Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zogby Poll: Half Say They Would Never Vote for Hillary Clinton for President
Zogby ^ | October 20, 2007

Posted on 10/20/2007 11:22:06 AM PDT by keepitreal

While she is winning wide support in nationwide samples among Democrats in the race for their party’s presidential nomination, half of likely voters nationwide said they would never vote for New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, a new Zogby Interactive poll shows.

The online survey of 9,718 likely voters nationwide showed that 50% said Clinton would never get their presidential vote. This is up from 46% who said they could never vote for Clinton in a Zogby International telephone survey conducted in early March. Older voters are most resistant to Clinton – 59% of those age 65 and older said they would never vote for the New York senator, but she is much more acceptable to younger voters: 42% of those age 18–29 said they would never vote for Clinton for President.

(Excerpt) Read more at zogby.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008polls; clinton; election; electionpresident; elections; hillary; negatives
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: SamAdams76

perfectly electable with the proper application of revolutionary politics through staging off noose intimidation and other race and class baiting schemes. The party being led by Hillary Clinton and Rahm Emmanuel know all about revolutionary politics.


41 posted on 10/20/2007 12:21:37 PM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpAndVote

In this instance it would be the wrong states.

I am really tired of having the socialistic fascists in power in this country. They have monopolized the educational systems and almost entirely eliminated any libertarian or conservative thought as racist or intolerant.

They have successfully taken over the schools and are indoctrinating the youth. We are doomed if we do not take it back.


42 posted on 10/20/2007 12:23:19 PM PDT by 2ndClassCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal
Two things:

1) We know that conservative leaning people are usually under-represented in polls (not sure if that's as true for the "interactives" as for telephone), so the actual percentage could be much higher.

2)I believe there's a fair amount of the public who normally does not vote, but dislike her strongly enough to the point where they will make the effort to vote against her.

Did I say two? I meant three...Of course, the fraudulent/illegal/felon voting turnout will be massive, as will the first time twits who do not remember her previous Presidency, and think they are voting for student class president, not the leader of the free world. (Hillary promised better pizza in the school cafeteria and longer recess? Cool!)

43 posted on 10/20/2007 12:26:38 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (Mrs Clinton! How'd your campain fund get so big????? "Ancient Chinese Secret!!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Hillary is recognized as a ruthless person to those who she perceives as her enemies.

If she gets in power be prepared for some deep political persecutions to occur. This will not be pretty.


44 posted on 10/20/2007 12:27:15 PM PDT by 2ndClassCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero
A valid point but she does not have near the charm that Bubba did.

But she has name recognition and people already associate her with the White House.

45 posted on 10/20/2007 12:27:58 PM PDT by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

“Hard to win when 50% of the voters will NEVER vote for you!”

Not hard at all. Hillary’s husband did it in 1992 with 43% of the popular vote, and again in 1996 with 49.2% of the vote.

In both cases, more than half the electorate voted for someone other than a Clinton.

All Hillary has to hope for is another funny-talking crazy Texan running as an independent to split the anti-Clinton vote again.


46 posted on 10/20/2007 12:29:03 PM PDT by bw17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hiredhand
"If a Guiliani, or Romney make it as a national nominee, the election is over."

I like the way you throw in Romney there with Rudy. The case could be made that Fred is "quasi conservative" too. Refusal to state an opinion and say one is a Federalist could be interpretted as someone who isn't as conservative as they would like others to think, and this is their way of avoiding being called names. I guess two can play that game, so you are saying it's your way or the highway? That's nice, maybe we should all play that game. And what is it with this RINO insult? We are all individuals, people do think for themselves. That's really good, call names and isolate everyone. What makes you think you are the "real Republican?" It's just ridicules, do you have any idea of how dangerous the democratic party is? People can vary a little in their opinions, it does't make them fake. Meanwhile, while you play word games because people are individuals, you will help the traitor party to win. That's really healthy, there is nothing dysfunctional about that at all. Grow up.

47 posted on 10/20/2007 12:29:36 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

That’s 50% of the LIVE vote. She’ll get 100% of the DEAD voters support.


48 posted on 10/20/2007 12:31:18 PM PDT by Terpin (Missing: One very clever and insightful tagline. Reward for safe return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal
Huck Fillary!
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
49 posted on 10/20/2007 12:31:28 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

50 posted on 10/20/2007 12:33:41 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

Don’t understand the charm bit with ‘Bubba’ maybe it is because I’m a male. All I saw from day one was a phoney, lying con artist.


51 posted on 10/20/2007 12:42:08 PM PDT by Eighth Square
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

But,of the other half she gets almost 50% averaging about 47%. very interesting.


52 posted on 10/20/2007 12:48:13 PM PDT by bilhosty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

How many dead people did they interview?

The cheating at the polls has grown every election cycle, and I hate to think what it will be like in 2008.

I understand that Dead, insane, felonious, and illegal alien voters favor hillary by 99%.


53 posted on 10/20/2007 12:49:46 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
"you're gonna need a bigger party"


54 posted on 10/20/2007 12:49:58 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SusaninOhio

“Gonna lose the fat vote”. That’s a good one! Hey, looking around where I live, that’s gonna be a whole bunch of voters!


55 posted on 10/20/2007 12:52:41 PM PDT by Eighth Square
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

I don’t know, half didn’t vote for Clinton I.


56 posted on 10/20/2007 12:54:02 PM PDT by I_like_good_things_too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal
Hard to win when 50% of the voters will NEVER vote for you!

Unless the GOP is stupid and selects someone like Rudy and a third party candidate who is a real conservative runs.

57 posted on 10/20/2007 12:54:40 PM PDT by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Wins
Wait til the Clintons lure bribe a third-party candidate like Ross Perot into the race...

Fixed.

58 posted on 10/20/2007 12:56:55 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Scrape the bottom, vote for Rodham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mainerforglobalwarming
Unfortunately no consensus conservative candidate yet.

Social issue stances versus likelihood of beating Hillary...

59 posted on 10/20/2007 12:59:15 PM PDT by tips up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

exactly what I was thinking.


60 posted on 10/20/2007 1:02:48 PM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson