Thompson.
That's what everyone was saying about Bill Clinton in 1991.
Wait til the Clintons lure a third-party candidate like Ross Perot into the race - - then she won’t need 51% of the votes.
Wait till they hear her stump speeches every night on the news shrieking with that voice that makes you want to jab icepicks into your ear drums.
Perhaps Zogby still holds Hillary's vote for the war against her.
“That’s what everyone was saying about Bill Clinton in 1991.”
A valid point but she does not have near the charm that Bubba did. That said, a third party candidate with a following like Perot’s is still a scary thought.
Unless it’s Al Gore.
Oh well there are a host of illegals who will overcome that 50%. No well will be left untapped.
All the more reason why the GOP must not choose Rudy Guliani, and instead opt for Romney, Thompson ... or ?
I wholeheartedly believe the mushy middle will support Romney the most, and Thompson to a lesser extent -- rather than vote for a shrill quasi communist like Hillary.
“Unless its Al Gore.”
Hisortically, I just don’t get that lucky. ;)
Exactly . She needs to pick off a Red state somewhere . I look for her to put a Red stater on the ticket , perhaps from Virginia or Ohio .
Especially that stump speech where she tells everyone they’re fat!
WASHINGTON - Hey, Tubby, step away from the Big Mac!
That would be the message from a President Hillary Clinton, who suggested Thursday that Americans are roaming eating machines whose belt-busting habits are adding to the country’s health woes.
“People now eat all day long,” said Sen. Clinton (D-N.Y.), comparing habits now to her childhood. “We had three meals a day. [Now] people walk down the street, they eat in their cars - they eat everywhere.”
I will point it out again. The men that are left in the US need to rally on this one.
Do not try to beat this woman by giving up all you believe in and accept a liberal male.
Stand up and fight her by standing for family and the security of the US, otherwise you will lose to a nanny state liberal whether there is a D or an R before their name.
And then there's the Clinton Cackle:
Can you imagine having to listen to President Hillary for the next 8 years?
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
We did get luck with Reagan in 1980 though. Who was it John Anderson, a liberal republican that ran for president that year? I though he got 10% of the vote and Reagan still beat Carter by 10 points.
As for Gore I don’t think he’ll run either. If Nader ran and got 2 0r 3% of the vote that would be something at least. And He might if the anti-war left loses faith in Hillary.
This is why she must “Perot” the election.
Clinton can still get elected. Obviously, this poll did NOT sample dead voters - they don't answer the phone, and they don't respond much to surveys. But they do vote, and will vote in large turnouts for Hillary!.
I thought for a minute that I was reading The Onion. I haven't laughed so loud at a line in a serious news report in a long time.
I think this explains why the liberal media have been covering Hillary's financial scandals so much. They don't think she can win in the general election. But if she does get nominated, they will surely clam up.
Not when self-important idiots like Dobson talk about backing a 3rd Party candidate. Combine that with the sanctimonious single-issue voter getting ready to “send another message” and you get Hitlery the First, Primer of the Peoples Socialist Collective of America.
People now eat all day long, said Sen. Clinton (D-N.Y.), comparing habits now to her childhood. We had three meals a day. [Now] people walk down the street, they eat in their cars - they eat everywhere.
If she keeps this up, she is going to lose the fat vote.
“Approximately 23 percent of Americans are obese. An additional 36 percent are overweight.”
Yep, better not alienate 59% of the population!
I’ve been trying to stay upbeat, but if she does win, there may never be another conservative in the white house. Everything that goes wrong in her first term will be blamed on Bush, she will start wars for political purposes, so she’ll most likely be re-elected. By 2016 the 20 million illegals, millions of convicted felons, will be given the right to vote. So I don’t see how having her in the white house is a positive for the conservative cause.
If every single person who voted for John Anderson in 1980 had instead voted for “the incumbent” (not likely), Ronald Reagan would still have won both the popular and electoral vote.
That is why we need to not vote for any 3rd party candidate, not matter what. If a third party does start to promote a conservative Christian, be warned, the Reform Party was ran by liberal homosexuals from San Fransico, though many thought it was just about Perot, it was a big front. It was Clinton’s people all along, and I suspect that it will be Clinton’s people again should a “Christian Conservative” decide to run on a third party ticket.
Her national negatives have always been above 50%. Her fellow RATS are in fear of their lives if they mention it.
“All the more reason why the GOP must not choose Rudy Guliani, and instead opt for Romney, Thompson ... or ?”
I agree with you, we could be being fooled into picking Rudy because the Clinton people know that this will cause a back-lash. So people need to be smart and refuse to vote for Rudy at all, even though he has some good qualities, it’s not enough to be elected President as a Republcian, we can’t have a pro-abortion candidate, no matter how good they sound, because it will only cause a 3rd party, despite warnings to Chrisitans, people will not listen. So we must understand that.
They will dig up the votes somewhere.
She did say that “we” will have to take things away from you for the common good.Like your dinner.What next,the Food Police?
perfectly electable with the proper application of revolutionary politics through staging off noose intimidation and other race and class baiting schemes. The party being led by Hillary Clinton and Rahm Emmanuel know all about revolutionary politics.
In this instance it would be the wrong states.
I am really tired of having the socialistic fascists in power in this country. They have monopolized the educational systems and almost entirely eliminated any libertarian or conservative thought as racist or intolerant.
They have successfully taken over the schools and are indoctrinating the youth. We are doomed if we do not take it back.
1) We know that conservative leaning people are usually under-represented in polls (not sure if that's as true for the "interactives" as for telephone), so the actual percentage could be much higher.
2)I believe there's a fair amount of the public who normally does not vote, but dislike her strongly enough to the point where they will make the effort to vote against her.
Did I say two? I meant three...Of course, the fraudulent/illegal/felon voting turnout will be massive, as will the first time twits who do not remember her previous Presidency, and think they are voting for student class president, not the leader of the free world. (Hillary promised better pizza in the school cafeteria and longer recess? Cool!)
Hillary is recognized as a ruthless person to those who she perceives as her enemies.
If she gets in power be prepared for some deep political persecutions to occur. This will not be pretty.
But she has name recognition and people already associate her with the White House.
“Hard to win when 50% of the voters will NEVER vote for you!”
Not hard at all. Hillary’s husband did it in 1992 with 43% of the popular vote, and again in 1996 with 49.2% of the vote.
In both cases, more than half the electorate voted for someone other than a Clinton.
All Hillary has to hope for is another funny-talking crazy Texan running as an independent to split the anti-Clinton vote again.
I like the way you throw in Romney there with Rudy. The case could be made that Fred is "quasi conservative" too. Refusal to state an opinion and say one is a Federalist could be interpretted as someone who isn't as conservative as they would like others to think, and this is their way of avoiding being called names. I guess two can play that game, so you are saying it's your way or the highway? That's nice, maybe we should all play that game. And what is it with this RINO insult? We are all individuals, people do think for themselves. That's really good, call names and isolate everyone. What makes you think you are the "real Republican?" It's just ridicules, do you have any idea of how dangerous the democratic party is? People can vary a little in their opinions, it does't make them fake. Meanwhile, while you play word games because people are individuals, you will help the traitor party to win. That's really healthy, there is nothing dysfunctional about that at all. Grow up.
That’s 50% of the LIVE vote. She’ll get 100% of the DEAD voters support.