Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NOTHING IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN LIFE
Free Republic post ^ | 10/20/2007 | by ex-snook

Posted on 10/20/2007 2:08:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

"I speak for at least half the people here, including the Founder Jim Robinson, who has stated he will not vote for Giuliani under any circumstance."

Agree.

NOTHING IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN LIFE

Don't Cut and Run, vote pro-life every time. It's the way you always win.

‘We cannot diminish the value of one category of human life — the unborn — without diminishing the value of all human life.’ —Ronald Reagan


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; elections; electionsgiuliani; giuliani; moralabsolutes; prolife; rudy; wordup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,461-1,465 next last
To: DevSix
Then what's the difference between Rudy and one of your Pol's who says he'll make Pro-life part of his litmus test?

Because the politicians I vote for have proven pro-life records, Rooty Toots openly supports abortion (and my suspicion is that a majority of the Rooty Rooters support abortion as well).

321 posted on 10/20/2007 5:01:50 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
No. I am saying that the WH is job title that requires more then the mind frame of one-issue thinking. The job of the WH is much larger than the issue of abortion.

Furthermore, those who believe litmus tests should be on our judges regarding abortion are wrong... The only litmus test should be will you uphold the laws of this nation / constitution....WITHOUT interjecting your own opinion or politics.

322 posted on 10/20/2007 5:02:12 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: mike h
That is an unintelligible statement. IOW, off the wall.

Either you support the sanctity of life, or you don't.

I'm not about to vote for a liberal to appease you and others like you.

323 posted on 10/20/2007 5:03:01 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: mike h

You have met the enemy. The she beast wears pants and the other a dress. Otherwise they are equally evil.


324 posted on 10/20/2007 5:03:10 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; stephenjohnbanker

Surgery can work wonders.................LOL.


325 posted on 10/20/2007 5:04:15 PM PDT by Liz (Rooty's not getting my guns or the name of my hairdresser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: mike h; Reagan Man

Conservatives don’t vote for abortionists!


326 posted on 10/20/2007 5:04:42 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
What a selfish rat you are.

John Q Adams told me to stand up on principle!

A dem Congress (and we will be losing seats this election) and a Hillary president? There might not be a country to save after 8 years.

We survived 8 years of Slick, didn't we? This without the blogs, Internet, FR, etc.

And you willing to take that chance makes me say again that you and people like you are NOT PATRIOTS.

I ain't voting for no Fruity if he's the nominee, forget it! Those who say that I'm helping to elect Hillary can kiss my behind.

If I may take a phrase from the day: you're PHONY PATRIOTS...you can't be a patriot and believe the whole country rests on one issue.

You're the phony patriot, not me. I ain't scared of Hillary like you guys are, hiding under your blankets with the light on and crap.

327 posted on 10/20/2007 5:05:20 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("Just 3 hours a day with Rudy Guiliani is all I ask" -- Sean Hannity is on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
No. I am saying that the WH is job title that requires more then the mind frame of one-issue thinking. The job of the WH is much larger than the issue of abortion.

If he had some special qualifications to be president, I might overlook my suspicion that he's another Larry Craig and that Hillary's thugs are going to expose him after he gets the nomination.

But I don't see any special qualifications. What are you seeing there that's so damned special?

328 posted on 10/20/2007 5:05:24 PM PDT by tear gas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
There is a difference between supporting abortion...and saying it doesn't belong in the federal govt's hands.

I doubt very much Rudy supports "abortions" (the act itself). Though he may support the notion that it is not the federal govt's role (or courts) to regulate it. Perhaps giving it back to the States to decide individually.

The WH is a job title that requires a larger mind frame then simply tying oneself to a one-issue voting base. Especially understanding that the pro-life side is winning. Facts, education and technology are all pushing the tide for the pro-life'ers.

Rudy agrees with conservative judges on the whole. That he may differ on the issue of abortion is immaterial on the whole.

329 posted on 10/20/2007 5:07:02 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

OK fine, I promise not to vote for eater beast, Happy? Is that a win?


330 posted on 10/20/2007 5:07:24 PM PDT by mike h (God bless Ronald Reagan,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: tear gas
If he had some special qualifications to be president

Mayor of New York City easily qualifies one for president. It is a job that is harder than most governorships and even running most countries. There is a reason it is referred to as the second hardest job in America. This says nothing about the positions of someone that has been NYC mayor, but they are nonetheless very qualified.

331 posted on 10/20/2007 5:08:12 PM PDT by scarface367 (The problem is we have yet to find a cure for stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: Hildy; Extremely Extreme Extremist
you can't be a patriot and believe the whole country rests on one issue.

No, it rests on "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness." Without LIFE the other two will eventually disappear, which I suppose is the ultimate goal of you and your liberal ilk.

332 posted on 10/20/2007 5:08:48 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
>>>>>Your suggested progress is all window dressing provided by the politicians to pander for your votes.

You're pathetic!

Anytime, anyone stands up for the sanctity of life, they'll get my vote. Reagan was pro-life. He got my vote. Fred is pro-life. He wants an end to Roe v Wade and abortion on demand abolished as the national policy of the US government. That is something I can wholeheartedly support.

333 posted on 10/20/2007 5:09:03 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: tear gas
But I don't see any special qualifications. What are you seeing there that's so damned special?

Sound position - I'd suggest Rudy has actually run something. He has actual had to be a leader, an actual decision maker! - Compared to the DEM alternatives, right there, that makes him special.

I've never said Rudy's "my man/candidate" - But I understand the seriousness of what is facing our next POTUS/CinC....and we cannot allow the ilk of the Democrat party in that position.

I clearly understand Rudy would be without question the correct choice (on the whole) for this nation over the Democrat candidate. Full stop.

334 posted on 10/20/2007 5:10:35 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I agree fully. Lesser then two evils... I wont sit by and let another KLINTON be president. NEVER NEVER NEVER!


335 posted on 10/20/2007 5:11:03 PM PDT by crazydad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I’m with you, if you mean Rudy > Hillary/ Obama/ Edwards, yes.

No way I’m voting for Rudy in the primary.


336 posted on 10/20/2007 5:12:00 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
I doubt very much Rudy supports "abortions" (the act itself).

He is on record as saying he would pay for his daughter to get one, as president he would try to get the American taxpayers for them.

The WH is a job title that requires a larger mind frame then simply tying oneself to a one-issue voting base.

Agreed, Rooty Tooty showing up at Ground Zero on 9/11 is "one issue" so he should just drop out now.

337 posted on 10/20/2007 5:13:15 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
The changes will have to be gradual with broad support including across the aisle.

Calling people names has not worked. “Carrying the fight” has not worked.

Just look at the results after 34 years. Paltry to no real change has been the rule. Even by those “pro-life” politicians who seem to get religion just before every election.

As a beginning, go across the aisle and try to make the law of the land require fetal sonograms required and available to all planning to abort their child. Then add one day of waiting before permitting the procedure. Primates visually seek out others and are reinforced and identify with others. This is why this will work. Appeal to the better angels of human nature rather than worst also underlies this principle.

People, and especially potential mothers, basically believe they are removing jello from their womb. This is a good first step and one that would likely work. it is also consistent with "Casey" SCOTUS decision.

It cannot work, if you demonize anyone who differs with your opinion; they may be your allies in gradually reducing the number of abortions. Immediately criminalizing 1,000,000 women a year (approx no abortions) is not going to happen in Congress or SCOTUS. Other than discharging emotion, trying to achieve this criminalization has no real workable goal.

338 posted on 10/20/2007 5:13:27 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: postaldave
once again, stay ON TOPIC

Sorry, I don't take orders from folks who don't know when to capitalize or use punctuation.

339 posted on 10/20/2007 5:14:18 PM PDT by humblegunner ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Liz

:-)


340 posted on 10/20/2007 5:14:54 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,461-1,465 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson