Skip to comments.
PBS Telling Teachers to Violate First Amendment, Group Says
CNSN News ^
| November 13, 2007
| Randy Hall
Posted on 11/13/2007 1:40:53 PM PST by yoe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-271 next last
1
posted on
11/13/2007 1:40:57 PM PST
by
yoe
To: yoe
Well there’s a big surprise.
2
posted on
11/13/2007 1:42:23 PM PST
by
ECM
(Government is a make-work program for lawyers.)
To: yoe
To: yoe
PBS should have it public funding pulled and should be independent. It acts on its own so it should manage that way.
4
posted on
11/13/2007 1:43:40 PM PST
by
kevinm13
(The Main Stream Media is dead! Fox News Channel and Freerepublic Rocks!)
To: ECM
Can they show Inherit the Wind? That’s a movie about a trial as well.
5
posted on
11/13/2007 1:43:56 PM PST
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: yoe
What a load of horse pucky!
6
posted on
11/13/2007 1:44:19 PM PST
by
vpintheak
(Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
To: yoe
"The irony is that discussing intelligent design would not teach any student about any religious belief... Liar, liar, pants on fire. Sorry, bub, but the "wedge document" has already leaked and exposed that bit of chicanery.
...the PBS materials, on the other hand, will," he said."
Oh, and bearing false witness against thy neighbor is on God's Top Ten No-Nos List. Randal Wenger had best arrange to have himself buried in one of those asbestos fireman suits....
7
posted on
11/13/2007 1:45:30 PM PST
by
steve-b
(Sin lies only in hurting others unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. --RAH)
To: yoe
Albert Einstein believed in a Creator and he is certainly a lot smarter than any of the Christian haters in the ACLU.
8
posted on
11/13/2007 1:46:43 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: yoe
“the briefing packet only promotes religious viewpoints that are friendly towards evolution”
How about promoting the Scientific evidence that is ‘friendly’ towards evolution? Scientific evidence is not a religious viewpoint.
9
posted on
11/13/2007 1:46:57 PM PST
by
allmendream
(A binary modality is a sure sign you don't understand the problem. (Hunter 08))
To: kevinm13
PBS should have it public funding pulled and should be independent. It acts on its own so it should manage that way.And, NO ONE who has a brain cares what Rupaul or his Paulie-bots think. PBS is nothing but and arm of the liberal dimocrat party!
10
posted on
11/13/2007 1:47:39 PM PST
by
A. Morgan
(Rupaul is a doofus! Thank me!)
To: steve-b
Do ya really think he’s headed for Hell over this?
11
posted on
11/13/2007 1:48:12 PM PST
by
SJSAMPLE
To: yoe
To: yoe
Oh, looky... another thread about evolution and religion.
Maybe this’ll be the one that finally settles it.
[snort]
[chuckle]
Bwa... bw... bwaaahahahaha....! :-)
13
posted on
11/13/2007 1:49:40 PM PST
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: kevinm13
Are you kidding? They would have to Whine 24/7 to make enough money to buy Garrison Keeler lunch!
14
posted on
11/13/2007 1:50:26 PM PST
by
Shady
(The Fairness Doctrine is ANYTHING but fair!!!!)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Albert Einstein also believed that Natural Selection was the theory that best explained Biological evolution, and he was certainly a lot smarter than any of the Science haters at the Dyscovery Institute.
15
posted on
11/13/2007 1:50:33 PM PST
by
allmendream
(A binary modality is a sure sign you don't understand the problem. (Hunter 08))
To: yoe
No end to this. Evolution is not a science—all it offers is a theory. Which proves what—nothing!
16
posted on
11/13/2007 1:50:52 PM PST
by
GOPologist
(Btry. B, 228 FA Bn.-155mm Howitzer. WW 2 (Europe))
To: yoe
Why do we tolerate Government Administered Schools? The whole issue could be solved by getting rid of G-Schools.
17
posted on
11/13/2007 1:52:03 PM PST
by
nsmart
To: ECM
This article wins the “Most Ironic Complaint in History” award.
18
posted on
11/13/2007 1:52:29 PM PST
by
Shryke
To: yoe
>>In the booklet, teachers are instructed to use such discussion questions as: “Can you accept evolution and still believe in religion?” The answer to that query is provided as: “Yes. The common view that evolution is inherently antireligious is simply false.”
“This statement is simplistic and not neutral among different religions, and in that sense arguably inconsistent with Supreme Court teachings concerning neutrality,” said attorney Casey Luskin, program officer for public policy and legal affairs at the institute.<<
This is absurd. These people are absurd.
The people making these attacks on science are the people who spend their lives trying to force schools to teach religion.
For them to come back and say that teachers are not allowed to even say they don’t oppose religion and that science doesn’t oppose religion is highly hypocritical.
19
posted on
11/13/2007 1:52:31 PM PST
by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
To: nsmart
20
posted on
11/13/2007 1:52:57 PM PST
by
ari-freedom
(I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-271 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson