Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Redstate.com bans new Ron Paul supporters
Politico ^ | October 23, 2007 | Ryan Grim

Posted on 10/23/2007 9:41:03 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last
To: Baladas
Neither Republicans nor Democrats are making a move to send education back to the states. The last to hint at doing that was Ronald Reagan (remember...that was Anita Hill's excuse for why she followed Clarence Thomas to the EEOC from the ED).

If you can't understand the term "context," then I suppose you won't ever understand how comments made in 1988 relate. I think that if you take Dr. Paul's comments as a whole, it's clear he does see differences between Republicans and Democrats. However, the differences aren't great enough.

101 posted on 10/24/2007 5:19:11 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
My point was not to use the actual message on the straws because thats a lot of bunk. To be honest with you when I found the cartoon I couldn't make out myself what it even stated at the bottom of the straws. My point was to show the Ron Paul crowd that they cant win with the glass half empty.

Pardon me for not seeing the left wing message underneath the water where it should of been in the half empty glass. Good catch and my Mistake.

102 posted on 10/24/2007 6:22:42 PM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Kitanis

“Free Republic use to be a board of discussion..”

It still is, but Ron Paul wants to appease the Islamofascists by backing off and allowing them to take control of the Middle East. He has a growing Islamist support base. His supporters make the case that Arabs own the oil and should thus be able to control the oil. If control pertained only to race and a democratized area, it wouldn’t be such a problem. But he does not seem to understand that we cannot allow religious lunatics to control those resources.


103 posted on 10/24/2007 10:29:51 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“I was a big Buchanan supporter. I agree with your take on him. While the guy can be brilliant, his foreign policy views leave the reservation IMO, and don’t return home often enough.”

So was I along time ago. I still agree with him on many things, but you are very right about his foreign policy. I think the most isolationistic of our Founding Fathers would change their tune if they were alive and confronting today’s threat.


104 posted on 10/24/2007 10:37:13 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

along = a long


105 posted on 10/24/2007 10:37:42 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

So far as I can tell, Ron Paul has no plan to run 3rd party. He is bound and determined to get Hillary elected.


106 posted on 10/24/2007 10:41:24 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

Thanks. I agree with your take on our founding fathers. I think they would also.


107 posted on 10/24/2007 11:50:18 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (CRINTON has PAY FEAVER. There she goes now. Ah hsu, ah hsu, ahhhaa hsu, ah hsu, ahhhhhh hsu...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: sageb1; DoughtyOne
I was a big Buchanan supporter.

I remember when Pat was 'Braveheart', and we all communicated on listservs.

108 posted on 10/25/2007 12:31:11 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (No Covenant with Death: Giuliani Shall Not Pass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
His supporters make the case that Arabs own the oil and should thus be able to control the oil.

Well, it is their oil. Believe it or not, we have our own, but getting the Federal GOvernment to permit drilling on half of the land west of the Mississippi (Which is Federally owned) has been a real chore. In addition, drilling on our Continental Shelves, with the exception of parts of the Gulf of Mexico has been blocked. Heck, we're importing oil from Canada and causing American producers to take a $30/bbl hit on prices because the pipelines are full of foreign oil.

Islam only has as much control as our government gives them.

If control pertained only to race and a democratized area, it wouldn’t be such a problem. But he does not seem to understand that we cannot allow religious lunatics to control those resources.

As I said, the resources are theirs. We do have alternatives, we do not have to shell out billions to militarily secure the Islamic states, we have the option of drilling for our own, and all that would take is opening up some areas to exploration and letting the free market run its course right here at home.

In fact, with growing worldwide demand for the resources, the price is likely to decrease some and then remain reasonably stable even if we did not buy Islamic oil, which would keep the domestic oil industry strong enough to provide much more of what we need.

ANWR is just the tip of that iceberg.

109 posted on 10/25/2007 12:38:49 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

I’m not sure that I do. I’ve forgotten some of the places where I used to participate.


110 posted on 10/25/2007 1:15:03 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (CRINTON have PAY FEAVER. There she go now. Ah hsu, ah hsu, ahhhaa hsu, ah hsu. Vewy good liya...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Take it up with the environmentalists. It does not mean that we can allow Islamists to control resources.


111 posted on 10/25/2007 1:43:08 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

“Islam only has as much control as our government gives them.”

How about we evoke the ghost of Thomas Jefferson and ask him to take back the Treaty of Tripoli, our first appeasement treaty with Muslims? (And while he’s at it, he could also take back the part Adams inserted about America not being a Christian nation.)

Islam was created to oppose and replace Judaism and Christianity 1400 years ago. It gained control over many minds during the centuries prior to the birth of America, and historically, is only peaceful when in power. It is an ideology that lends itself to violence no matter where it exists.


112 posted on 10/25/2007 8:35:38 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Nothing wrong with banning nutjob Ron Paul supporters. Websites are not a democracy.


113 posted on 10/25/2007 8:45:10 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
Take it up with the environmentalists.

It is being/has been/and will continue to be done.

There is a definite parallel.

Nothing the energy industries (oil/coal/nuclear) do is enough to get the enviros to relent.

Jump through the hoops and they move the bar.

In essence, there is only peace when they are in control, when the energy industry pays its dhimmi tax to the enviros.

Maybe we should just slaughter the enviros and convert them from dirt worship to Christianity, (/sarcastic reference to Ann Coulter's comment about islam, and ecowhackos everywhere).

It does not mean that we can allow Islamists to control resources.

The resources belong to the Islamists, whether we like that or not. It is their stuff. One of the first lessons I learned is you do not take someone else's stuff, whether it be their jelly beans, their toys in the sandbox, their homes for a condo complex (something the SCOTUS should revisit), and a fundamental rule ( as in: "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's goods." and the old bellweather: "Thou shalt not steal.")

Now it may get your panties in a twist thinking of the Islamists having all that stuff, but it is their stuff.

My point is simply that we have our own stuff, don't need their damn stuff, and could be playing with our own, saving the tremendous cost (estimated at nearly $100/bbl when oil was a mere $20.00, not including the lives of our military personnel long before the current war) of securing the region so we can buy theirs.

The alternative is to kill them all and take theirs, while our domestic eco-jihadis run roughshod over the rest of us.

Now, I think we need to fight Islamists, simply because they have a long history of killing our people and breaking things which belong to us. That, however, does not change the fact that the resources of their countries are theirs, not ours. As long as those countries' resources are theirs, control of those resources is theirs, too, whether we like it or not.

114 posted on 10/25/2007 9:30:49 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

“Now, I think we need to fight Islamists, simply because they have a long history of killing our people and breaking things which belong to us”

Then we agree.


115 posted on 10/25/2007 10:22:11 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson