Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abolish the Air Force
The American Prospect ^ | Nov. 1, 2007 | Robert Farley

Posted on 11/02/2007 1:36:49 PM PDT by DesScorp

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 361-376 next last
To: ThisLittleLightofMine

It’s more like the “corporate branch”. :)


201 posted on 11/02/2007 5:31:41 PM PDT by Doohickey (Giuliani: Brokeback Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

Very true!


202 posted on 11/02/2007 5:33:04 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

Abolish the Air Force

I'd rather abolish the IRS, the welfare state, and the St. Dept....

...for starters.

203 posted on 11/02/2007 5:34:37 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo (“Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors and miss.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

Do we have an Air Force?


204 posted on 11/02/2007 5:37:01 PM PDT by bmwcyle (BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision

Exactly.


205 posted on 11/02/2007 5:38:33 PM PDT by festus (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

Good Lord! but there is a lot of stupidity on this thread.

The reason we need an independent Air Force is that the Army is clueless about airpower.

The best employment of CAS is to prevent the Army from ever encountering the enemy. You do this by bombing the enemy BEFORE they become ‘close’. Remember when our troops in Iraq were stuck in a ‘quagmire’? The press said that because our troops were not advancing - but during that ‘lull’, the USAF was pounding the enemy. When our troops started moving forward, their path was clear of main Army units.

Where did I learn this lesson? 3 rotations at NTC.

Ground pounders are not qualified to think on how to employ fast moving aircraft. That’s OK - I wouldn’t want a bunch of Air Force folks in command of a tank unit.

The main job of the USAF has NEVER been to strafe the enemy, nor should it be. CAS is not the main job of the USAF, nor should it be - that is a TERRIBLE way to employ airpower. Marines can get away with it only because the USAF is doing the job for them past the FEBA.

As for Iraq and Afghanistan - in case y’all missed it, the overall commander is an ARMY general. I remember making a Brigade CC pissed when I told him he wouldn’t get air support because he wasn’t the priority.

“Who in the hell are you to tell me that?”

“Sir, that is per the written orders of the DIVISION/CC.”

“Well”, said the Brigade CC, “I’ll be talking with the Division CC tomorrow!”

Two days later, he told the staff to take into account the fact that we were not the priority of effort and that Division assets might not be available...


206 posted on 11/02/2007 5:39:48 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I'm agnostic on evolution, but sit ups are from Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

If you think Army comm jamming is equivalent to USAF comm jamming, you are too ignorant to have any business posting.


207 posted on 11/02/2007 5:42:48 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I'm agnostic on evolution, but sit ups are from Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: magslinger
Yeah, that's a non-rate's job in Navair.

You can't equate the job or skills of a Navy Plane Captain and a USAF Crew Chief.

208 posted on 11/02/2007 5:43:14 PM PDT by TankerKC (You don't have to believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
You can't equate the job or skills of a Navy Plane Captain and a USAF Crew Chief.

True, but the guy that lovingly belts the pilot in and pats him on the head before he goes to rain death on the enemy is an E-2 or E-3 in the Navy. Or used to be. Things may have changed since my day.

209 posted on 11/02/2007 5:56:48 PM PDT by magslinger (cranky right-winger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp
Click pic for big zoom of this 10 ton beauty

fact sheet
210 posted on 11/02/2007 5:59:44 PM PDT by Gene Eric (~ Congress shall have the power to Tax for Defence ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

Only after both NEA’s have been abolished!


211 posted on 11/02/2007 6:02:48 PM PDT by G Larry (HILLARY CARE = DYING IN LINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Excellent!

Thanks for the ping! (I got hungry for some pizza, so I came back....)


212 posted on 11/02/2007 6:08:15 PM PDT by Monkey Face (It might look like I'm doing nothing, but at the cellular level, I'm really quite busy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

Umm...I don’t want to know about ‘the guy who lovingly belts the pilot in’.

Maybe it was because I was an EWO/WSO, but I always strapped myself in!

Although there was a gal in life support in Prowlers, who could adjust my G-suit anytime she wanted...


213 posted on 11/02/2007 6:09:17 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I'm agnostic on evolution, but sit ups are from Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

Well, speaking as an Air Force veteran, Vietnam days, I can say without reservation that you’re a clueless dolt. Have you any idea what scares the shit out of anyone who wishes us ill is? It’s not a grunt toting a rifle (though such a grunt is an awesome instrument of war), it’s having hell rained down on them from above. Go ask an NVA survivor about an arc light experience.


214 posted on 11/02/2007 6:17:27 PM PDT by ought-six ("Give me liberty, or give me death!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

In my A-7 squadron we used to climb up the side and help the pilot get the shoulder straps clicked. The last person to talk to them face to face before the flight.


215 posted on 11/02/2007 6:20:33 PM PDT by magslinger (cranky right-winger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

And they court-martialled Billy Mitchell because he pissed-off the conventional brass by sinking a warship from the air (something the Navy said could not be done) and then pretty much calling that same brass moronic and short-sighted.

Tell you what: Have the infantry move to take out an inland target without having first had air interdiction, and then ask the survivors of that infantry, if there are any, if they would have liked to have had their objective softened up by “tough love from above” before they ever went in.

There is nothing more satisfying and comforting than looking up and seeing the sky above you filled with a real “reach out and touch some one” force that is on your side.


216 posted on 11/02/2007 6:36:02 PM PDT by ought-six ("Give me liberty, or give me death!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Must be a Navy thing...

All MY pilots and aircrew members got a major kick when I had to “lovingly” see them off, although it would never have occurred to me to pat them on their helmets...

They knew that I knew what their actual expected mission attrition rates were.
They also knew I had a fear of heights.

Nothing beats pouring a playfull fighter pilot into an F-15, while both of us are in full chemical gear, and watching his face change when I tell him what his new mission is ...LOL!

217 posted on 11/02/2007 6:46:44 PM PDT by sarasmom (Some men are best put on a pedestal, and run away from just as fast as you can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

“In fact, the AF is morphing into Space Command. This is the same boneheaded thinking that prevailed when they talked about missiles eliminating the need for guns on fighters.”

I heartily agree with the second part, but as to the first...why should USAF get to monopolize space? As a writer in Proceedings Magazine put it, Space is a giant ocean, and oceans are where Navies go. If we ever truly militarize space beyond our orbit, the Naval model is certainly the logical one; the economics and realities of space travel favor the large traveling, self supporting ship model more than a model on the small craft squadron that would require a base somewhere.


218 posted on 11/02/2007 6:57:41 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom

Naw...I’m USAF, although I did some time in a Navy squadron. It actually has to do with how hard it is to get to the harness buckles. In aircraft where it is pretty easy, the pilot (or WSO) does it himself. In others, the crew chief assists.

Personally, I always pulled the buckles first (to make sure no one had cut them then re-inserted them...something that bought a bitter crew chief in F-4s some jail time), and left enough slack that I could get to them.


219 posted on 11/02/2007 7:00:50 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I'm agnostic on evolution, but sit ups are from Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Back to the past? The Air Force was separated from the Army because Army commanders always wanted first priority use of airpower in their own geographical area.

Any strategic use of airpower, such as bombing Iraq and Afghanistan from bases in the CONUS, requires that it be a separate service with its own chain of command. The same is true of long-range airlift and air refueling and air rescue.

And it is essential to establish air superiority before the use of any ground forces other than special ops, or they will be chewed to pieces by enemy airpower. That takes fighters, with massive coordination through their own chain of command, as we saw before the invasion of Iraq.


220 posted on 11/02/2007 7:03:18 PM PDT by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 361-376 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson